登陆注册
15683300000041

第41章 CRITICISMS ON THE PRINCIPAL ITALIAN WRITERS(15)

"For his oppressions, let us look at the former history of this realm. James was never accounted a tyrant. Elizabeth is esteemed to have been the mother of her people. Were they less arbitrary? Did they never lay hands on the purses of their subjects but by Act of Parliament? Did they never confine insolent and disobedient men but in due course of law? Was the court of Star Chamber less active? Were the ears of libellers more safe? I pray you, let not king Charles be thus dealt with. It was enough that in his life he was tried for an alleged breach of laws which none ever heard named till they were discovered for his destruction. Let not his fame be treated as was his sacred and anointed body. Let not his memory be tried by principles found out ex post facto. Let us not judge by the spirit of one generation a man whose disposition had been formed by the temper and fashion of another.""Nay, but conceive me, Mr Cowley," said Mr Milton; "inasmuch as, at the beginning of his reign, he imitated those who had governed before him, I blame him not. To expect that kings will, of their own free choice, abridge their prerogative, were argument of but slender wisdom. Whatever, therefore, lawless, unjust, or cruel, he either did or permitted during the first years of his reign, I pass by. But for what was done after that he had solemnly given his consent to the Petition of Right, where shallwe find defence?Let it be supposed, which yet I concede not, that the tyranny of his father and of Queen Elizabeth had been no less rigorous than was his.But had his father, had that queen, sworn like him, to abstain from those rigours?Had they, like him, for good and valuable consideration, aliened their hurtful prerogatives?Surely not:from whatever excuse you can plead for him he had wholly excluded himself. The borders of countries, we know, are mostly the seats of perpetual wars and tumults.It was the same with the undefined frontiers, which of old separated privilege and prerogative.They were the debatable land of our polity.It was no marvel if, both on the one side and on the other, inroads were often made.But, when treaties have been concluded, spaces measured, lines drawn, landmarks set up, that which before might pass for innocent error or just reprisal becomes robbery, perjury, deadly sin.He knew not, you say, which of his powers were founded on ancient law, and which only on vicious example.But had he not read the Petition of Right? Had not proclamation been made from his throne, Soit fait comme il est desire?

"For his private virtues they are beside the question. Remember you not," and Mr Milton smiled, but somewhat sternly, "what Dr Cauis saith in the Merry Wives of Shakspeare? 'What shall the honest man do in my closet? There is no honest man that shall come in my closet.' Even so say I. There is no good man who shall make us his slaves. If he break his word to his people, is it a sufficient defence that he keeps it to his companions? If he oppress and extort all day, shall he be held blameless because he prayeth at night and morning? If he be insatiable in plunder and revenge, shall we pass it by because in meat and drink he is temperate? If he have lived like a tyrant, shall all be forgotten because he hath died like a martyr?

"He was a man, as I think, who had so much semblance of virtues as might make his vices most dangerous. He was not a tyrant after our wonted English model. The second Richard, the second and fourth Edwards, and the eighth Harry, were men profuse, gay, boisterous; lovers of women and of wine, of no outward sanctity or gravity. Charles was a ruler after the Italian fashion; grave, demure, of a solemn carriage, and asober diet; as constant at prayers as a priest, as heedless of oaths as an atheist."Mr Cowley answered somewhat sharply: "I am sorry, Sir, to hear you speak thus. I had hoped that the vehemence of spirit which was caused by these violent times had now abated. Yet, sure, Mr Milton, whatever you may think of the character of King Charles, you will not still justify his murder?""Sir," said Mr Milton, "I must have been of a hard and strange nature, if the vehemence which was imputed to me in my younger days had not been diminished by the afflictions wherewith it hath pleased Almighty God to chasten my age. I will not now defend all that I may heretofore have written. But this I say, that I perceive not wherefore a king should be exempted from all punishment. Is it just that where most is given least should be required? Or politic that where there is the greatest power to injure there should be no danger to restrain? But, you will say, there is no such law. Such a law there is. There is the law of selfpreservation written by God himself on our hearts. There is the primal compact and bond of society, not graven on stone, or sealed with wax, nor put down on parchment, nor set forth in any express form of words by men when of old they came together; but implied in the very act that they so came together, pre-supposed in all subsequent law, not to be repealed by any authority, nor invalidated by being omitted in any code; inasmuch as from thence are all codes and all authority.

"Neither do I well see wherefore you cavaliers, and, indeed, many of us whom you merrily call Roundheads, distinguish between those who fought against King Charles, and specially after the second commission given to Sir Thomas Fairfax, and those who condemned him to death. Sure, if his person were inviolable, it was as wicked to lift the sword against it at Naseby as the axe at Whitehall. If his life might justly be taken, why not in course of trial as well as by right of war?

"Thus much in general as touching the right. But, for the execution of King Charles in particular, I will not now undertake to defend it. Death is inflicted, not that the culprit may die, but that the state may be thereby advantaged.And, from all that I know, I think that the death ofKing Charles hath more hindered than advanced the liberties of England. "First, he left an heir.He was in captivity.The heir was in freedom.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 饭桶小王爷记

    饭桶小王爷记

    安南王范敬宣第三子范统自幼聪慧,却在八岁被人暗杀,侥幸不死变成痴呆。十六岁失足掉入自家后院荷花池后感染风寒后被从现在穿越来的范统代替。身为现代人的范统又会在古代翻起多少风浪?能否在古代醉卧美人膝呢?
  • 魔仙至尊道

    魔仙至尊道

    无根树,花正偏,离了阴阳道不全。顺为凡,逆为仙,只在中间颠倒颠。叶城为报家仇踏上茫茫修仙路,而真正踏上这条路之后才发现修仙一途并不是传说那般自由自在,反而充满了无情与孤独。阴谋与阳谋,明争和暗斗。这是一条极为危险之路,稍微不慎,便是万劫不复。……………………
  • 爱与被爱的幸福

    爱与被爱的幸福

    慕容中路和李晓彤是青梅竹马,因为接待新学弟学妹入学事件,迫使慕容中路光广播表白,可惜被李晓彤当成权宜之计。就当李晓彤终于对自己的感情有所察觉的时候,这段感情却因为父母以及对慕容中路角一往情深的学姐,而变得曲折。慕容中路爱的非常痛苦,被逼远走国外留学。学姐将计就计,提出牺牲自己做烟幕成全慕容中路和李晓彤,希望得到慕容中路的心。岂料,慕容中路和李晓彤感情深厚,让学姐无法如愿。学姐自杀威逼事件,慕容中路迫于压力,只能和学姐订婚以安抚学姐。两人随即分开,等待下一次的见面。
  • 无限诛神

    无限诛神

    如果有一天死神制作了一款无限流手机游戏,世界将会掀起怎样的浪花?一切尽在《无限诸神》!
  • 【粘上你!】我的优质殿下

    【粘上你!】我的优质殿下

    她不就是神经大条了点,嘴巴贪吃了点,模样可爱了点,但怎么可能会让7位王子对她说爱呢?还有还有,就算她’作恶多端’但那也不至于让老天一时怒起让她死掉吧?好吧,好吧,死掉就死掉,但老天又怎么可以虐待她,让她再次活过来,而且还忘记全部地站在依然深爱着她的殿下们的面前,傻乎乎地对他们说’对不起,我不认识你们.’可是怎么办呢?他们似乎不想让她过没心没肺的快乐生活哦,而是一个个像糖一样全部粘上了她!哦天!她的确是想找个帅得冒泡的王子来好好疼疼她,抱抱她,爱爱她,可缠上她的为什么非要是7个那!她她她她..快要郁闷得爆炸了!敬请关注【粘上你!】我的优质殿下
  • 超次元游戏灰色的纪元

    超次元游戏灰色的纪元

    女神の力を见せてあげる!不用我多解释,看这句话就应该知道我要写什么==
  • 穿越之天价宠妃

    穿越之天价宠妃

    她是商界精英,谁知竟然穿越成皇宫弃妃。外族之女遭人白眼,身上还背负着国仇家恨。娘的,这还有没有天理了?难道她的下半辈子就要在深宫大院里过上别人吃着她看着,别人睡着她站着,别人玩儿着她哭着的悲惨日子了?对于这样需要靠抱男人大腿过日子的生活,宓清瑶竖起中指,抱你麻痹,起来嗨!宓清瑶说“要赚钱,动起来,自己动手丰衣足食,皇帝?皇帝是个什么鬼?哪儿凉快哪儿呆着去!”
  • 琴魔无双传

    琴魔无双传

    秦无双白衣胜雪。持琴绝杀,笑傲天下。命运波折,杀伐果断。
  • 复仇“公举”驾到

    复仇“公举”驾到

    她的人生从好到坏,从坏到好,打渣男,踢渣女,梦里拥有着自己的白马王子,谁承想在现实中,白马王子木有,就只有一个黑马王子,冷淡是对别人,对她却特别的无赖,特别的霸道,他的话总让她忍俊不禁。。。。。。。。。。场景一:“你能绅士点吗?”某男自恋的说:“绅士?我本来就是!”场景二:“你干嘛?”某女一脸黑线的看着自己旁边的男人,“我在保护你,你旁边光“细菌”!”“额。。。”
  • 星际幻想:亡之亦王

    星际幻想:亡之亦王

    浩瀚星空,无垠宇宙。神:“殇不可逆,尔等唯有与吾站在一起,方有一线生机。”孟轲:“即不可逆,又有何惧。我们可和你不一样!”破茧而出,化而为殇。吾欲为王,亡之亦王。