It is not strange that a young man devoted to literature, and acquainted only with the literature of France, should have looked with profound veneration on the genius of Voltaire."A man who has never seen the sun," says Calderon, in one of his charming comedies, "cannot be blamed for thinking that no glory can exceed that of the moon.A man who has seen neither moon nor sun, cannot be blamed for talking of the unrivalled brightness of the morning star." Had Frederic been able to read Homer and Milton or even Virgil and Tasso, his admiration of the Henriade would prove that he was utterly destitute of the power of discerning what is excellent in art.Had he been familiar with Sophocles or Shakspeare, we should have expected him to appreciate Zaire more justly.Had he been able to study Thucydides and Tacitus in the original Greek and Latin, he would have known that there were heights in the eloquence of history far beyond the reach of the author of the Life of Charles the Twelfth.But the finest heroic poem, several of the most powerful tragedies, and the most brilliant and picturesque historical work that Frederic had ever read, were Voltaire's.Such high and various excellence moved the young Prince almost to adoration.The opinions of Voltaire on religious and philosophical questions had not yet been fully exhibited to the public.At a later period, when an exile from his country, and at open war with the Church, he spoke out.But when Frederic was at Rheinsberg, Voltaire was still a courtier;and, though he could not always curb his petulant wit, he had as yet published nothing that could exclude him from Versailles, and little that a divine of the mild and generous school of Grotius and Tillotson might not read with pleasure.In the Henriade, in Zaire, and in Alzire, Christian piety is exhibited in the most amiable form; and, some years after the period of which we are writing, a Pope condescended to accept the dedication of Mahomet.
The real sentiments of the poet, however, might be clearly perceived by a keen eye through the decent disguise with which he veiled them, and could not escape the sagacity of Frederic, who held similar opinions, and had been accustomed to practise similar dissimulation.
The Prince wrote to his idol in the style of a worshipper; and Voltaire replied with exquisite grace and address.Acorrespondence followed, which may be studied with advantage by those who wish to become proficients in the ignoble art of flattery.No man ever paid compliments better than Voltaire.His sweetest confectionery had always a delicate, yet stimulating flavour, which was delightful to palates wearied by the coarse preparations of inferior artists.It was only from his hand that so much sugar could be swallowed without making the swallower sick.Copies of verses, writing-desks, trinkets of amber, were exchanged between the friends.Frederic confided his writings to Voltaire; and Voltaire applauded, as if Frederic had been Racine and Bossuet in one.One of his Royal Highness's performances was a refutation of Machiavelli.Voltaire undertook to convey it to the press.It was entitled the Anti-Machiavel, and was an edifying homily against rapacity, perfidy, arbitrary government, unjust war, in short, against almost everything for which its author is now remembered among men.
The old King uttered now and then a ferocious growl at the diversions of Rheinsberg.But his health was broken; his end was approaching; and his vigour was impaired.He had only one pleasure left, that of seeing tall soldiers.He could always be propitiated by a present of a grenadier of six feet four or six feet five; and such presents were from time to time judiciously offered by his son.
Early in the year 1740, Frederic William met death with a firmness and dignity worthy of a better and wiser man; and Frederic, who had just completed his twenty-eighth year, became King of Prussia.His character was little understood.That he had good abilities, indeed, no person who had talked with him, or corresponded with him, could doubt.But the easy Epicurean life which he had led, his love of good cookery and good wine, of music, of conversation, of light literature, led many to regard him as a sensual and intellectual voluptuary.His habit of canting about moderation, peace, liberty, and the happiness which a good mind derives from the happiness of others, had imposed on some who should have known better.Those who thought best of him, expected a Telemachus after Fenelon's pattern.Others predicted the approach of a Medicean age, an age propitious to learning and art, and not unpropitious to pleasure.Nobody had the least suspicion that a tyrant of extraordinary military and political talents, of industry more extraordinary still, without fear, without faith, and without mercy, had ascended the throne.
