登陆注册
14725400000020

第20章 CHARMIDES, OR TEMPERANCE(5)

O Critias, I said, no sooner had you opened your mouth, than I pretty well knew that you would call that which is proper to a man, and that which is his own, good; and that the makings (Greek) of the good you would call doings (Greek), for I am no stranger to the endless distinctions which Prodicus draws about names. Now I have no objection to your giving names any signification which you please, if you will only tell me what you mean by them. Please then to begin again, and be a little plainer. Do you mean that this doing or making, or whatever is the word which you would use, of good actions, is temperance?

I do, he said.

Then not he who does evil, but he who does good, is temperate?

Yes, he said; and you, friend, would agree.

No matter whether I should or not; just now, not what I think, but what you are saying, is the point at issue.

Well, he answered; I mean to say, that he who does evil, and not good, is not temperate; and that he is temperate who does good, and not evil: for temperance I define in plain words to be the doing of good actions.

And you may be very likely right in what you are saying; but I am curious to know whether you imagine that temperate men are ignorant of their own temperance?

I do not think so, he said.

And yet were you not saying, just now, that craftsmen might be temperate in doing another's work, as well as in doing their own?

I was, he replied; but what is your drift?

I have no particular drift, but I wish that you would tell me whether a physician who cures a patient may do good to himself and good to another also?

I think that he may.

And he who does so does his duty?

Yes.

And does not he who does his duty act temperately or wisely?

Yes, he acts wisely.

But must the physician necessarily know when his treatment is likely to prove beneficial, and when not? or must the craftsman necessarily know when he is likely to be benefited, and when not to be benefited, by the work which he is doing?

I suppose not.

Then, I said, he may sometimes do good or harm, and not know what he is himself doing, and yet, in doing good, as you say, he has done temperately or wisely. Was not that your statement?

Yes.

Then, as would seem, in doing good, he may act wisely or temperately, and be wise or temperate, but not know his own wisdom or temperance?

But that, Socrates, he said, is impossible; and therefore if this is, as you imply, the necessary consequence of any of my previous admissions, I will withdraw them, rather than admit that a man can be temperate or wise who does not know himself; and I am not ashamed to confess that I was in error. For self-knowledge would certainly be maintained by me to be the very essence of knowledge, and in this I agree with him who dedicated the inscription, 'Know thyself!' at Delphi. That word, if I am not mistaken, is put there as a sort of salutation which the god addresses to those who enter the temple; as much as to say that the ordinary salutation of 'Hail!'

is not right, and that the exhortation 'Be temperate!' would be a far better way of saluting one another. The notion of him who dedicated the inscription was, as I believe, that the god speaks to those who enter his temple, not as men speak; but, when a worshipper enters, the first word which he hears is 'Be temperate!' This, however, like a prophet he expresses in a sort of riddle, for 'Know thyself!' and 'Be temperate!' are the same, as I maintain, and as the letters imply (Greek), and yet they may be easily misunderstood; and succeeding sages who added 'Never too much,'

or, 'Give a pledge, and evil is nigh at hand,' would appear to have so misunderstood them; for they imagined that 'Know thyself!' was a piece of advice which the god gave, and not his salutation of the worshippers at their first coming in; and they dedicated their own inscription under the idea that they too would give equally useful pieces of advice. Shall I tell you, Socrates, why I say all this? My object is to leave the previous discussion (in which I know not whether you or I are more right, but, at any rate, no clear result was attained), and to raise a new one in which I will attempt to prove, if you deny, that temperance is self-knowledge.

Yes, I said, Critias; but you come to me as though I professed to know about the questions which I ask, and as though I could, if I only would, agree with you. Whereas the fact is that I enquire with you into the truth of that which is advanced from time to time, just because I do not know;and when I have enquired, I will say whether I agree with you or not.

Please then to allow me time to reflect.

Reflect, he said.

I am reflecting, I replied, and discover that temperance, or wisdom, if implying a knowledge of anything, must be a science, and a science of something.

Yes, he said; the science of itself.

Is not medicine, I said, the science of health?

True.

And suppose, I said, that I were asked by you what is the use or effect of medicine, which is this science of health, I should answer that medicine is of very great use in producing health, which, as you will admit, is an excellent effect.

Granted.

And if you were to ask me, what is the result or effect of architecture, which is the science of building, I should say houses, and so of other arts, which all have their different results. Now I want you, Critias, to answer a similar question about temperance, or wisdom, which, according to you, is the science of itself. Admitting this view, I ask of you, what good work, worthy of the name wise, does temperance or wisdom, which is the science of itself, effect? Answer me.

That is not the true way of pursuing the enquiry, Socrates, he said; for wisdom is not like the other sciences, any more than they are like one another: but you proceed as if they were alike. For tell me, he said, what result is there of computation or geometry, in the same sense as a house is the result of building, or a garment of weaving, or any other work of any other art? Can you show me any such result of them? You cannot.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 重生之毒医女帝

    重生之毒医女帝

    上官驰登基之日,一把匕首刺入她的心脏,一尸两命。在她耳边说着“朕怎么可能喜欢你这样诡计多端的女子,朕的皇后就该是碧儿那样温婉贤淑的。”上官驰那张狰狞脸便是云殃对这世界最后的印象。一朝醒来,云殃回到自己十岁这年。云殃势要改变自己的命运,拜师奇遇,一手毒术出神入化。偶遇神医美男,从此二人联手斗国师,斗渣男,各种斗。片段一:“云儿,你的毒药对我没用的。”美男一笑倾国倾城。“呸呸呸,谁是云儿啊。我是男的,男的!”“哦?既是如此不若跟为兄一同沐浴吧。”“唉,有话好好说,别动手动脚的。”片段二:“你,你说什么?”上官驰口吐鲜血,惊恐的瞪大了双眼。“下地府再好好想吧。”云殃双目赤红,如同修罗一般。
  • 东海王

    东海王

    武林传作者:钟如允宣和五年﹛1123年﹜宋江率领水泊梁山一百担八将征讨方腊班师回朝,手下兄弟死得死,亡得亡,只剩下三十几人,混江龙李俊带着童威、童猛、费保等四人去了化外国,做了暹罗国主,入云龙公孙胜回师父蓟州罗真人处继续修炼,神机军师朱武、混世魔王樊瑞二人拜公孙胜为师出家,神行太保戴宗去泰安岳庙陪堂出家,神医安道全、紫髯伯皇甫瑞、玉臂匠金大坚、圣手书生萧让、铁叫子乐和为朝廷所用,
  • 俱灭天地

    俱灭天地

    一个重生的人,重获新生热爱生命和珍惜亲人的人,为了这一切不断奋斗拼搏战斗的历史。绝对精彩,不容错过。
  • 倾世舞姬:偷心的妖精

    倾世舞姬:偷心的妖精

    她,只有一半灵魂,终于,两部分灵魂合二为一。可是谁能告诉她,为什么她刚穿越过来的第一件事就是逃亡!他,原本以为只是一时兴起,想要她,谁料日久生情,怕伤害到她。可是,谁又能告诉他,这年头的女孩是不是都像她一样难追!
  • 逃出香巴拉

    逃出香巴拉

    为了追一个逃兵,他们身陷危险!不论是南极冰盖下的古文明,还是沉入海底的城市,似乎都在昭示着不远的将来,世界将会陷进一个充满不可思议的恐怖的时代。
  • 天河神尊

    天河神尊

    林辰在一次偶然得到了一片星河域场,域场之中可以创造出道道透明人影,别人修炼只是一个人修炼,可是他却可以让十个,百个透明人影帮助他修炼。从此走上了一条飞速修炼的王者道路!!
  • 大神一笑很倾城

    大神一笑很倾城

    “被”一夜脱单。绯闻对象还是那个人设爆炸,光环闪耀,万人仰慕的高岭之花——顾校草?!白远宁同学表示这锅咱,背不起。好不容易发了一则澄清帖子,竟然被校草本尊回复无聊?而且素闻校草大人有洁癖,收个女生发的传单都要洗上三次手。那为何一而再再而三,树咚壁咚沙发咚她?唔……我可不可以理解为你在撩我?顺便~求【收藏√】【【票票√】【评论√】
  • 相思谋:妃常难娶

    相思谋:妃常难娶

    某日某王府张灯结彩,婚礼进行时,突然不知从哪冒出来一个小孩,对着新郎道:“爹爹,今天您的大婚之喜,娘亲让我来还一样东西。”说完提着手中的玉佩在新郎面前晃悠。此话一出,一府宾客哗然,然当大家看清这小孩与新郎如一个模子刻出来的面容时,顿时石化。此时某屋顶,一个绝色女子不耐烦的声音响起:“儿子,事情办完了我们走,别在那磨矶,耽误时间。”新郎一看屋顶上的女子,当下怒火攻心,扔下新娘就往女子所在的方向扑去,吼道:“女人,你给本王站住。”一场爱与被爱的追逐正式开始、、、、、、、
  • 腹黑萌帝擒傻后

    腹黑萌帝擒傻后

    一朝穿成傻妞,父王不疼,母后不爱,姐妹陷害,兄弟痛恨,所谓夫君欲杀之而后快!更要命的是还怀了孕。莫伊霸气冲天:“没关系,傻妞就傻妞呗!不就气气皇后,斗斗公主,戏戏皇子,顺便再生个娃儿玩转这异世大陆嘛!何难之有?”本文纯属虚构,请勿模仿。
  • 婚然心动

    婚然心动

    “总裁,夫人刚给肖经理推销了一个娃娃。”墨翟满脸黑色,秘书小声的解释道:“夫人说了,这叫上行下效!”“总裁,夫人刚给员工发了一千套冈本!夫人说了,这是与民同乐!”“总裁,夫人……”“你别说了,她又推销了什么?情趣用品的生意都做到公司来了,有本事了,一把火给她烧了!”墨翟忍无可忍的朝秘书怒吼!“嗯……这次不是,夫人说了,她要趁宝宝没生下来之前,来一场说走就走的旅行!”什么?宝宝?这女人怀了孕还敢乱跑?“你去告诉她,钱包那么瘪,让她省省吧!”