登陆注册
15713600000020

第20章

goods units of value The negative element arises from the indifference with which men naturally regard goods. Only when forced to it, do we transfer our interest from the uses of goods to the goods themselves; and, in the process of transferring, we have to overcome a natural opposition which varies in strength according to the circumstances. The greater the need, the more eager will we be to get possession and keep possession of goods: the smaller in this case will be the opposition. The opposition will be completely broken down where our need rises to extremity, for here we identify our destiny with that of the goods, and in their loss we see our own calamity. On the other hand, the opposition will be complete where everything is present in superfluity; here we can enjoy without any feeling of gratitude for, or interest in, the objects which procure for us the enjoyment. Between extremest need and superfluity the opposition is a graduated one: we bestow upon goods an amount of interest derived from the interest we have in the services they render us. But we do not give them the whole of this interest; we make a certain reservation. That is to say, all the single items of a stock are considered only at the value of their marginal utility. The surplus value, that which goes beyond their marginal utility, is withheld from the goods.

Here, then, is the numerical expression for the strength of this opposition: the negative element in the formation of value is equal to the subtracted surplus value. Making use once again of the foregoing figures, we find that, so long as we own only one good, there is no deduction in the formation of its value; the entire value of the use is transferred, undiminished, to the good. With two goods, on the other hand, there will be a deduction of 1 from the value, as each of these is valued only according to its marginal utility 9, while the utilities of both added together amount to 10 + 9. Three goods have each a value only of 8, and their utility is equal to 10 + 9 + 8, the surplus value deducted being therefore 3. Reckoning further in the same way, we shall find the minus amount in the formation of value as follows: --With a stock of the minus is 1 02 1

3 3

4 6

5 10

6 15

7 21

8 28

9 36

10 45

11 55

goods units of value.

If we put together the plus and minus amounts we shall obtain the following as result: --Positive (+) Negative (-)Residual (+)1 10 0102 19 1183 27 3244 34 6285 40 10306 45 15307 49 21288 52 28249 54 361810 55 451011 55 55 0goods units of value units of value units of value Thus we obtain the same scale as that which resulted from the multiplication of amount by marginal utility.

It is now seen that the apparent irregularity of the scale is really a consequence of the strict regularity of its conditions.

The value of a supply must increase with the increase of its items so long as the positive element preponderates; in other words, so long as the increment of value, furnished by the utility of the newly-acquired good, is greater than the value which is lost through the decrement of value which its addition causes to every good already in the stock. This is the ascending branch of the movement of value, or, as we might call it, the "up grade" of value.

On the other hand, the value of a supply must decrease with its augmentation, whenever the negative element gains the ascendency. This is the descending branch of the movement of value, or the "down grade" of value.

Strange though it seems, the value must touch zero twice in the course of its development: in the one case, where we have nothing; in the other, where we have everything. If we possess nothing, there are no objects to value; if we possess everything, there is -- just on account of the superfluity -- no subjective inducement to an act of valuation. Only if we possess something -- be it much or little -- does the phenomenon of value appear;and between the two zero points, so different in their importance, it has its existence. It presents itself with the first goods that come into our possession, and increases up to a certain culminating point, from which it decreases, until, when superfluity is reached, interest is again completely withdrawn from the goods.

As a matter of fact, human economies move almost entirely in the ascending branch. In most things we are so far from having a superfluity that almost every multiplication of goods shows a corresponding increase in the total value. The single good certainly falls in value as the stock increases, but as a rule we find that the loss in the items is outweighed by the gain on the whole. On this account we are accustomed to measure wealth and riches by the sum of value of their constituent parts, and regard it as a misfortune if the value of property and revenue goes down. And therefore it appears to us paradoxical when, at times, we are forced to notice that, although the amount of goods and of enjoyments, of wealth and well-being, has been augmented, their value has decreased. It may be that exceptionally favourable weather has resulted in an over-abundant harvest; or it may be the discovery of some new productive stratum of unsuspected fertility; or some sudden and enormous increase of returns through advance in technical processes: or it may be caused by some error on the part of the producer, who has been misled by greed of gain, or a mistaken and exaggerated estimate of demand, into too greatly enlarging his production. But it is always some unusual accident when individual branches of economy are transferred to the descending branch in the movement of value. It is improbable that our whole economic system will ever permanently come under such favourable conditions, and production be brought so near to superfluity, that the ascending movement of value will cease to be the dominant one. The example, however, of those few free goods which nature offers leaves us no room for doubt that value disappears whenever superfluity is reached; and this is really the best proof for our contention that value must begin to decrease whenever superfluity approaches. Even though experience shows the scale of value to have many gaps, yet it gives us sufficient facts to let us trace its ideal course from end to end.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 通天之术

    通天之术

    茫茫天地。岁月流转。千载轮回终未灭,一身玄法至通天。一颗无畏之心。一柄青锋长剑。一路生灭不回头,只为心中执念……!为了一道生机,他们灭了他千百个轮回,再回首,早已物是人非。天还是那片天,而人早已化作一捧黄土。一路执着只为求得那心中的真,探寻那萦绕在心头千百万年的疑惑。也许能知晓那最后的答案,可那答案换来的可能是无尽的悲凉……《通天之术》一个不一样的修真故事,那结局会使你意想不到,三界风云、仙魔乱斗,一己之力镇压八荒。那是无上的存在,为求得那真正的道.……
  • 诰命赌妃:倾城笑

    诰命赌妃:倾城笑

    顾清歌稀里糊涂的穿越到一个莫须有的朝代竟然中了春毒?刚好旁边又出现一个裸体男子?顾清歌来不及思考任何东西,迷失在欲望里。从此,她以相府嫡女身份在这个不知名的朝代,掀起一段段孽缘...【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 我的艳鬼老公

    我的艳鬼老公

    我只是个半吊子的风水师,在一次惊变后,我被他所救,却被摸了个精光!就在妊娠反应不断,以为自己怀孕了的时候,一场车祸突然降临,鲜血横流孩子没了踪影。却又在一个月以后,医院告诉我,你的孩子很健康!莫名其妙的鬼婴日夜在我肚子里啼哭,“妈妈,你别不要我……”梦里的红袍男人日夜痴缠,“意如,你为何忘了我?”前路凶险,后路决断,我这天煞孤星命,到底要怎么办。浮屠,你能不能救救我?
  • 天神的爱情战争

    天神的爱情战争

    她是上天的女神,她拥有着无限的只是和能力,却独独不懂爱情,在爱情的战争中她输给了“爱”这个字,所以她决定去凡间寻找答案,茫茫人海中他遇见了他们,可那个属于她的唯一究竟是谁?她又在人间做了什么大事件让许多人又爱又恨?他又陷入了怎样的绝境?
  • 老爹叫我去巡妹子

    老爹叫我去巡妹子

    什么?宁家修真家族的唯一继承人竟然是个废物?做为宁家的继承人宁无缺唯一的利用价值就是传宗接代了,这不老爹老妈让他去巡妹子去了?同桌的龙冉长的不错,可以推倒;前桌的杨凌也有一番韵味,嗯,可以考虑;什么?老妈说新来的英语老师屁股很圆,可以生孩子……
  • 人生的秋季:王真波散文选

    人生的秋季:王真波散文选

    作者是伟人毛泽东故乡——湖南湘潭一位较有影响的实力派作家。他的散文气势雄奇,语言精炼,笔力遒劲,条理明畅,颇具特色。收入这部《人生的秋季——王真波散文选》的55篇散文,总计近14万字,反映了作家厚积薄发的创作状态。这是他直面现实又特别深刻的力作,证明他始终恪守着关注现实的文学主张……
  • 兽御天下:邪君小小妻

    兽御天下:邪君小小妻

    身怀异能女特工,意外葬身军工厂爆炸,是天灾还是人祸?大闹地府,强接转生任务,是称心如意,还是另有隐情?重活一世,且看季云璃如何逆天改命,与兽兽相亲相爱,与渣男渣女斗智斗勇。************过错,抑或是错过,三世转生,情缘是否能够依旧?
  • 曜日战记之为我独尊1

    曜日战记之为我独尊1

    在广阔无垠的曜灵大陆,人人都有灵力。当然,这灵力使人类显露出了原本贪婪的本性。而故事的主人公尚明羽就出生在这战乱纷争的灵力时代……
  • 我在日本的日常生活

    我在日本的日常生活

    剧情:在日本,我即将与日本的青少年进行一场血拼,泡日本妹子,打日本混混!我在日本的丰富日常生活,称霸名古屋!前言:在多次追求女孩失败之后,一个不知名的神“帮助”我穿越到了三年前的世界。但是,坑爹的是把我放到了日本
  • 车厘子

    车厘子

    让我来讲一个故事、这个故事里有你也有我。一个关于青春的写实,一场始于终极暴揍下美女救英雄的闹剧。凭借父辈善缘得以拜入风水大师门下,趋吉避凶、招财进宝、占卜测局…..勇往直前的少年、神秘莫测的风水、纯真的爱情,友情当然,阴险情敌、初恋女友、神秘方士、幕后黑手相继出现PS:本书没有重生穿越超能异术种马修仙更没有金手指,为你讲述主角一步步成长蜕变。