登陆注册
15752600000083

第83章

I pass by with brief mention another expedient having thesame object with the last, which, though it did not immediatelymake its appearance in English legal history, was of immemorialantiquity in Roman law. such indeed is its apparent age that someGerman civilians, not sufficiently aware of the light thrown onthe subject by the analogies of English law, have thought it evenolder than the Mancipation. I speak of the Cessio in Jure, acollusive recovery, in a Court of law of property sought to beconveyed. The plaintiff claimed the subject of this proceedingwith the ordinary forms of a litigation; the defendant madedefault; and the commodity was of course adjudged to theplaintiff. I need scarcely remind the English lawyer that thisexpedient suggested itself to our forefathers, and produced thosefamous Fines and Recoveries which did so much to undo theharshest trammels of the feudal land-law. The Roman and Englishcontrivances have very much in common and illustrate each othermost instructively, but there is this difference between them,that the object of the English lawyers was to removecomplications already introduced into the title, while the Romanjurisconsults sought to prevent them by substituting a mode oftransfer necessarily unimpeachable for one which too oftenmiscarried. The device is, in fact, one which suggests itself assoon as Courts of Law are in steady operation, but arenevertheless still under the empire of primitive notions. In anadvanced state of legal opinion, tribunals regard collusivelitigation as an abuse of their procedure; but there has alwaysbeen a time when, if their forms were scrupulously complied with,they never dreamed of looking further.

The influence of Courts of Law and of their procedure uponProperty has been most extensive, but the subject is too largefor the dimensions of this treatise, and would carry us furtherdown the course of legal history than is consistent with itsscheme. It is desirable, however, to mention, that to thisinfluence we must attribute the importance of the distinctionbetween Property and Possession -- not, indeed, the distinctionitself, which (in the language of an eminent English civilian) isthe same thing as the distinction between the legal right to actupon a thing and the physical power to do so -- but theextraordinary importance which the distinction has obtained inthe philosophy of law. Few educated persons are so little versedin legal literature as not to have heard that the language of the1

the greatest possible perplexity, and that the genius of Savignyis supposed to have chiefly proved itself by the solution whichhe discovered for the enigma. Possession, in fact, when employedby the Roman lawyers, appears to have contracted a shade ofmeaning not easily accounted for. The word, as appears from itsetymology; must have originally denoted physical contact orphysical contact resumeable at pleasure; but, as actually usedwithout any qualifying epithet, it signifies not simply physicaldetention, but physical detention coupled with the intention tohold the thing detained as one's own. Savigny, following Niebuhr,perceived that for this anomaly there could only be a historicalorigin. He pointed out that the Patrician burghers of Rome, whohad become tenants of the greatest part of the public domain atnominal rents, were, in the view of the old Roman law, merepossessors, but then they were possessors intending to keep theirland against all comers. They, in truth, put forward a claimalmost identical with that which has recently been advanced inEngland by the lessees of Church lands. Admitting that in theorythey were the tenants-at-will of the state, they contended thattime and undisturbed enjoyment had ripened their holding into aspecies of ownership, and that it would be unjust to eject themfor the purpose of redistributing the domain. The association ofthis claim with the Patrician tenancies, permanently influencedthe sense of "possession." Meanwhile the only legal remedies ofwhich the tenants could avail themselves, if ejected orthreatened with disturbance, were the Possessory Interdicts,summary processes of Roman law which were either expresslydevised by the Praetor for their protection, or else, accordingto another theory, had in older times been employed for theprovisional maintenance of possessions pending the settlement ofquestions of legal right. It came, therefore, to be understoodthat everybody who possessed property as his own had the power ofdemanding the Interdicts, and, by a system of highly artificialpleading, the Interdictal process was moulded into a shape fittedfor the trial of conflicting claims to a disputed possession.

同类推荐
  • 苇航纪谈

    苇航纪谈

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 逢遇篇

    逢遇篇

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • The Hunchback

    The Hunchback

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 成方切用

    成方切用

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 注华严法界观门

    注华严法界观门

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 宸光

    宸光

    这不仅仅是一个有关青春爱情的故事,这是有关成长的故事,它的背后不是你也不是我,是我们。
  • 远庵僼禅师语录

    远庵僼禅师语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 第七连:丘东平作品精选

    第七连:丘东平作品精选

    本套丛书选文广泛、丰富,且把阅读文学与掌握知识结合起来,既能增进广大读者阅读经典文学的乐趣,又能使我们体悟人生的智慧和生活哲理。本套图书格调高雅,知识丰富,具有极强的可读性、权威性和系统性,非常适合广大读者阅读和收藏,也非常适合各级图书馆装备陈列。
  • 凯少宠妻:萌妻太粘人

    凯少宠妻:萌妻太粘人

    因为公司的事情,她不得不嫁人,可是她内心是完全抗拒的啊!而又在神奇的某一天,身为总裁的他居然把苏家小姐拐回家过上了没羞没臊的生活。【婚后的某一天,她生气的说“我告诉你!你不可以这样的啊!过分了昂!”“我怎么就过分了?”“那些男明星明明好帅的!可你偏说他们丑!”“你信不信我让他们离开这个圈子!”……】【绝对宠啊】
  • 江山美人一锅烩

    江山美人一锅烩

    炒锅一翻尤如天外飞仙,炒勺一握胜过郭靖和杨过,菜刀在手敢问天下谁是英雄!人家修真为长生,他修真只为“吃”,却无端卷入各种旋涡。在这喧嚣人世,且看他如何——横刀长啸把鱼烧,一身正气炒辣椒。扬名四海战天下,只求一博红颜笑。
  • 快穿事务所之攻略不停

    快穿事务所之攻略不停

    没错,温玖年是一个炮灰!但这是一个画风清奇的炮灰,她活的比男女主还要潇洒恣意,她的日常生活就是撩完汉子撩妹子,没事再拆几对CP,来满足自己的恶趣味,小日子过得不要太舒坦。于是,成功逆袭崩了剧情的某人在某一日被一只系统绑定,开始了“艰辛”的逆袭生涯。
  • 当你爱上我

    当你爱上我

    十七岁、冷血、感性、知性,一腔热血。只要你肯付钱就愿意帮你除掉仇人的人,这次却遵从内心想法,以一敌百!只有你想不到,没有他做不到!看冷血杀手变成一代暖男!---别离开我、龙泽
  • 莫问仙乡

    莫问仙乡

    世间传说,灵山福地内有不死仙人,采仙药,炼灵丹,驾云气,御众星。少年顾景历经人生大变,来到众人传颂中的仙山修炼,等待他的是狐妖缱绻,御剑逍遥,还是白发枯骨,刀剑江湖。千年回首处,只道一声“莫问仙乡”
  • 斗龙战士之蓝盈紫诺

    斗龙战士之蓝盈紫诺

    命运总是喜欢捉弄人。或许吧,这默认了许多永远无法改变的事实。哪怕你多么不愿意接受,却也永远无法改变。这就是命。命运之轮会一直转动。或许,它所停在的地方,是你永远无法遐想的。甚至,不会有一丝波澜所动。光明和黑暗,是命运中最大的反差点。两个截然不同的词语,衔接在一起时。便是最痛苦的命运。光明与黑暗,永远只能身投一者。两者是永远无法共存。是永远对立在两岸的人。一个人永远无法承受这两种相差的宿命。站着这两者中的十字路口。它们,必是两种完全不能混合一谈的抉择。这种抉择,往往是最富有难度,最纠结的抉择。力量与心灵的痛苦掺和,命运与友谊的对决,是最为残酷的事实与命。——By,题记,序言。
  • EXO之我们的相遇

    EXO之我们的相遇

    只是一个平凡的巧克力,而让他们相聚。五个月的时光有滋有味,每天差不多都溢满欢笑。日子久了,情也就深了。到分离时谁也不舍得,最终结果会怎么样?最终的爱情之花又会怎样?请关注《EXO之我们的相遇》!