登陆注册
15451600000014

第14章 13

Perhaps enough has been said about the proof of necessity, how it comes about and how it differs from the proof of a simple statement.

We proceed to discuss that which is possible, when and how and by what means it can be proved. I use the terms 'to be possible' and 'the possible' of that which is not necessary but, being assumed, results in nothing impossible. We say indeed ambiguously of the necessary that it is possible. But that my definition of the possible is correct is clear from the phrases by which we deny or on the contrary affirm possibility. For the expressions 'it is not possible to belong', 'it is impossible to belong', and 'it is necessary not to belong' are either identical or follow from one another; consequently their opposites also, 'it is possible to belong', 'it is not impossible to belong', and 'it is not necessary not to belong', will either be identical or follow from one another. For of everything the affirmation or the denial holds good. That which is possible then will be not necessary and that which is not necessary will be possible.

It results that all premisses in the mode of possibility are convertible into one another. I mean not that the affirmative are convertible into the negative, but that those which are affirmative in form admit of conversion by opposition, e.g. 'it is possible to belong' may be converted into 'it is possible not to belong', and 'it is possible for A to belong to all B' into 'it is possible for A to belong to no B' or 'not to all B', and 'it is possible for A to belong to some B' into 'it is possible for A not to belong to some B'.

And similarly the other propositions in this mode can be converted.

For since that which is possible is not necessary, and that which is not necessary may possibly not belong, it is clear that if it is possible that A should belong to B, it is possible also that it should not belong to B: and if it is possible that it should belong to all, it is also possible that it should not belong to all. The same holds good in the case of particular affirmations: for the proof is identical. And such premisses are affirmative and not negative; for 'to be possible' is in the same rank as 'to be', as was said above.

Having made these distinctions we next point out that the expression 'to be possible' is used in two ways. In one it means to happen generally and fall short of necessity, e.g. man's turning grey or growing or decaying, or generally what naturally belongs to a thing (for this has not its necessity unbroken, since man's existence is not continuous for ever, although if a man does exist, it comes about either necessarily or generally). In another sense the expression means the indefinite, which can be both thus and not thus, e.g. an animal's walking or an earthquake's taking place while it is walking, or generally what happens by chance: for none of these inclines by nature in the one way more than in the opposite.

That which is possible in each of its two senses is convertible into its opposite, not however in the same way: but what is natural is convertible because it does not necessarily belong (for in this sense it is possible that a man should not grow grey) and what is indefinite is convertible because it inclines this way no more than that. Science and demonstrative syllogism are not concerned with things which are indefinite, because the middle term is uncertain; but they are concerned with things that are natural, and as a rule arguments and inquiries are made about things which are possible in this sense. Syllogisms indeed can be made about the former, but it is unusual at any rate to inquire about them.

These matters will be treated more definitely in the sequel; our business at present is to state the moods and nature of the syllogism made from possible premisses. The expression 'it is possible for this to belong to that' may be understood in two senses: 'that' may mean either that to which 'that' belongs or that to which it may belong; for the expression 'A is possible of the subject of B' means that it is possible either of that of which B is stated or of that of which B may possibly be stated. It makes no difference whether we say, A is possible of the subject of B, or all B admits of A. It is clear then that the expression 'A may possibly belong to all B' might be used in two senses. First then we must state the nature and characteristics of the syllogism which arises if B is possible of the subject of C, and A is possible of the subject of B. For thus both premisses are assumed in the mode of possibility; but whenever A is possible of that of which B is true, one premiss is a simple assertion, the other a problematic. Consequently we must start from premisses which are similar in form, as in the other cases.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 东游山河

    东游山河

    神界之下千丝界拥有无数的小世界组成每个小世界都拥有着自己的修炼规则
  • 兵魂守护

    兵魂守护

    在抗震救灾中,徒步深入地震中心的武警某师电子侦察分队上尉分队长王俊,在悬崖小路上遭遇余震,被从天而降的巨石击中,坠向山涧,祸不单行,一道闪电从天而降,在他魂飞魄散的瞬间劈中了他……相爱多年的恋人、奉献青春的部队,是他最深的挂念。看他能否以纯灵魂的形式存在、该如何醒来、与心爱的人能否再见、怎样实现自己一个男人守护爱情的诺言,如何以一个战士之魂守护精忠报国的誓言。
  • 老公大人请慢点

    老公大人请慢点

    他,是一匹狼。随时随地准备吃下猎物。她,是单纯的小红帽。一步一步的受着狼的诱惑。从他对她的折磨,刁难,嫌弃,到她对他的爱,转变中的苦涩,让人不能反抗。“想吃什么?”“老婆,我想吃你”
  • 至尊写手

    至尊写手

    黄鹏捡到一个优盘,里面可以自动生成原创的诗歌散文小说……然后,他成为了一名网络作家。日更十万字什么的简直不要太简单。字数超越《从零开始》不是梦想。网文界的速度与激情已经开始。这本书里不仅有那些年的青春和理想,更有湿和远方。QQ群:55832567
  • 武者时代.

    武者时代.

    步入修者的世界,玄妙的双重奏将林邵峰的信心打击的体无完肤,但他却未曾喊停过,背着伤痕累累的负担,一步步走上终点,去仰望曾经嘲笑过自己的人,七情六欲终究摆脱不了他的内心,只是一味的拼搏,保护自己身边的一切、简单的道理,无比坚韧的心!
  • 无往不胜

    无往不胜

    有幸走过三生路,跨越时间的长短,最终到达成神的彼岸。
  • 都市绝品风少

    都市绝品风少

    美女校花“保镖,为什么你的身手这么好啊”,保镖“因为我帅啊”美女老师”你医术为什么这么好啊".秦风“因为我帅啊”......
  • 北斗帝尊黑袍

    北斗帝尊黑袍

    那一年,苦命少年为求仙路舍身忘命徒手攀爬通天峰...又一年,无敌的天庭之主聚天庭气运于一身逆天飞仙,天劫至,天庭崩,天帝陨,徒留万古悲名...这一年,平凡少年川页偶获奇异玉牌,从此开启了他的飞仙之旅...
  • 九月的桃花

    九月的桃花

    路是脚踏出来的,历史是人写出来的,人的每个行为都书写自己的传说,尽请一阅
  • 少将王妃不好惹

    少将王妃不好惹

    在未知的世界,同一片天空下,不同的人生,一次重生!她凭自己的一身本事,过人的智力,将在这同样的天空不同样的人生上重新闯出一片天地!而他却孤傲冷漠,维她能让他感受到爱。新手上任,请多指教!!!