But it would be monstrous, says the persecutors, that Jews should legislate for a Christian community.This is a palpable misrepresentation.What is proposed is, not that the Jews should legislate for a Christian community, but that a legislature composed of Christians and Jews should legislate for a community composed of Christians and Jews.On nine hundred and ninety-nine questions out of a thousand, on all questions of police, of finance, of civil and criminal law, of foreign policy, the Jew, as a Jew, has no interest hostile to that of the Christian, or even to that of the Churchman.On questions relating to the ecclesiastical establishment, the Jew and the Churchman may differ.But they cannot differ more widely than the Catholic and the Churchman, or the Independent and the Churchman.The principle that Churchmen ought to monopolise the whole power of the State would at least have an intelligible meaning.The principle that Christians ought to monopolise it has no meaning at all.For no question connected with the ecclesiastical institutions of the country can possibly come before Parliament, with respect to which there will not be as wide a difference between Christians as there can be between any Christian and any Jew.
In fact the Jews are not now excluded from political power.They possess it; and as long as they are allowed to accumulate large fortunes, they must possess it.The distinction which is sometimes made between civil privileges and political power is a distinction without a difference.Privileges are power.Civil and political are synonymous words, the one derived from the Latin, the other from the Greek.Nor is this mere verbal quibbling.If we look for a moment at the facts of the case, we shall see that the things are inseparable, or rather identical.
That a Jew should be a judge in a Christian country would be most shocking.But he may be a juryman.He may try issues of fact; and no harm is done.But if he should be suffered to try issues of law, there is an end of the constitution.He may sit in a box plainly dressed, and return verdicts.But that he should sit on the bench in a black gown and white wig, and grant new trials, would be an abomination not to be thought of among baptized people.The distinction is certainly most philosophical.
What power in civilised society is so great as that of the creditor over the debtor? If we take this away from the Jew, we take away from him the security of his property.If we leave it to him, we leave to him a power more despotic by far than that of the King and all his Cabinet.
It would be impious to let a Jew sit in Parliament.But a Jew may make money; and money may make members of Parliament.Gatton and Old Sarum may be the property of a Hebrew.An elector of Penryn will take ten pounds from Shylock rather than nine pounds nineteen shillings and eleven-pence three farthings from Antonio.
To this no objection is made.That a Jew should possess the substance of legislative power, that he should command eight votes on every division as if he were the great Duke of Newcastle himself, is exactly as it should be.But that he should pass the bar and sit down on those mysterious, cushions of green leather, that he should cry "hear" and "order," and talk about being on his legs, and being, for one, free to say this and to say that, would be a profanation sufficient to bring ruin on the country.
That a Jew should be privy-councillor to a Christian king would be an eternal disgrace to the nation.But the Jew may govern the money-market, and the money-market may govern the world.The Minister may be in doubt as to his scheme of finance till he has been closeted with the Jew.A congress of sovereigns may be forced to summon the Jew to their assistance.The scrawl of the Jew on the back of a piece of paper may be worth more than the royal word of three kings, or the national faith of three new American republics.But that he should put Right Honourable before his name would be the most frightful of national calamities.
It was in this way that some of our politicians reasoned about the Irish Catholics.The Catholics ought to have no political power.The sun of England is set for ever if the Catholics exercise political power.Give the Catholics everything else; but keep political power from them.These wise men did not see that, when everything else had been given, political power had been given.They continued to repeat their cuckoo song, when it was no longer a question whether Catholics should have political power or not, when a Catholic association bearded the Parliament, when a Catholic agitator exercised infinitely more authority than the Lord Lieutenant.
If it is our duty as Christians to exclude the Jews from political power, it must be our duty to treat them as our ancestors treated them, to murder them, and banish them, and rob them.For in that way, and in that way alone, can we really deprive them of political power.If we do not adopt this course, we may take away the shadow, but we must leave them the substance.We may do enough to pain and irritate them; but we shall not do enough to secure ourselves from danger, if danger really exists.Where wealth is, there power must inevitably be.
The English Jews, we are told, are not Englishmen.They are a separate people, living locally in this island, but living morally and politically in communion with their brethren who are scattered over all the world.An English Jew looks on a Dutch or a Portuguese Jew as his countryman, and on an English Christian as a stranger.This want of patriotic feeling, it is said, renders a Jew unfit to exercise political functions.
