登陆注册
14817900000001

第1章

The Cratylus has always been a source of perplexity to the student of Plato. While in fancy and humour, and perfection of style and metaphysical originality, this dialogue may be ranked with the best of the Platonic writings, there has been an uncertainty about the motive of the piece, which interpreters have hitherto not succeeded in dispelling. We need not suppose that Plato used words in order to conceal his thoughts, or that he would have been unintelligible to an educated contemporary. In the Phaedrus and Euthydemus we also find a difficulty in determining the precise aim of the author. Plato wrote satires in the form of dialogues, and his meaning, like that of other satirical writers, has often slept in the ear of posterity. Two causes may be assigned for this obscurity: 1st, the subtlety and allusiveness of this species of composition; 2nd, the difficulty of reproducing a state of life and literature which has passed away. A satire is unmeaning unless we can place ourselves back among the persons and thoughts of the age in which it was written. Had the treatise of Antisthenes upon words, or the speculations of Cratylus, or some other Heracleitean of the fourth century B.C., on the nature of language been preserved to us; or if we had lived at the time, and been 'rich enough to attend the fifty-drachma course of Prodicus,' we should have understood Plato better, and many points which are now attributed to the extravagance of Socrates' humour would have been found, like the allusions of Aristophanes in the Clouds, to have gone home to the sophists and grammarians of the day.

For the age was very busy with philological speculation; and many questions were beginning to be asked about language which were parallel to other questions about justice, virtue, knowledge, and were illustrated in a similar manner by the analogy of the arts. Was there a correctness in words, and were they given by nature or convention? In the presocratic philosophy mankind had been striving to attain an expression of their ideas, and now they were beginning to ask themselves whether the expression might not be distinguished from the idea? They were also seeking to distinguish the parts of speech and to enquire into the relation of subject and predicate. Grammar and logic were moving about somewhere in the depths of the human soul, but they were not yet awakened into consciousness and had not found names for themselves, or terms by which they might be expressed. Of these beginnings of the study of language we know little, and there necessarily arises an obscurity when the surroundings of such a work as the Cratylus are taken away. Moreover, in this, as in most of the dialogues of Plato, allowance has to be made for the character of Socrates.

For the theory of language can only be propounded by him in a manner which is consistent with his own profession of ignorance. Hence his ridicule of the new school of etymology is interspersed with many declarations 'that he knows nothing,' 'that he has learned from Euthyphro,' and the like. Even the truest things which he says are depreciated by himself. He professes to be guessing, but the guesses of Plato are better than all the other theories of the ancients respecting language put together.

The dialogue hardly derives any light from Plato's other writings, and still less from Scholiasts and Neoplatonist writers. Socrates must be interpreted from himself, and on first reading we certainly have a difficulty in understanding his drift, or his relation to the two other interlocutors in the dialogue. Does he agree with Cratylus or with Hermogenes, and is he serious in those fanciful etymologies, extending over more than half the dialogue, which he seems so greatly to relish? Or is he serious in part only; and can we separate his jest from his earnest?--Sunt bona, sunt quaedum mediocria, sunt mala plura. Most of them are ridiculously bad, and yet among them are found, as if by accident, principles of philology which are unsurpassed in any ancient writer, and even in advance of any philologer of the last century. May we suppose that Plato, like Lucian, has been amusing his fancy by writing a comedy in the form of a prose dialogue? And what is the final result of the enquiry? Is Plato an upholder of the conventional theory of language, which he acknowledges to be imperfect? or does he mean to imply that a perfect language can only be based on his own theory of ideas? Or if this latter explanation is refuted by his silence, then in what relation does his account of language stand to the rest of his philosophy? Or may we be so bold as to deny the connexion between them? (For the allusion to the ideas at the end of the dialogue is merely intended to show that we must not put words in the place of things or realities, which is a thesis strongly insisted on by Plato in many other passages)...These are some of the first thoughts which arise in the mind of the reader of the Cratylus. And the consideration of them may form a convenient introduction to the general subject of the dialogue.

We must not expect all the parts of a dialogue of Plato to tend equally to some clearly-defined end. His idea of literary art is not the absolute proportion of the whole, such as we appear to find in a Greek temple or statue; nor should his works be tried by any such standard. They have often the beauty of poetry, but they have also the freedom of conversation.

'Words are more plastic than wax' (Rep.), and may be moulded into any form.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 与君共创

    与君共创

    每个人都有自己的一个帝王梦,每个人都想让自己所在的国家繁荣昌盛,为了那心中的梦,那心中的国,让我们一起走进那段血与泪的激情岁月,与君共创我们心中那威仪四方的强国梦!
  • 影之谧歌

    影之谧歌

    黑夜是属于我的黑,暗影只是随我同行的伙伴。黑夜的挽歌在此时唱响,雪舞纷飞,穿梭在林间的精灵,摇曳夜影的裙摆,所有的旅程,只是一首唱不完的黑夜赞歌,从苏醒的黑暗开始,踏上史诗般的征途……
  • 慕斯顿

    慕斯顿

    也许一个转折点就是我们必须经历的,人生不会一帆风顺,但也不会曲折坎坷。相信每个人都幻想过公主与王子般的爱情,亦或者是仗义不弃的友谊,在我们男女主人公的身上就是最明显的例子。在Q市,一所不平凡的大学“慕斯顿”大学,故事就此开始故事大家若是喜欢就请给一些鼓励!?
  • 荼蘼汐灵异事件录

    荼蘼汐灵异事件录

    有人说这个世界上有鬼,有人说这个世界上没有鬼,而我是前者,我相信这个世界上有鬼。
  • 邪武妖巫

    邪武妖巫

    天地不公,毁其传承。灭杀满门,正邪何正。何为正道,何为妖魔。一指剑风,扭转乾坤。九尺风云,天下动荡。
  • 你不入地狱谁入地狱

    你不入地狱谁入地狱

    我长这么大,一共犯了两个让我追悔莫及的错误。第一个是填错了高考志愿,第二个,是得罪了钟原。如果非要用一个成语来形容第一个错误给我带来的影响,那简直就是,生不如死。如果非要用一个成语来形容钟原对我做过的事情,那简直就是,罄竹难书。
  • 相思谋:妃常难娶

    相思谋:妃常难娶

    某日某王府张灯结彩,婚礼进行时,突然不知从哪冒出来一个小孩,对着新郎道:“爹爹,今天您的大婚之喜,娘亲让我来还一样东西。”说完提着手中的玉佩在新郎面前晃悠。此话一出,一府宾客哗然,然当大家看清这小孩与新郎如一个模子刻出来的面容时,顿时石化。此时某屋顶,一个绝色女子不耐烦的声音响起:“儿子,事情办完了我们走,别在那磨矶,耽误时间。”新郎一看屋顶上的女子,当下怒火攻心,扔下新娘就往女子所在的方向扑去,吼道:“女人,你给本王站住。”一场爱与被爱的追逐正式开始、、、、、、、
  • 镜中佛门

    镜中佛门

    他是宗门杂役弟子,自幼贫苦,为了在乱世之中存活,他修炼刻苦,可惜天赋低劣,十余载的修行却毫无寸进……《镜中佛门》
  • 古顼琴

    古顼琴

    她是21世纪韩流歌手,却被她的前世渡了魂魄,穿越到古时。前世她是守护人间的女尊,这世她只为他翩翩而来,为了前世她未圆的心结,这次她是他的徒弟,世人反对,仙人唾骂,那又如何,只为他来
  • 糖尿病保健(家庭医疗保健全书)

    糖尿病保健(家庭医疗保健全书)

    糖尿病是主要因胰岛素相对或绝对不足而引起的以糖代谢紊乱、血糖增高为主的一组慢性疾病。由各种原因造成的胰岛素供应不足或胰岛素在靶细胞不能发挥正常生理作用,使体内糖、蛋白质及脂肪代谢发生紊乱,而发生糖尿病。随着糖尿病得病时间的延长,体内的代谢紊乱如得不到很好的控制,可导致眼、肾、神经、血管和心脏等组织、器官的慢性并发症,以致最终发生失明、下肢坏疽、尿毒症、脑卒中或心肌梗死,甚至危及生命。