登陆注册
15701200000016

第16章

And whether the introducing of things so inconceivable be not a reproach to mathematics?

Qu. 23. Whether inconsistencies can be truths? Whether points repugnant and absurd are to be admitted upon any subjects, or in any science? And whether the use of infinites ought to be allowed as a sufficient pretext and apology for the admitting of such points in geometry?

Qu. 24. Whether a quantity be not properly said to be known, when we know its proportion to given quantities? And whether this proportion can be known but by expressions or exponents, either geometrical, algebraical, or arithmetical? And whether expressions in lines or species can be useful but so far forth as they are reducible to numbers?

Qu. 25. Whether the finding out proper expressions or notations of quantity be not the most general character and tendency of the mathematics? And arithmetical operation that which limits and defines their use?

Qu. 26. Whether mathematicians have sufficiently considered the analogy and use of signs? And how far the specific limited nature of things corresponds thereto?

Qu. 27. Whether because, in stating a general case of pure algebra, we are at full liberty to make a character denote either a positive or a negative quantity, or nothing at all, we may therefore, in a geometrical case, limited by hypotheses and reasonings from particular properties and relations of figures, claim the same licence?

Qu. 28. Whether the shifting of the hypothesis, or (as we may call it) the fallacia suppositionis be not a sophism that far and wide infects the modern reasonings, both in the mechanical philosophy and in the abstruse and fine geometry?

Qu. 29. Whether we can form an idea or notion of velocity distinct from and exclusive of its measures, as we can of heat distinct from and exclusive of the degrees on the thermometer by which it is measured? And whether this be not supposed in the reasonings of modern analysts?

Qu. 30. Whether motion can be conceived in a point of space? And if motion cannot, whether velocity can? And if not, whether a first or last velocity can be conceived in a mere limit, either initial or final, of the described space?

Qu. 31. Where there are no increments, whether there can be any ratio of increments? Whether nothings can be considered as proportional to real quantities? Or whether to talk of their proportions be not to talk nonsense? Also in what sense we are to understand the proportion of a surface to a line, of an area to an ordinate?

And whether species or numbers, though properly expressing quantities which are not homogeneous, may yet be said to express their proportion to each other?

Qu. 32. Whether if all assignable circles may be squared, the circle is not, to all intents and purposes, squared as well as the parabola? Of whether a parabolic area can in fact be measured more accurately than a circular?

Qu. 33. Whether it would not be righter to approximate fairly than to endeavour at accuracy by sophisms?

Qu. 34. Whether it would not be more decent to proceed by trials and inductions, than to pretend to demonstrate by false principles?

Qu. 35. Whether there be not a way of arriving at truth, although the principles are not scientific, nor the reasoning just? And whether such a way ought to be called a knack or a science?

Qu. 36. Whether there can be science of the conclusion where there is not evidence of the principles? And whether a man can have evidence of the principles without understanding them? And therefore, whether the mathematicians of the present age act like men of science, in taking so much more pains to apply their principles than to understand them?

Qu. 37. Whether the greatest genius wrestling with false principles may not be foiled? And whether accurate quadratures can be obtained without new postulata or assumptions? And if not, whether those which are intelligible and consistent ought not to be preferred to the contrary? See sect. 28 and 29.

Qu. 38. Whether tedious calculations in algebra and fluxions be the likeliest method to improve the mind? And whether men's being accustomed to reason altogether about mathematical signs and figures doth not make them at a loss how to reason without them?

Qu. 39. Whether, whatever readiness analysts acquire in stating a problem, or finding apt expressions for mathematical quantities, the same doth necessarily infer a proportionable ability in conceiving and expressing other matters?

Qu. 40. Whether it be not a general case or rule, that one and the same coefficient dividing equal products gives equal quotients? And yet whether such coefficient can be interpreted by o or nothing? Or whether any one will say that if the equation 2 o = 5 o be divided by o , the quotients on both sides are equal? Whether therefore a case may not be general with respect to all quantities and yet not extend to nothings, or include the case of nothing? And whether the bringing nothing under the notion of quantity may not have betrayed men into false reasoning?

Qu. 41. Whether in the most general reasonings about equalities and proportions men may not demonstrate as well as in geometry? Whether in such demonstrations they are not obliged to the same strict reasoning as in geometry? And whether such their reasonings are not deduced from the same axioms with those in geometry? Whether therefore algebra be not as truly a science as geometry?

同类推荐
  • Dorothy and the Wizard in Oz

    Dorothy and the Wizard in Oz

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 四月一日过江赴荆州

    四月一日过江赴荆州

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 维摩经玄疏

    维摩经玄疏

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 医方集解

    医方集解

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • Eothen

    Eothen

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 鬼卫

    鬼卫

    明朝初年,天下平定,民间厉鬼丛生,白莲妖人蠢蠢欲动,塞外元蒙余孽虎视眈眈,沿海地区,倭寇亦是不安分,明太祖成立鬼卫四院,内御河山,外攘敌寇……
  • lol全职高手异界行

    lol全职高手异界行

    凭借这来自符文大陆的馈赠执掌各系元素;而那无极,疾风终归剑道大途,我是化身传说的全职者,我的敌人终遭毁灭!而当那破碎虚空而来的敌人降临之时,全职者终带来救赎或是尽头?还是弄个群吧。。。612103759
  • 星战之巅

    星战之巅

    星空战场胜者为王,烈武扬空改变世界法则。星战赛场玩着瞩目,每个人都为之痴迷,为胜利者欢呼。可没有一个人能够看清他们的真面目,在叱咤星空的背后,又隐藏着怎样的艰辛。真正的王者站在巅峰,即使没有人理解,也会捍卫他的王座。银河3015年甲级巅峰联赛,即将揭晓,谁才是真正的王者。
  • 乱拂江山本王清梦

    乱拂江山本王清梦

    我不是上帝的宠儿,我只能凭靠自己的实力在逆境中求生并且活下去。雍亲王,我是你府里的尖细,却自曝身份,光明正大地在你身边晃荡。苏似锦,你是我的老板兼上司,我们成为大清好闺蜜。在最后关头,你们将承受我致命的一击吧。哇哈哈!
  • 恋上恶少:拽丫头化身乖乖女

    恋上恶少:拽丫头化身乖乖女

    夕阳被半红的云轻扶着,温柔的光慵懒的撒过窗台,落在书桌上,蝉鸣已经暂歇了,只有零星三两声传来,透过窗去,梧桐的叶子随着风轻轻打着拍子,有花香似有似无的穿过窗缝,漫进屋里,讲台上,语文老师仍在温声软语的讲解着“红透春残青杏小,燕子飞时,绿水人家绕”颜小染单手支着下巴,目光在黑板和窗外逡巡,似乎随时可能睡去的样子,就在这是,一阵尖叫声从操场上传来……
  • 有生之年:我只爱你

    有生之年:我只爱你

    我承认,我是个任性的孩子。我承认,我想用我的世界来换取一张通往你的世界的入场卷。不过,那只不过是我一厢情愿而已;我的世界,你不在乎,你的世界我被驱逐。
  • 搔首问

    搔首问

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 三界万物

    三界万物

    一介书生,偶得机缘,获上古传承,得无上之力,却深藏实力在,一步一步感悟大道,结良缘,踏宗门,断恩仇!
  • 校园之最强插班生

    校园之最强插班生

    匪气少年终于踏足青春校园,迎接他的,是一个绚丽缤纷的花花世界。一次次的扮猪吃虎,惊掉你们的下巴;一次次的以弱胜强,灭了你们的气焰;一次次的危难出手,俘获一众芳心;一次次的巅峰鏖战,点燃一腔热血。
  • 傲娇王爷:长公主别逃

    傲娇王爷:长公主别逃

    天下安宁,祁国乃属中原大国,塞外由燕国镇守。祁国晏酒节上太后逝世,祁皇带回了一个神秘女子,后宫暗涌纷争,各路妃子刁难,谁知她身份尊贵,竟是那多年前的曜歌长公主。他,祁国唯一的异姓王,沙场的战神,传闻中心狠手辣,对人冷漠至极。当腹黑长公主对上傲娇异姓王,他以她是他的“救命恩人”之称黏在她身边美名曰报恩,她却崩溃想要“私人空间”。本文男强女强,一对一身心感觉,没有大虐,欢迎阅读。