登陆注册
14725400000010

第10章 PREFACE TO THE SECOND AND THIRD EDITIONS.(7)

(1) First, the foundation of his argument is laid in the Metaphysics of Aristotle. But we cannot argue, either from the Metaphysics, or from any other of the philosophical treatises of Aristotle, to the dialogues of Plato until we have ascertained the relation in which his so-called works stand to the philosopher himself. There is of course no doubt of the great influence exercised upon Greece and upon the world by Aristotle and his philosophy. But on the other hand almost every one who is capable of understanding the subject acknowledges that his writings have not come down to us in an authentic form like most of the dialogues of Plato. How much of them is to be ascribed to Aristotle's own hand, how much is due to his successors in the Peripatetic School, is a question which has never been determined, and probably never can be, because the solution of it depends upon internal evidence only. To 'the height of this great argument' I do not propose to ascend. But one little fact, not irrelevant to the present discussion, will show how hopeless is the attempt to explain Plato out of the writings of Aristotle. In the chapter of the Metaphysics quoted by Dr.

Jackson, about two octavo pages in length, there occur no less than seven or eight references to Plato, although nothing really corresponding to them can be found in his extant writings:--a small matter truly; but what a light does it throw on the character of the entire book in which they occur! We can hardly escape from the conclusion that they are not statements of Aristotle respecting Plato, but of a later generation of Aristotelians respecting a later generation of Platonists. (Compare the striking remark of the great Scaliger respecting the Magna Moralia:--Haec non sunt Aristotelis, tamen utitur auctor Aristotelis nomine tanquam suo.)(2) There is no hint in Plato's own writings that he was conscious of having made any change in the Doctrine of Ideas such as Dr. Jackson attributes to him, although in the Republic the platonic Socrates speaks of 'a longer and a shorter way', and of a way in which his disciple Glaucon 'will be unable to follow him'; also of a way of Ideas, to which he still holds fast, although it has often deserted him (Philebus, Phaedo), and although in the later dialogues and in the Laws the reference to Ideas disappears, and Mind claims her own (Phil.; Laws). No hint is given of what Plato meant by the 'longer way' (Rep.), or 'the way in which Glaucon was unable to follow'; or of the relation of Mind to the Ideas. It might be said with truth that the conception of the Idea predominates in the first half of the Dialogues, which, according to the order adopted in this work, ends with the Republic, the 'conception of Mind' and a way of speaking more in agreement with modern terminology, in the latter half.

But there is no reason to suppose that Plato's theory, or, rather, his various theories, of the Ideas underwent any definite change during his period of authorship. They are substantially the same in the twelfth Book of the Laws as in the Meno and Phaedo; and since the Laws were written in the last decade of his life, there is no time to which this change of opinions can be ascribed. It is true that the theory of Ideas takes several different forms, not merely an earlier and a later one, in the various Dialogues. They are personal and impersonal, ideals and ideas, existing by participation or by imitation, one and many, in different parts of his writings or even in the same passage. They are the universal definitions of Socrates, and at the same time 'of more than mortal knowledge' (Rep.). But they are always the negations of sense, of matter, of generation, of the particular: they are always the subjects of knowledge and not of opinion; and they tend, not to diversity, but to unity. Other entities or intelligences are akin to them, but not the same with them, such as mind, measure, limit, eternity, essence (Philebus;Timaeus): these and similar terms appear to express the same truths from a different point of view, and to belong to the same sphere with them. But we are not justified, therefore, in attempting to identify them, any more than in wholly opposing them. The great oppositions of the sensible and intellectual, the unchangeable and the transient, in whatever form of words expressed, are always maintained in Plato. But the lesser logical distinctions, as we should call them, whether of ontology or predication, which troubled the pre-Socratic philosophy and came to the front in Aristotle, are variously discussed and explained. Thus far we admit inconsistency in Plato, but no further. He lived in an age before logic and system had wholly permeated language, and therefore we must not always expect to find in him systematic arrangement or logical precision:--'poema magis putandum.' But he is always true to his own context, the careful study of which is of more value to the interpreter than all the commentators and scholiasts put together.

(3) The conclusions at which Dr. Jackson has arrived are such as might be expected to follow from his method of procedure. For he takes words without regard to their connection, and pieces together different parts of dialogues in a purely arbitrary manner, although there is no indication that the author intended the two passages to be so combined, or that when he appears to be experimenting on the different points of view from which a subject of philosophy may be regarded, he is secretly elaborating a system.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 昊天仙侠传

    昊天仙侠传

    凡人如何?神仙又怎样?还不是在命运之潮中,生来便注定要结束的一场演绎?!“慕容云飞,你因何而执剑?你的道,又在何处?!”“只是为了,在这颠沛流离的世道上,守护我的爱妻、亲友罢了。至于道,我想,在守护与被守护之间,我宁愿选择守护……”“慕容云飞,你可愿牺牲自我,换取三界芸芸众生之平衡?”“我没有那么伟大,但,倘若以我一己性命能够换回我一生守护之人,我死得其所。”
  • 那些年的,记忆

    那些年的,记忆

    林若夕在初中是班上的班花,有刘依茉等好朋友。而身为校草的周辰恰巧也和林若夕在同一个班,而他们有会发生怎样青春的故事呢……
  • 相思谋:妃常难娶

    相思谋:妃常难娶

    某日某王府张灯结彩,婚礼进行时,突然不知从哪冒出来一个小孩,对着新郎道:“爹爹,今天您的大婚之喜,娘亲让我来还一样东西。”说完提着手中的玉佩在新郎面前晃悠。此话一出,一府宾客哗然,然当大家看清这小孩与新郎如一个模子刻出来的面容时,顿时石化。此时某屋顶,一个绝色女子不耐烦的声音响起:“儿子,事情办完了我们走,别在那磨矶,耽误时间。”新郎一看屋顶上的女子,当下怒火攻心,扔下新娘就往女子所在的方向扑去,吼道:“女人,你给本王站住。”一场爱与被爱的追逐正式开始、、、、、、、
  • 夜班夜话

    夜班夜话

    徐如林等六个同事在一天加夜班的时候遭遇了停电,百无聊赖的他们在等电力恢复过程中开始轮流讲起了了灵异惊悚的故事。《漂流瓶》、《温柔的哭泣声》、《宝贝对不起》、《怪邻居》,一个个恐怖有趣的故事从大家口中娓娓道来。就在轮到徐如林讲故事的时候,他却闹了肚子,一个人摸黑去了厕所,不过就在他回来的过程中发生了让他意想不到的事情。
  • 娱乐帝国之我是台长

    娱乐帝国之我是台长

    娱乐帝国从台长开始。“只要和娱乐相关的,我们都要搞。”
  • 极品麻辣王妃

    极品麻辣王妃

    中华美女特种兵,意外穿越到大明成化年间。救太子,订婚约;寻古墓,上演古墓丽影;闹黑市,虎口脱险;惩贪官,救民于水火;调戏四大才子,建造军事强国;不管你是太子、公子,还是将军、侠客、小才子,通通给本宫洗白白等好了。惊险,刺激,轻松,搞笑,啼笑皆非,嬉笑怒骂,一代刁蛮性感王妃,带你闯荡,不一样的大明王朝。【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 家塾教学法

    家塾教学法

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 公民常用法律大全

    公民常用法律大全

    《最新公民常用法律知识大全》分为五编共二十六章,襄括民事法律知识、刑事法律知识、行政法律知识、经济法律知识和怎样打官司等五大方面法律基本知识,采用一问一答的形式,从法律基本知识、民事法律为、婚姻家庭、财产继承等方面对最常用的法律知识作了简约明了的阐述。
  • 将狂

    将狂

    一代术炼宗师百里昊天,冲击神阶意外陨落,却得狂之篇章重生为将门纨绔楚皓轩。从此,世界开始陷入他的狂潮当中。前世无法修炼?今世我将加冕武帝至尊,冲击神阶武境。百花丛中过片叶不沾身?开玩笑,朵朵红颜为我开才对。丹药玄器很厉害?丹药我当豆子吃,玄器来泡妞。武帝你就给我狂了?先给我趴着,我体内封印的狂气压制不住了。
  • 福妻驾到

    福妻驾到

    现代饭店彪悍老板娘魂穿古代。不分是非的极品婆婆?三年未归生死不明的丈夫?心狠手辣的阴毒亲戚?贪婪而好色的地主老财?吃上顿没下顿的贫困宭境?不怕不怕,神仙相助,一技在手,天下我有!且看现代张悦娘,如何身带福气玩转古代,开面馆、收小弟、左纳财富,右傍美男,共绘幸福生活大好蓝图!!!!快本新书《天媒地聘》已经上架开始销售,只要3.99元即可将整本书抱回家,你还等什么哪,赶紧点击下面的直通车,享受乐乐精心为您准备的美食盛宴吧!)