登陆注册
15709400000259

第259章

The principle is, that either at the beginning, or ultimately, such questions shall or may be decided by the national tribunals. If in any suit properly cognizable in a State court the decision should turn on a clause in the Constitution, or on a law of the United States, or on the act of a national offense, or on the validity of a national act, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court of the United States and to its officers. The object has been to give to the national tribunals of the nation full cognizance of its own laws, treaties, and congressional acts.

The judges of all the national tribunals, of whatever grade or rank, hold their offices for life, and are removable only on impeachment.

They are not even removable on an address of Congress; thus holding on a firmer tenure even than our own judges, who may, I believe, be moved on an address by Parliament. The judges in America are not entitled to any pension or retiring allowances; and as there is not, as regards the judges of the national courts, any proviso that they shall cease to sit after a certain age, they are in fact immovable whatever may be their infirmities. Their position in this respect is not good, seeing that their salaries will hardly admit of their making adequate provision for the evening of life. The salary of the Chief Justice of the United States is only 1300l. per annum.

All judges of the national courts, of whatever rank, are appointed by the President, but their appointments must be confirmed by the Senate. This proviso, however, gives to the Senate practically but little power, and is rarely used in opposition to the will of the President. If the President name one candidate, who on political grounds is distasteful to a majority of the Senate, it is not probable that a second nomination made by him will be more satisfactory. This seems now to be understood, and the nomination of the cabinet ministers and of the judges, as made by the President, are seldom set aside or interfered with by the Senate, unless on grounds of purely personal objection.

The position of the national judges as to their appointments and mode of tenure is very different from that of the State judges, to whom in a few lines I shall more specially allude. This should, Ithink, be specially noticed by Englishmen when criticising the doings of the American courts. I have observed statements made to the effect that decisions given by American judges as to international or maritime affairs affecting English interests could not be trusted, because the judges so giving them would have been elected by popular vote, and would be dependent on the popular voice for reappointment. This is not so. Judges are appointed by popular vote in very many of the States. But all matters affecting shipping and all questions touching foreigners are tried in the national courts before judges who have been appointed for life. I should not myself have had any fear with reference to the ultimate decision in the affair of Slidell and Mason had the "Trent" been carried into New York. I would, however, by no means say so much had the cause been one for trial before the tribunals of the State of New York.

I have been told that we in England have occasionally fallen into the error of attributing to the Supreme Court at Washington a quasi political power which it does not possess. This court can give no opinion to any department of the government, nor can it decide upon or influence any subject that has not come before it as a regularly litigated case in law. Though especially founded by the Constitution, it has no peculiar power under the Constitution, and stands in no peculiar relation either to that or to acts of Congress. It has no other power to decide on the constitutional legality of an act of Congress or an act of a State legislature, or of a public officer, than every court, State and National, high and low, possesses and is bound to exercise. It is simply the national court of last appeal.

In the different States such tribunals have been established as each State by its constitution and legislation has seen fit to adopt.

同类推荐
  • Histories

    Histories

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 阳宅指南

    阳宅指南

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 和东观群贤七夕临泛

    和东观群贤七夕临泛

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 海天诗话

    海天诗话

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 乐庵语录

    乐庵语录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 少林五形八法拳

    少林五形八法拳

    少林五形八法拳属北派少林拳系。它具有拳禅一体、内外合一、神形兼备之特点。本书着重介绍了少林五形八法拳的第二路,对其动作要求和技术要领作了详尽说明;此外,还对少林桩功、少林排打功作了介绍。全书文字通谷,方法易学易用,可供武术爱好者学习参考。
  • 倾天下之我欲成魔

    倾天下之我欲成魔

    应劫而生,却在错误的时间降世,本是九阳之体,却一出生身体便被封印了至阴至纯的始魔之气、暴虐的洪荒之力,性格放荡不羁,却偏偏为情所困,本是救世主却被逼得与苍生为敌,最终看尽人情冷暖斩三生化身为魔……
  • 杀剑戮仙

    杀剑戮仙

    我若成佛,天下无魔。我若成魔,佛耐我何?若天压我,劈开这天;若地拘我,踏碎这地;我等生来自由,谁敢高高在上。一个被世界所抛弃的人,为寻找宿命的真相走上一条跌宕起伏的逆天之路。在不断被命运戏弄后,从天堂跌落到地狱,再从地狱中爬起,创造出连神灵都为之惊叹的“奇迹”
  • 重生之杀手的冷艳老公

    重生之杀手的冷艳老公

    一觉醒来自己不在是自己,所有的过往都像是从来没有出现过,新的人生就此开始………看杀手也是有春天
  • 七剑十三侠

    七剑十三侠

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 邪王宠妻无上限:坑货王妃哪里逃

    邪王宠妻无上限:坑货王妃哪里逃

    一朝穿越,她不明身世,抱着不学无术不发愁,全靠三寸烂舌头的人生座右铭,坑蒙拐骗样样来。她见他,他痴呆如傻。却不料,这个纯天然呆货一夕之间变的腹黑狡诈,简直让她惊讶到不要不要的……“王爷,王妃又去行骗了……”“由着她!”“王爷,钟府被王妃闹得鸡犬不宁了……”“由着她!”“王爷,王妃,被邻国太子拐走了……”某人拍案而起,敢动他的人?爷分分钟秒了你。……“王妃为何这般爱财?”“因为要养王爷啊,王爷太贵养不起,伦家也是迫不得已……”
  • 天基

    天基

    意外天灾改变世界,种族政治宗教哲学战争生物...都发生了前所未有的变化。突如其来的战争,看少年如何拨开重重迷雾,踏上冒险之路,揭开世界真相...
  • 冷魅帝皇冷情妃:与卿常荣

    冷魅帝皇冷情妃:与卿常荣

    适逢盛世,他对她一见倾心,红鸾车辇迎她入宫,说是太后喜欢,可是不可否认他对她已萌生好奇。他以为,她终归逃不出他的手心,他许她“锦绣江山,与卿常荣”,这是多少女子梦寐以求的未来,她却淡然一笑。他为她脱下一身冷傲越陷越深,而她依旧冷淡,他始终入不了她的心。国家动荡,为了她的安危,他将她交到情敌手中。一朝平叛,再次相见,她却准备嫁为人妇。“林可依,你休想逃。”一介帝皇司马泽宇,冷傲天下,唯独痴心一人,奈何情敌太优秀,追妻之路很漫长。
  • 曼珠沙华之恋:恶魔校草很无赖

    曼珠沙华之恋:恶魔校草很无赖

    传说,有一种花是’开一千年,落一千年,花叶永不相见。情不为因果,缘注定生死‘,曼珠沙华赤是它的名字。守护彼岸花的是两个妖精,一个是花妖叫曼珠,一个是叶妖叫沙华。他们守侯了几千年的彼岸花,可是从来没有见过面,因为开花的时候,就没有叶子,有叶子的时候没有花。他们疯狂地想念着彼此,并被这种痛苦折磨着。终于有一天,他们决定违背神的规定偷偷地见一次面。神怪罪下来,这也是意料之中的。曼珠和沙华被打入轮回,并被诅咒永远也不能在一起,生生世世在人世间受到磨难。当曼珠的转世再次遇上沙华的转世,结局是否还是一样悲惨?【温馨提示:已弃坑,勿人坑】
  • 归虚灭世

    归虚灭世

    百年的轮回,失去的记忆,人世的残酷,一切的一切,到底会让这个肩负着特殊使命的少年做出什么举动?