Donne alone,but in such an ecstacy,and so altered as to his looks,as amazed Sir Robert to behold him;insomuch that he earnestly desired Mr.Donne to declare what had befallen him in the short time of his absence.To which Mr.Donne was not able to make a present answer:but,after a long and perplexed pause,did at last say,"I have seen a dreadful vision since I saw you:I have seen my dear wife pass twice by me through this room,with her hair hanging about her shoulders,and a dead child in her arms;this I have seen since I saw you."To which Sir Robert replied,"Sure,sir,you have slept since I saw you;and this is the result of some melancholy dream,which I desire you to forget,for you are now awake."To which Mr.Donne's reply was,"I cannot be surer that I now live than that I have not slept since I saw you:and I am as sure that at her second appearing she stopped,and looked me in the face,and vanished ."And upon examination,the abortion proved to be the same day,and about the very hour,that Mr.Donne affirmed he saw her pass by him in his chamber.
'And though it is most certain that two lutes,being both strung and tuned to an equal pitch,and then one played upon,the other,that is not touched,being laid upon a table at a fit distance,will (like an echo to a trumpet)warble a faint audible harmony in answer to the same tune;yet many will not believe there is any such thing as a sympathy of souls,and I am well pleased that every reader do enjoy his own opinion .'
He then appeals to authority,as of Brutus,St.Monica,Saul,St.Peter:-'More observations of this nature,and inferences from them,might be made to gain the relation a firmer belief;but Iforbear:lest I,that intended to be but a relator,may be thought to be an engaged person for the proving what was related to me,by one who had it from Dr.Donne.'
Walpole was no Boswell;worthy Boswell would have cross-examined Dr.Donne himself.
Of dreams he writes:
'Common dreams are but a senseless paraphrase on our waking thoughts,or of the business of the day past,or are the result of our over engaged affections when we betake ourselves to rest.'.Yet 'Almighty God (though the causes of dreams be often unknown)hath even in these latter times also,by a certain illumination of the soul in sleep,discovered many things that human wisdom could not foresee.'
Walton is often charged with superstition,and the enlightened editor of the eighteenth century excised all the scene of Mrs.
Donne's wraith as too absurd.But Walton is a very fair witness.Donne,a man of imagination,was,he tells us,in a perturbed anxiety about Mrs.Donne.The event was after dinner.The story is,by Walton's admission,at second hand.
Thus,in the language of the learned in such matters,the tale is 'not evidential.'Walton explains it,if true,as a result of 'sympathy of souls'--what is now called telepathy.But he is content that every man should have his own opinion.In the same way he writes of the seers in the Wotton family:'God did seem to speak to many of this family'(the Wottons)'in dreams,'and Thomas Wotton's dreams 'did usually prove true,both in foretelling things to come,and discovering things past.'Thus he dreamed that five townsmen and poor scholars were robbing the University chest at Oxford.He mentioned this in a letter to his son at Oxford,and the letter,arriving just after the robbery,led to the discovery of the culprits.Yet Walton states the causes and nature of dreams in general with perfect sobriety and clearness.His tales of this sort were much to Johnson's mind,as to Southey's.But Walton cannot fairly be called 'superstitious,'granting the age in which he lived.Visions like Dr.Donne's still excite curious comment.
