Like them, it has something, of invention, grandeur, and brilliancy.But, like them, it is grotesque and extravagant, and perpetually violates even that conventional probability which is essential to the effect of works of art.
The warmest admirers of Mr.Southey will scarcely, we think, deny that his success has almost always borne an inverse proportion to the degree in which his undertakings have required a logical head.His poems, taken in the mass, stand far higher than his prose works.His official Odes indeed, among which the Vision of Judgement must be classed, are, for the most part, worse than Pye's and as bad as Cibber's; nor do we think him generally happy in short pieces.But his longer poems, though full of faults, are nevertheless very extraordinary productions.We doubt greatly whether they will be read fifty years hence; but that, if they are read, they will be admired, we have no doubt whatever.
But, though in general we prefer Mr.Southey's poetry to his prose, we must make one exception.The Life of Nelson is, beyond all doubt, the most perfect and the most delightful of his works.
The fact is, as his poems most abundantly prove, that he is by no means so skilful in designing as in filling up.It was therefore an advantage to him to be furnished with an outline of characters and events, and to have no other task to perform than that of touching the cold sketch into life.No writer, perhaps, ever lived, whose talents so precisely qualified him to write the history of the great naval warrior.There were no fine riddles of the human heart to read, no theories to propound, no hidden causes to develop, no remote consequences to predict.The character of the hero lay on the surface.The exploits were brilliant and picturesque.The necessity of adhering to the real course of events saved Mr, Southey from those faults which deform the original plan of almost every one of his poems, and which even his innumerable beauties of detail scarcely redeem.The subject did not require the exercise of those reasoning powers the want of which is the blemish of his prose.It would not be easy to find, in all literary history, an instance of a more exact hit between wind and water.John Wesley and the Peninsular War were subjects of a very different kind, subjects which required all the qualities of a philosophic historian.In Mr.
Southey's works on these subjects, he has, on the whole, failed.
Yet there are charming specimens of the art of narration in both of them.The Life of Wesley will probably live.Defective as it is, it contains the only popular account of a most remarkable moral revolution, and of a man whose eloquence and logical acuteness might have made him eminent in literature, whose genius for government was not inferior to that of Richelieu, and who, whatever his errors may have been, devoted all his powers, in defiance of obloquy and derision, to what he sincerely considered as the highest good of his species.The History of the Peninsular War is already dead; indeed, the second volume was dead-born.The glory of producing an imperishable record of that great conflict seems to be reserved for Colonel Napier.
The Book of the Church contains some stories very prettily told.
The rest is mere rubbish.The adventure was manifestly one which could be achieved only by a profound thinker, and one in which even a profound thinker might have failed, unless his passions had been kept under strict control.But in all those works in which Mr.Southey has completely abandoned narration, and has undertaken to argue moral and political questions, his failure has been complete and ignominious.On such occasions his writings are rescued from utter contempt and derision solely by the beauty and purity of the English.We find, we confess, so great a charm in Mr.Southey's style, that, even when be writes nonsense, we generally read it with pleasure except indeed when he tries to be droll.A more insufferable jester never existed.He very often attempts to be humorous, and yet we do not remember a single occasion on which he has succeeded further than to be quaintly and flippantly dull.In one of his works he tells us that Bishop Sprat was very properly so called, inasmuch as he was a very small poet.And in the book now before us he cannot quote Francis Bugg, the renegade Quaker, without a remark on his unsavoury name.A wise man might talk folly like this by his own fireside;but that any human being, after having made such a joke, should write it down, and copy it out, and transmit it to the printer, and correct the proof-sheets, and send it forth into the world, is enough to make us ashamed of our species.
The extraordinary bitterness of spirit which Mr.Southey manifests towards his opponents is, no doubt, in a great measure to be attributed to the manner in which he forms his opinions.
Differences of taste, it has often been remarked, produce greater exasperation than differences on points of science.But this is not all.A peculiar austerity marks almost all Mr.Southey's judgments of men and actions.We are far from blaming him for fixing on a high standard of morals, and for applying that standard to every case.But rigour ought to be accompanied by discernment; and of discernment Mr.Southey seems to be utterly destitute.His mode of judging is monkish.It is exactly what we should expect from a stern old Benedictine, who had been preserved from many ordinary frailties by the restraints of his situation.No man out of a cloister ever wrote about love, for example, so coldly and at the same time me so grossly.His descriptions of it are just what we should hear from a recluse who knew the passion only from the details of the confessional.
