We have illustrated our meaning by an instance taken from history.We will select another from fiction.Othello murders his wife; he gives orders for the murder of his lieutenant; he ends by murdering himself.Yet he never loses the esteem and affection of Northern readers.His intrepid and ardent spirit redeems everything.The unsuspecting confidence with which he listens to his adviser, the agony with which he shrinks from the thought of shame, the tempest of passion with which he commits his crimes, and the haughty fearlessness with which he avows them, give an extraordinary interest to his character.Iago, on the contrary, is the object of universal loathing.Many are inclined to suspect that Shakspeare has been seduced into an exaggeration unusual with him, and has drawn a monster who has no archetype in human nature.Now we suspect that an Italian audience in the fifteenth century would have felt very differently.Othello would have inspired nothing but detestation and contempt.The folly with which he trusts the friendly professions of a man whose promotion he had obstructed, the credulity with which he takes unsupported assertions, and trivial circumstances, for unanswerable proofs, the violence with which he silences the exculpation till the exculpation can only aggravate his misery, would have excited the abhorrence and disgust of the spectators.The conduct of Iago they would assuredly have condemned; but they would have condemned it as we condemn that of his victim.Something of interest and respect would have mingled with their disapprobation.The readiness of the traitor's wit, the clearness of his judgment, the skill with which he penetrates the dispositions of others and conceals his own, would have ensured to him a certain portion of their esteem.
So wide was the difference between the Italians and their neighbours.A similar difference existed between the Greeks of the second century before Christ, and their masters the Romans.
The conquerors, brave and resolute, faithful to their engagements, and strongly influenced by religious feelings, were, at the same time, ignorant, arbitrary, and cruel.With the vanquished people were deposited all the art, the science, and the literature of the Western world.In poetry, in philosophy, in painting, in architecture, in sculpture, they had no rivals.
Their manners were polished, their perceptions acute, their invention ready; they were tolerant, affable, humane; but of courage and sincerity they were almost utterly destitute.Every rude centurion consoled himself for his intellectual inferiority, by remarking that knowledge and taste seemed only to make men atheists, cowards, and slaves.The distinction long continued to be strongly marked, and furnished an admirable subject for the fierce sarcasms of Juvenal.
The citizen of an Italian commonwealth was the Greek of the time of Juvenal and the Greek of the time of Pericles, joined in one.
Like the former, he was timid and pliable, artful and mean.But, like the latter, he had a country.Its independence and prosperity were dear to him.If his character were degraded by some base crimes, it was, on the other hand, ennobled by public spirit and by an honourable ambition,A vice sanctioned by the general opinion is merely a vice.The evil terminates in itself.A vice condemned by the general opinion produces a pernicious effect on the whole character.The former is a local malady, the latter a constitutional taint.When the reputation of the offender is lost, he too often flings the remains of his virtue after it in despair.The Highland gentleman who, a century ago, lived by taking blackmail from his neighbours, committed the same crime for which Wild was accompanied to Tyburn by the huzzas of two hundred thousand people.But there can be no doubt that he was a much less depraved man than Wild.The deed for which Mrs.Brownrigg was hanged sinks into nothing, when compared with theconduct of the Roman who treated the public to a hundred pair of gladiators.Yet we should greatly wrong such a Roman if we supposed that his disposition was as cruel as that of Mrs.
Brownrigg.In our own country, a woman forfeits her place in society by what, in a man, is too commonly considered as an honourable distinction, and, at worst, as a venial error.The consequence is notorious.The moral principle of a woman is frequently more impaired by a single lapse from virtue than that of a man by twenty years of intrigues.Classical antiquity would furnish us with instances stronger, if possible, than those to which we have referred.
