登陆注册
15752600000093

第93章

I have enumerated the four Contracts in their historical order, which order, however, the Roman Institutional writers did not invariably follow. There can be no doubt that the Verbal Contract was the most ancient of the four, and that it is the eldest known descendant of the primitive Nexum. Several species of Verbal Contract were anciently in use, but the most important of all, and the only one treated of by our authorities, was effected by means of a stipulation, that is, a Question and Answer; a question addressed by the person who exacted the promise, and an answer given by the person who made it. This question and answer constituted the additional ingredient which, as I have just explained, was demanded by the primitive notion over and above the mere agreement of the persons interested. They formed the agency by which the Obligation was annexed. The old Nexum has now bequeathed to maturer jurisprudence first of all the conception of a chain uniting the contracting parties, and this has become the Obligation. It has further transmitted the notion of a ceremonial accompanying and consecrating the engagement, and this ceremonial has been transmuted into the Stipulation. The conversion of the solemn conveyance, which was the prominent feature of the original Nexum, into a mere question and answer, would be more of a mystery than it is if we had not the analogous history of Roman Testaments to enlighten us.

Looking to that history, we can understand how the formal Conveyance was first separated from the part of the proceeding which had immediate reference to the business in hand, and how afterwards it was omitted altogether. As then the question and answer of the Stipulation were unquestionably the Nexum in a simplified shape, we are prepared to find that they long partook of the nature of a technical form. It would be a mistake to consider them as exclusively recommending themselves to the older Roman Lawyers through their usefulness in furnishing persons meditating an agreement with an opportunity for consideration and reflection. It is not to be disputed that they had a value of this kind, which was gradually recognised; but there is proof that their function in respect to Contracts was at first formal and ceremonial in the statement of our authorities, that not every question and answer was of old sufficient to constitute a Stipulation, but only a question and answer couched in technical phraseology specially appropriated to the particular occasion.

But although it is essential for the proper appreciation of the history of contract-law that the Stipulation should be understood to have been looked upon as a solemn form before it was recognised as a useful security, it would be wrong on the other hand to shut our eyes to its real usefulness. The Verbal Contract, though it had lost much of its ancient importance, survived to the latest period of Roman juris prudence; and we may take it for granted that no institution of Roman law had so extended a longevity unless it served some practical advantage. Iobserve in an English writer some expressions of surprise that the Romans even of the earliest times were content with so meagre a protection against haste and irreflection. But on examining the Stipulation closely, and remembering that we have to do with a state of society in which written evidence was not easily procurable, I think we must admit that this Question and Answer, had it been expressly devised to answer the purpose which it served, would have been justly designated a highly ingenious expedient. It was the promisee who, in the character of stipulator, put all the terms of the contract into the form of a question, and the answer was given by the promisor. "Do you promise that you will deliver me such and such a slave, at such and such a place, on such and such a day?" "I do promise." Now, if we reflect for a moment, we shall see that this obligation to put the promise interrogatively inverts the natural position of the parties, and, by effectually breaking the tenor of the conversation, prevents the attention from gliding over a dangerous pledge. With us, a verbal promise is, generally speaking, to be gathered exclusively from the words of the promisor. In old Roman law, another step was absolutely required;it was necessary for the promisee, after the agreement had been made, to sum up all its terms in a solemn interrogation; and it was of this interrogation, of course, and of the assent to it, that proof had to be given at the trial -- not of the promise, which was not in itself binding. How great a difference this seemingly insignificant peculiarity may make in the phraseology of contract-law is speedily realised by the beginner in Roman jurisprudence, one of whose first stumbling-blocks is almost universally created by it. When we in English have occasion, in mentioning a contract, to connect it for convenience' sake with one of the parties -- for example, if we wished to speak generally of a contractor -- it is always the promisor at whom our words are pointing. But the general language of Roman law takes a different turn; it always regards the contract, if we may so speak, from the point of view of the promisee. in Speaking of a party to a contract, it is always the Stipulator, the person who asks the question, who is primarily alluded to. But the serviceableness of the stipulation is most vividly illustrated by referring to the actual examples in the pages of the Latin comic dramatists. If the entire scenes are read down in which these passages occur (ex. gra. Plautus, Pseudolus, Act I. sc. i; Act IV. sc. 6; Trinummus, Act V. sc. 2), it will be perceived how effectually the attention of the person meditating the promise must have been arrested by the question, and how ample was the opportunity for withdrawal from an improvident undertaking.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 兰柯,一梦

    兰柯,一梦

    一个人称“平成年代”的福尔摩斯,“日本警察的救世主”的高中生侦探工藤新一。因为试图跟踪黑衣组织成员而被偷袭,而被灌下代号“APTX4869”的毒药。虽然幸免于死,但身体就此缩小成一年级小学生的模样。之后寻求阿笠博士的帮助,在被青梅竹马询问其名字时,化名为江户川柯南。在阿笠博士的提议下,寄住于小兰父亲毛利小五郎家中,不仅解决着各种案件,并且秘密调查黑衣组织。
  • 我的神仙不可能这么逗逼

    我的神仙不可能这么逗逼

    秀恩爱版雷公和电母、天天挨打版巨灵神、暴力多动症版哪吒……李逍遥看着聊天群里面的逗逼对话,真心想大喊:“神仙怎么都是这样的逗逼!”
  • 粉红春梦

    粉红春梦

    什么?我勾引你?她瞪大眼睛,简直不能相信面前这个人的话.这人脸皮还真是厚啊.是你勾引我的好吗?我为什么要勾引你?你谁啊?她气愤.最近真是走霉运,失恋,没工作,现在连贞洁也丢了.天!我勾引你?我需要这样做吗?追我的女人都能排到三环以外呢!他洋洋得意.郑浩天万万没想到自己后来竟然被这个小女人吃得死死的!
  • 异界的兑换空间

    异界的兑换空间

    来到这个陌生的地方,肉身穿的感觉很不错。靠着一个莫名其妙幻想出来的兑换空间,我玩转了这个世界。
  • 乾清宫女官

    乾清宫女官

    婚礼前的小小心愿,竟把夏小西带回了将近六百年前的大明朝永乐年间。小西整理好心绪,开始坦然的面对熟悉的陌生人。信心满满的她幼稚的以为可以掌握全局,却不知道一股强悍的力量正一步步的向自己逼近。局面陷入混乱,小西只得低头求助。大局稳定后,小西却再也不能淡定,只一个眼神就被彻底俘获,乖乖袒露了心事。不计一切的默默守护真的能换来如愿以偿的结果吗?【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 兄弟姐妹之发现真爱却被毁了

    兄弟姐妹之发现真爱却被毁了

    自己好不容易发现了真爱,却被她亲手毁了。
  • 颜倾盛世:极品娘子要翻天

    颜倾盛世:极品娘子要翻天

    她是21世纪的冷血杀手,身上带着神奇的阴阳法术。一朝穿越,看美男,携萌宠,带神器,纤纤细手杀于全天下!嗯?那个传说中的病秧三王爷是她的未婚夫?似乎不是病秧子嘛!武功高强绝色容颜,独宠她一人!“阡陌尘,如果我被人欺负了怎么办?”“谁欺负我娘子,我欺负他全家。”“你,怎么欺负他全家?”“杀无赦!”神秘遗情咒,索命忘情丹,解药偏偏是同一种。一边是她最爱的男人,一边是她最喜欢的灵宠。她,该如何选择?棋局,才刚开始。【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 福妻驾到

    福妻驾到

    现代饭店彪悍老板娘魂穿古代。不分是非的极品婆婆?三年未归生死不明的丈夫?心狠手辣的阴毒亲戚?贪婪而好色的地主老财?吃上顿没下顿的贫困宭境?不怕不怕,神仙相助,一技在手,天下我有!且看现代张悦娘,如何身带福气玩转古代,开面馆、收小弟、左纳财富,右傍美男,共绘幸福生活大好蓝图!!!!快本新书《天媒地聘》已经上架开始销售,只要3.99元即可将整本书抱回家,你还等什么哪,赶紧点击下面的直通车,享受乐乐精心为您准备的美食盛宴吧!)
  • 梦只因你

    梦只因你

    她是一个普普通通的女孩,却因与他的相遇,让她的世界发生了改变,她从未奢望能够与他相遇,相识,相恋...........
  • 夜黑风高:隋魔医馆

    夜黑风高:隋魔医馆

    有这么一家神秘莫测的医馆。他们白天闭门休息,晚上打灯营业。特别是在夜黑风高之时,他们还会打着灯笼到竹林深处去看有没有需要帮助的病人。他们并不被老百姓看好,有人说他们是妖,有人说他们是道士,也有人认为这里面就没有什么医生,就是一个古时候留下来的破旧医馆……