登陆注册
14725400000021

第21章 CHARMIDES, OR TEMPERANCE(6)

That is true, I said; but still each of these sciences has a subject which is different from the science. I can show you that the art of computation has to do with odd and even numbers in their numerical relations to themselves and to each other. Is not that true?

Yes, he said.

And the odd and even numbers are not the same with the art of computation?

They are not.

The art of weighing, again, has to do with lighter and heavier; but the art of weighing is one thing, and the heavy and the light another. Do you admit that?

Yes.

Now, I want to know, what is that which is not wisdom, and of which wisdom is the science?

You are just falling into the old error, Socrates, he said. You come asking in what wisdom or temperance differs from the other sciences, and then you try to discover some respect in which they are alike; but they are not, for all the other sciences are of something else, and not of themselves; wisdom alone is a science of other sciences, and of itself.

And of this, as I believe, you are very well aware: and that you are only doing what you denied that you were doing just now, trying to refute me, instead of pursuing the argument.

And what if I am? How can you think that I have any other motive in refuting you but what I should have in examining into myself? which motive would be just a fear of my unconsciously fancying that I knew something of which I was ignorant. And at this moment I pursue the argument chiefly for my own sake, and perhaps in some degree also for the sake of my other friends. For is not the discovery of things as they truly are, a good common to all mankind?

Yes, certainly, Socrates, he said.

Then, I said, be cheerful, sweet sir, and give your opinion in answer to the question which I asked, never minding whether Critias or Socrates is the person refuted; attend only to the argument, and see what will come of the refutation.

I think that you are right, he replied; and I will do as you say.

Tell me, then, I said, what you mean to affirm about wisdom.

I mean to say that wisdom is the only science which is the science of itself as well as of the other sciences.

But the science of science, I said, will also be the science of the absence of science.

Very true, he said.

Then the wise or temperate man, and he only, will know himself, and be able to examine what he knows or does not know, and to see what others know and think that they know and do really know; and what they do not know, and fancy that they know, when they do not. No other person will be able to do this. And this is wisdom and temperance and self-knowledge--for a man to know what he knows, and what he does not know. That is your meaning?

Yes, he said.

Now then, I said, making an offering of the third or last argument to Zeus the Saviour, let us begin again, and ask, in the first place, whether it is or is not possible for a person to know that he knows and does not know what he knows and does not know; and in the second place, whether, if perfectly possible, such knowledge is of any use.

That is what we have to consider, he said.

And here, Critias, I said, I hope that you will find a way out of a difficulty into which I have got myself. Shall I tell you the nature of the difficulty?

By all means, he replied.

Does not what you have been saying, if true, amount to this: that there must be a single science which is wholly a science of itself and of other sciences, and that the same is also the science of the absence of science?

Yes.

But consider how monstrous this proposition is, my friend: in any parallel case, the impossibility will be transparent to you.

How is that? and in what cases do you mean?

In such cases as this: Suppose that there is a kind of vision which is not like ordinary vision, but a vision of itself and of other sorts of vision, and of the defect of them, which in seeing sees no colour, but only itself and other sorts of vision: Do you think that there is such a kind of vision?

Certainly not.

Or is there a kind of hearing which hears no sound at all, but only itself and other sorts of hearing, or the defects of them?

There is not.

Or take all the senses: can you imagine that there is any sense of itself and of other senses, but which is incapable of perceiving the objects of the senses?

I think not.

Could there be any desire which is not the desire of any pleasure, but of itself, and of all other desires?

Certainly not.

Or can you imagine a wish which wishes for no good, but only for itself and all other wishes?

I should answer, No.

Or would you say that there is a love which is not the love of beauty, but of itself and of other loves?

I should not.

Or did you ever know of a fear which fears itself or other fears, but has no object of fear?

I never did, he said.

Or of an opinion which is an opinion of itself and of other opinions, and which has no opinion on the subjects of opinion in general?

Certainly not.

But surely we are assuming a science of this kind, which, having no subject-matter, is a science of itself and of the other sciences?

Yes, that is what is affirmed.

But how strange is this, if it be indeed true: we must not however as yet absolutely deny the possibility of such a science; let us rather consider the matter.

You are quite right.

Well then, this science of which we are speaking is a science of something, and is of a nature to be a science of something?

Yes.

Just as that which is greater is of a nature to be greater than something else? (Socrates is intending to show that science differs from the object of science, as any other relative differs from the object of relation. But where there is comparison--greater, less, heavier, lighter, and the like--a relation to self as well as to other things involves an absolute contradiction; and in other cases, as in the case of the senses, is hardly conceivable. The use of the genitive after the comparative in Greek, (Greek), creates an unavoidable obscurity in the translation.)Yes.

Which is less, if the other is conceived to be greater?

To be sure.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 尊武往生

    尊武往生

    第一卷是序卷,第二卷正文。为了往生登天,为了修得长生。我走过了人间黄泉路。我没有王霸之气,我只孤身一人,但我将手握大刀,进得诸天万界!这把大刀,必战的过天!斗的过地!我要看看这诸天万界——神佛何在,仙路可存。为了这条路,我放弃了我有的一切。如若不死,终有那一天。这天将遮不住我的眼,轮回也勾不走我的魂。在这里,只可——以我为尊!
  • 顶落

    顶落

    斗争,现实,百味人生,酸甜苦辣,就像整个无法跨越的一度围墙
  • 噬魂惊变

    噬魂惊变

    何谓真实?何谓虚假?连自我真实都无法证明,又如何证明这个世界的真实?被亲人遗忘,被世界抛弃,灾难不断,异变突起!这一切,是一场游戏,还是一个阴谋?当时那块玉米地离我的身体只有0.00公分,但是四分之一注香之后,这块地的男主人将会彻底的忘记我,因为我当时干了一件逗逼的事,虽然本人平时干了无数逗逼事,但是这一件,我认为是最蛋疼的!是的!看见饱满健硕的玉米,我忍不住偷了几个,可是回到家我才发现,爹妈不识我,妹骂我变态,腹中无食衬,偷吃被追逐!乡里乡亲的,两个包子都不让我吃!唉,以后再也不偷玉米了!
  • 星魂载体

    星魂载体

    看一个穿越之后的少年如何在这个世界立足,“哼!公平?只有拳头大,才能给你公平。你的拳头大你就是神”孔元龙挥着拳头说到。本文更新缓慢,请个位大神见谅。
  • 我的当家大小姐

    我的当家大小姐

    【宠文+奇幻】两个性格迥异的人,一场猝不及防的车祸,一次绝妙的机会,身份就此互换。“如果你认识她,如果你了解她你就不会怀疑她,更不会质疑我对她的喜爱。”“就算你不优雅不美丽不贤惠甚至泼辣野蛮无情无义无理取闹刁蛮任性可我还是爱你,不管你变成什么样,我只是爱你这个人,爱你的灵魂。”
  • 梦约初见

    梦约初见

    梦里与初次相遇,有你的时光真好,我们都是幸运的,一直没有寻觅到的东西,其实就在我们的身边,只是暂时没有找到罢了,缘分到了自然就会出现在你的视线内…
  • 所有等待都是一场情深意长

    所有等待都是一场情深意长

    多年以前,他们是小舅舅和外甥女,懵懂无知,情根深种,然而在爱情的战役里,她成了逃兵;多年之后的重逢,她决定与他并肩战斗,因为他们明白他们的等待都是一场情深意长。
  • 同居非男友

    同居非男友

    room1.Nut终于和她的初恋住在同一个屋檐下了,但是没有想到,Link竟然是个Gay,而他的男友Dumb又向他求婚了,Nut的恋情是就此终止还是一个新的开始呢?room2.梦中人你有没有连续几个梦都是接着的?那就是你的梦中情人对你发出的爱情信号!room3.亚当之恋她是研究生,因为要写毕业论文而找到她,而她却发现她拥有亚当的身体,而这个女研究生却是黑龙会的继承人?!room4.苹果山庄柔丝和布莱克是一对同母异父的姐弟,两人相依为命艰苦生活,布莱克原本是一个天真的少年,但当他的姐姐被父亲凌辱,他立誓报仇,而姐姐下葬那天,是他复仇之钟敲响的时刻……(苹果山谷太过残酷和忧郁,像一块石头堵在作者胸口,本不想上传……如果有过份之处,希望各位看客多多原谅……O任打任骂……有些表现马萨残酷的文字被Cut了,所以,俺今后会老老实实做人,那些会被cut的文字还是留在俺的电脑里吧……呜呜呜,又见不到天日了……)room5.TheLoverInTheMirror(因规定题目不能超过20字,标题在此完现!)妮可是一个普通的白领,刚刚失恋,当她回家却发现有一个不分男女并且和她相貌一样的家伙出现在家里,还赖着不走了!真是恼人!这个不知道是弟弟还是妹妹的家伙要折磨她到什么时候啊?!篇首因不清楚陌生人的性别,故称做“它”。
  • 神皇祭

    神皇祭

    天降神书,造就了一个绝世天才……这是一个逆天强者为红颜,为亲人,为朋友征战天下的故事!昆仑界,修行文明正处于快速发展的阶段,百族征战,混乱不堪。在这里,有一个人将会留下一个不可超越的神话!
  • 阿殁

    阿殁

    他说一生一世一双人;他说从此萧郎是路人;他说听过最好的曲子是你的笑声;他说见过最好的烟花是你的眼睛……