登陆注册
15401600000012

第12章 THE OLD TESTAMENT (3)

In the first place, there is no affirmative evidence that Moses is the author of those books; and that he is the author, is altogether an unfounded opinion, got abroad nobody knows how.The style and manner in which those books are written give no room to believe, or even to suppose, they were written by Moses; for it is altogether the style and manner of another person speaking of Moses.In Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers, (for every thing in Genesis is prior to the times of Moses and not the least allusion is made to him therein,) the whole, I say, of these books is in the third person; it is always, the Lord said unto Moses, or Moses said unto the Lord; or Moses said unto the people, or the people said unto Moses; and this is the style and manner that historians use in speaking of the person whose lives and actions they are writing.It may be said, that a man may speak of himself in the third person, and, therefore, it may be supposed that Moses did; but supposition proves nothing; and if the advocates for the belief that Moses wrote those books himself have nothing better to advance than supposition, they may as well be silent.

But granting the grammatical right, that Moses might speak of himself in the third person, because any man might speak of himself in that manner, it cannot be admitted as a fact in those books, that it is Moses who speaks, without rendering Moses truly ridiculous and absurd: -- for example, Numbers xii.3: "Now the man Moses was very MEEK, above all the men which were on the face of the earth." If Moses said this of himself, instead of being the meekest of men, he was one of the most vain and arrogant coxcombs;and the advocates for those books may now take which side they please, for both sides are against them: if Moses was not the author, the books are without authority; and if he was the author, the author is without credit, because to boast of meekness is the reverse of meekness, and is a lie in sentiment.

In Deuteronomy, the style and manner of writing marks more evidently than in the former books that Moses is not the writer.The manner here used is dramatical; the writer opens the subject by a short introductory discourse, and then introduces Moses as in the act of speaking, and when he has made Moses finish his harrangue, he (the writer) resumes his own part, and speaks till he brings Moses forward again, and at last closes the scene with an account of the death, funeral, and character of Moses.

This interchange of speakers occurs four times in this book: from the first verse of the first chapter, to the end of the fifth verse, it is the writer who speaks; he then introduces Moses as in the act of making his harrangue, and this continues to the end of the 40th verse of the fourth chapter; here the writer drops Moses, and speaks historically of what was done in consequence of what Moses, when living, is supposed to have said, and which the writer has dramatically rehearsed.

The writer opens the subject again in the first verse of the fifth chapter, though it is only by saying that Moses called the people of Isracl together;he then introduces Moses as before, and continues him as in the act of speaking, to the end of the 26th chapter.He does the same thing at the beginning of the 27th chapter; and continues Moses as in the act of speaking, to the end of the 28th chapter.At the 29th chapter the writer speaks again through the whole of the first verse, and the first line of the second verse, where he introduces Moses for the last time, and continues him as in the act of speaking, to the end of the 33d chapter.

The writer having now finished the rehearsal on the part of Moses, comes forward, and speaks through the whole of the last chapter: he begins by telling the reader, that Moses went up to the top of Pisgah, that he saw from thence the land which (the writer says) had been promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob; that he, Moses, died there in the land of Moab, that he buried him in a valley in the land of Moab, but that no man knoweth of his sepulchre unto this day, that is unto the time in which the writer lived who wrote the book of Deuteronomy.The writer then tells us, that Moses was one hundred and ten years of age when he died -- that his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated; and he concludes by saying, that there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses, whom, says this anonymous writer, the Lord knew face to face.

Having thus shewn, as far as grammatical evidence implics, that Moses was not the writer of those books, I will, after making a few observations on the inconsistencies of the writer of the book of Deuteronomy, proceed to shew, from the historical and chronological evidence contained in those books, that Moses was not, because he could not be, the writer of them;and consequently, that there is no authority for believing that the inhuman and horrid butcheries of men, women, and children, told of in those books, were done, as those books say they were, at the command of God.It is a duty incumbent on every true deist, that he vindicates the moral justice of God against the calumnies of the Bible.

The writer of the book of Deuteronomy, whoever he was, for it is an anonymous work, is obscure, and also contradictory with himself in the account he has given of Moses.

After telling that Moses went to the top of Pisgah (and it does not appear from any account that he ever came down again) he tells us, that Moses died there in the land of Moab, and that he buried him in a valley in the land of Moab; but as there is no antecedent to the pronoun he, there is no knowing who he was, that did bury him.If the writer meant that he (God) buried him, how should he (the writer) know it? or why should we (the readers) believe him? since we know not who the writer was that tells us so, for certainly Moses could not himself tell where he was buried.

The writer also tells us, that no man knoweth where the sepulchre of Moses is unto this day, meaning the time in which this writer lived; how then should he know that Moses was buried in a valley in the land of Moab?

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 水浒日记

    水浒日记

    作者以市井角度解构那些人们耳熟能详的梁山好汉。嬉笑怒骂中针砭时弊,荒诞风趣中有着现实的投影。语言诙谐,文笔独到,让文学形象与现实生活相接。受到广大网友的追捧。让《沙僧日记》和《悟空传》都显得笑点低的诙谐之作。这里有比沙僧更吐槽的李逵,这里有比唐僧更厚黑的宋江,史上最给力的搞笑日记,你不看,就out了。
  • 明星女王:美男乖乖绕膝来

    明星女王:美男乖乖绕膝来

    明星女王:美男乖乖绕膝来呆萌女主:报道,不小心踩到了一只脚。对不起。男主华丽一笑:宝贝,不用道歉,我本来就是你的了。女主完败。女主怒意:学长能不能离我远一点。男主勾唇:谁叫学长,给爷理我家宝贝远点。女主完败。女主虚脱到:帅哥别追我了,你让我干嘛都行。男主:真的?!那…你搬来我家住。女主仰天长啸:我真的只是踩了他的脚。史上最毒舌的美男模特VS史上最呆萌的新人明星。男主:美妞可惜了。女主:帅比也可惜了。【打滚球收藏】【打滚球推荐】【打滚球评论】【打滚打滚】【凉凉出品,防偷窃】
  • 仙尊九天

    仙尊九天

    前世决战,浴血全身,少年不甘,却无可奈何。今生有幸,少年转生。这是一个修仙的世界,这个世界,有花,有剑,有着与前世的不同,更是有着巅峰的追求。平生自问九千道,不破苍生誓不还!“诗灵”?怎么还会有诗灵?禁术透骨,少年九死一生,但,自从他做了那个”任性”的决定,他的道,便,已经不同……
  • 天才傲世妃

    天才傲世妃

    她是一个杀手,残忍,冷血又狡诈如狐,而她是将军府里的废物加花痴的嫡出小姐,当她穿越到她的身上会发生拿些有趣的事呢!本文美男多多,还有各种萌宠来袭,女主强大腹黑,男主多多个个身心干净。
  • 那女子为什么单身

    那女子为什么单身

    润月是个整个厂区有名的漂亮姑娘,很多人盯着。可人家姑娘不光学习好,父母视若掌上明珠。所以大家都不敢下手。直到有一天润月出门坐上了东去的列车...
  • 神纪元

    神纪元

    外星人降临地球,自封为神,引发‘进化之战’,战后的人类生活在由‘神’创造的神圣教会统制世界中,而人类活动的领域在‘神’的帮助下几乎遍及整个太阳系。‘神’为何而来?‘神’是何种存在?
  • 青眉

    青眉

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 恶魔不吃天堂草

    恶魔不吃天堂草

    “只是因为站在低处,就必须一直抬头仰视着他人活下去吗……”“只是因为站在高处,就必须一直低头俯视着他人活下去吗……”天地不仁,以万物为刍狗……“哥哥,我们什么时候才能从这里出去啊?”少年怀中的孩童用稚嫩的童声问道,眨巴着眼睛仰头看向那个被自己所尊敬的兄长,眸中泛着天真的光芒。“很快了,如果你困了就先睡觉吧。”少年有些宠溺的刮了刮孩童的鼻尖,抬头望向窗外的星空,星光映照在他的脸上,显得格外静谧。星空底下,却满是暗红的残肢断臂与哀嚎着的,行尸走肉……【正文是第二卷,请别理会第一卷】
  • 鬼女追夫

    鬼女追夫

    她本是一缕无处所依的孤魂野鬼,经历了数万年的光阴,前尘旧事早已忘却。再睁眼时却是一具少女之身,既是如此,面对“恶霸”的欺凌,当狠狠地欺凌回去;面对这个“到处乱咬人”的俊美少年,一个手刀便朝他的后颈砍去。偏偏自个儿还不能弃他不顾,需得劳心劳力地把他拖回家好好养着,当真是个麻烦!“少年,你好歹转过来看看我啊?”“……”“嘁,真是难伺候,明明是你先扑上来咬了我,还可恨地弄了个共生契约。”“……”“我说,你该不会是个哑巴吧?需要我给你拿纸笔么??”“……”“唉,你咋就这么可怜呢。放心,今后姐来养你!”“……不需要。请你把我身上的绳子解开。”
  • 冷酷王子的拽公主

    冷酷王子的拽公主

    她——慕容伊灵,慕容家大小姐,原本性格活泼的她因为母亲的死,她的变得冷漠,因为父亲出轨,母亲被那个小三害死了,而父亲却任那个小三放肆,还把她带到了家里,小三对母亲指手画脚,母亲最后实在受不了就自杀了,而小三就成了这个家的女主人了,伊灵向慕容云希提出要出国,慕容云希便答应了。他——白未烯,世界第一首富的公子,性格冷漠,让人无法靠近,可是在酒吧碰到伊灵后,他变了(那时候伊灵已经回国了)冰山碰到女王会有什么是发什呢?他们是否会擦出爱情的火花呢?让我们看下去吧!