登陆注册
15486800000053

第53章 13

The 'now' is the link of time, as has been said (for it connects past and future time), and it is a limit of time (for it is the beginning of the one and the end of the other). But this is not obvious as it is with the point, which is fixed. It divides potentially, and in so far as it is dividing the 'now' is always different, but in so far as it connects it is always the same, as it is with mathematical lines. For the intellect it is not always one and the same point, since it is other and other when one divides the line; but in so far as it is one, it is the same in every respect.

So the 'now' also is in one way a potential dividing of time, in another the termination of both parts, and their unity. And the dividing and the uniting are the same thing and in the same reference, but in essence they are not the same.

So one kind of 'now' is described in this way: another is when the time is near this kind of 'now'. 'He will come now' because he will come to-day; 'he has come now' because he came to-day. But the things in the Iliad have not happened 'now', nor is the flood 'now'-not that the time from now to them is not continuous, but because they are not near.

'At some time' means a time determined in relation to the first of the two types of 'now', e.g. 'at some time' Troy was taken, and 'at some time' there will be a flood; for it must be determined with reference to the 'now'. There will thus be a determinate time from this 'now' to that, and there was such in reference to the past event.

But if there be no time which is not 'sometime', every time will be determined.

Will time then fail? Surely not, if motion always exists. Is time then always different or does the same time recur? Clearly time is, in the same way as motion is. For if one and the same motion sometimes recurs, it will be one and the same time, and if not, not.

Since the 'now' is an end and a beginning of time, not of the same time however, but the end of that which is past and the beginning of that which is to come, it follows that, as the circle has its convexity and its concavity, in a sense, in the same thing, so time is always at a beginning and at an end. And for this reason it seems to be always different; for the 'now' is not the beginning and the end of the same thing; if it were, it would be at the same time and in the same respect two opposites. And time will not fail; for it is always at a beginning.

'Presently' or 'just' refers to the part of future time which is near the indivisible present 'now' ('When do you walk? 'Presently', because the time in which he is going to do so is near), and to the part of past time which is not far from the 'now' ('When do you walk?'

'I have just been walking'). But to say that Troy has just been taken-we do not say that, because it is too far from the 'now'.

'Lately', too, refers to the part of past time which is near the present 'now'. 'When did you go?' 'Lately', if the time is near the existing now. 'Long ago' refers to the distant past.

'Suddenly' refers to what has departed from its former condition in a time imperceptible because of its smallness; but it is the nature of all change to alter things from their former condition. In time all things come into being and pass away; for which reason some called it the wisest of all things, but the Pythagorean Paron called it the most stupid, because in it we also forget; and his was the truer view.

It is clear then that it must be in itself, as we said before, the condition of destruction rather than of coming into being (for change, in itself, makes things depart from their former condition), and only incidentally of coming into being, and of being. A sufficient evidence of this is that nothing comes into being without itself moving somehow and acting, but a thing can be destroyed even if it does not move at all. And this is what, as a rule, we chiefly mean by a thing's being destroyed by time. Still, time does not work even this change; even this sort of change takes place incidentally in time.

We have stated, then, that time exists and what it is, and in how many senses we speak of the 'now', and what 'at some time', 'lately', 'presently' or 'just', 'long ago', and 'suddenly' mean.

同类推荐
  • 黄帝阴符经注

    黄帝阴符经注

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 离席

    离席

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • ON THE MAKALOA MAT ISLAND TALES

    ON THE MAKALOA MAT ISLAND TALES

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 两湖麈谈录

    两湖麈谈录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 易学滥觞

    易学滥觞

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 校园中的你我

    校园中的你我

    爱情是什么?很多人都不懂,作者对爱情又是如何理解?
  • 尸横遍野之求生之路

    尸横遍野之求生之路

    本是安静祥和的世界,丧尸的出现,顿时让整个世界崩塌。而我不是英雄,也没有拯救世界的正义感,我只想苟延残喘的活下去,带着我的朋友,逃离这片被感染的土地。
  • 锡纸上的心跳回忆

    锡纸上的心跳回忆

    献给心爱的心跳回忆,请允许我在传说之树下书写出属于我的心跳回忆
  • 呆仙笑传

    呆仙笑传

    一名爱吐槽的宅女,一次离奇的穿越,一个万族不分的混乱年代,一纸续写宿命的万年契约,一段热血而又孤独的修行之路.......连更天数的右侧有个加入书架,大家顺手点一下,那个就是所谓的收藏。
  • 强者之主

    强者之主

    佛道两家皆说:“众生平等。”就是说天下原本是没有邪恶之分,怎奈众生皆有七情六欲,因此,就出现了邪修。。。。。。
  • 一约四生痴

    一约四生痴

    命生便缥缈,情出便晦涩。昔日的约定,换来四生的追逐。那终究是南柯一梦还是黄粱美梦还请吾等耐心寻找(还请大家多多提议,这一定是一份不同寻常的爱,作者做不到纯纯的古风文笔,但会尽量给大家展示最美的剧情)
  • 愈稔愈陌

    愈稔愈陌

    一个优秀女孩遭变故,颓废而迷离,用一辈子,只换个真相。一个法学硕士迷失于金钱,丧失原则,良心被逐渐埋没。一个风光无限的影视花旦,堵上名誉辉煌,义无反顾。一个痴情的男孩,始终如一,用最后一口气,去爱。一个金融大鳄,崩溃徘徊,难过情关。复杂交错的青春,张扬的个性,不羁的放纵;城府,怀疑,利益,五人直至互相利用,彼此伤害,最后陌路再难逢
  • 逆天王妃:废柴也是天才

    逆天王妃:废柴也是天才

    不过是和师兄练习打拳,没想到师只—拳过来竟然给打穿越了。为啥别人穿越不是皇后就是自由身她咧?废柴一个…哼哼,人家废柴也可以成为天才的她是废柴都可以虐渣男渣女谁说废柴不能练灵幻力了?人家还可以炼丹药
  • EXO的血腥爱恋

    EXO的血腥爱恋

    她是一个双面女孩,即拥有天使般纯洁的心灵,又拥有恶魔的阴险,她是一个孤儿,四岁时被收养,成为鹿晗的妹妹,成为EXO可以放弃一切保护的女孩。如果你用异能伤害人类,我不介意和你一刀两断。--鹿晗治愈得了你的伤,却治愈不了你的心。--张艺兴伤害她的人,只有死!--边伯贤教会了我爱情,为什么不把心留下?--吴世勋如果狼族是你的羁绊,我会为你血洗狼族!--朴灿烈想哭吗?没关系,我陪你。--金珉硕我只想为你一个人做早餐,可以答应我吗?--都暻秀赢了世界又如何,你却不见了。-吴亦凡丫头,你要的承诺,我给。-金俊绵我不会再松开你的手。-金钟大
  • 无限帝者

    无限帝者

    什么叫系统故障?什么叫自动传送?什么叫无法退出?什么叫我是牧师?什么叫智力封印?什么叫多重人格?一个疯狂的计划,百万人的牺牲,只为成就帝者,是世界的疯狂,还是侵略的无奈.第一次玩立体网游的曾瓜与他的发小曾伟,外带一个不知与曾瓜有何不清不楚的关系的千金小姐林可梦进入了超梦世界。。。