The manner in which Lord Mahon explains the financial situation of Spain by no means satisfies us."It will be found," says he, "that those individuals deriving their chief income from mines, whose yearly produce is uncertain and varying, and seems rather to spring from fortune than to follow industry, are usually careless, unthrifty, and irregular in their expenditure.The example of Spain might tempt us to apply the same remark to states." Lord Mahon would find it difficult, we suspect, to make out his analogy.Nothing could be more uncertain and varying than the gains and losses of those who were in the habit of putting into the State lotteries.But no part of the public income was more certain than that which was derived from the lotteries.We believe that this case is very similar to that of the American mines.Some veins of ore exceeded expectation; some fell below it.Some of the private speculators drew blanks, and others gained prizes.But the revenue of the State depended, not on any particular vein, but on the whole annual produce of two great continents.This annual produce seems to have been almost constantly on the increase during the seventeenth century.The Mexican mines were, through the reigns of Philip the Fourth and Charles the Second, in a steady course of improvement; and in South America, though the district of Potosi was not so productive as formerly, other places more than made up for the deficiency.We very much doubt whether Lord Mahon can prove that the income which the Spanish Government derived from the mines of America fluctuated more than the income derived from the internal taxes of Spain itself.
All the causes of the decay of Spain resolve themselves into one cause, bad government.The valour, the intelligence, the energy which, at the close of the fifteenth and the beginning of the sixteenth century, had made the Spaniards the first nation in the world, were the fruits of the old institutions of Castile and Arragon, institutions eminently favourable to public liberty.
These institutions the first Princes of the House of Austria attacked and almost wholly destroyed.Their successors expiated the crime.The effects of a change from good government to bad government are not fully felt for some time after the change has taken place.The talents and the virtues which a good constitution generates may for a time survive that constitution.
Thus the reigns of princes, who have established absolute monarchy on the ruins of popular forms of government often shine in history with a peculiar brilliancy.But when a generation or two has passed away, then comes signally to pass that which was written by Montesquieu, that despotic governments resemble those savages who cut down the tree in order to get at the fruit.
During the first years of tyranny, is reaped the harvest sown during the last years of liberty.Thus the Augustan age was rich in great minds formed in the generation of Cicero and Caesar.The fruits of the policy of Augustus were reserved for posterity.
Philip the Second was the heir of the Cortes and of the Justiza Mayor; and they left him a nation which seemed able to conquer all the world.What Philip left to his successors is well known.
The shock which the great religious schism of the sixteenth century gave to Europe, was scarcely felt in Spain.In England, Germany, Holland, France, Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden, that shock had produced, with some temporary evil, much durable good.
The principles of the Reformation had triumphed in some of those countries.The Catholic Church had maintained its ascendency in others.But though the event had not been the same in all, all had been agitated by the conflict.Even in France, in Southern Germany, and in the Catholic cantons of Switzerland, the public mind had been stirred to its inmost depths.The hold of ancient prejudice had been somewhat loosened.The Church of Rome, warned by the danger which she had narrowly escaped, had, in those parts of her dominion, assumed a milder and more liberal character.She sometimes condescended to submit her high pretensions to the scrutiny of reason, and availed herself more sparingly than in former times of the aid of the secular arm.Even when persecution was employed, it was not persecution in the worst and most frightful shape.The severities of Lewis the Fourteenth, odious as they were, cannot be compared with those which, at the first dawn of the Reformation, had been inflicted on the heretics in many parts of Europe.
The only effect which the Reformation had produced in Spain had been to make the Inquisition more vigilant and the commonalty more bigoted.The times of refreshing came to all neighbouring countries.One people alone remained, like the fleece of the Hebrew warrior, dry in the midst of that benignant and fertilising dew.While other nations were putting away childish things, the Spaniard still thought as a child and understood as a child.Among the men of the seventeenth century, he was the man of the fifteenth century or of a still darker period, delighted to behold an Auto da fe, and ready to volunteer on a Crusade.
