登陆注册
15476900000009

第9章 "MATERIALISM"(4)

It is true that Feuerbach had lived to see all three of the decisive discoveries -- that of the cell, the transformation of energy, and the theory of evolution named after Darwin. But how could the lonely philosopher, living in rural solitude, be able sufficiently to follow scientific developments in order to appreciate at their full value discoveries which natural scientists themselves at that time either still contested or did not know how to make adequate use of? The blame for this falls solely upon the wretched conditions in Germany, in consequence of which cobweb-spinning eclectic flea-crackers had taken possession of the chairs of philosophy, while Feuerbach, who towered above them all, had to rusticate and grow sour in a little village.

It is therefore not Feuerbach's fault that this historical conception of nature, which had now become possible and which removed all the one-sidedness of French materialism, remained inaccessible to him.

Secondly, Feuerbach is quite correct in asserting that exclusively natural-scientific materialism is indeed "the foundation of the edifice of human knowledge, but not the edifice itself". For we live not only in nature but also in human society, and this also no less than nature has its history of development and its science. It was therefore a question of bringing the science of society, that is, the sum total of the so-called historical and philosophical sciences, into harmony with the materialist foundation, and of reconstructing it thereupon. But it did not fall to Feuerbach's lot to do this. In spite of the "foundation", he remained here bound by the traditional idealist fetters, a fact which he recognizes in these words: "Backwards I agree with the materialists, but not forwards!"

But it was Feuerbach himself who did not go "forwards" here; in the social domain, who did not get beyond his standpoint of 1840 or 1844.

And this was again chiefly due to this reclusion which compelled him, who, of all philosophers, was the most inclined to social intercourse, to produce thoughts out of his solitary head instead of in amicable and hostile encounters with other men of his calibre. Later, we shall see in detail how much he remained an idealist in this sphere.

It need only be added here that Starcke looks for Feuerbach's idealism in the wrong place.

"Feuerbach is an idealist; he believes in the progress of mankind." (p.19)

"The foundation, the substructure of the whole, remains nevertheless idealism. Realism for us is nothing more than a protection again aberrations, while we follow our ideal trends. Are not compassion, love, and enthusiasm for truth and justice ideal forces?" (p.VIII)

In the first place, idealism here means nothing, but the pursuit of ideal aims. But these necessarily have to do at the most with Kantian idealism and its "categorical imperative"; however, Kant himself called his philosophy "transcendental idealism" by no means because he dealt therein also with ethical ideals, but for quite other reasons, as Starcke will remember.

The superstitition that philosophical idealism is pivoted round a belief in ethical, that is, social, ideals, arose outside philosophy, among the German philistines, who learned by heart from Schiller's poems the few morsels of philosophical culture they needed. No one has criticized more severely the impotent "categorical imperative" of Kant -- impotent because it demands the impossible, and therefore never attains to any reality -- no one has more cruelly derided the philistine sentimental enthusiasm for unrealizable ideals purveyed by Schiller than precisely the complete idealist Hegel (see, for example, his Phenomenology ).

In the second place, we simply cannot get away from the fact that everything that sets men acting must find its way through their brains -- even eating and drinking, which begins as a consequence of the sensation of hunger or thirst transmitted through the brain, and ends as a result of the sensation of satisfaction likewise transmitted through the brain.

The influences of the external world upon man express themselves in his brain, are reflected therein as feelings, impulses, volitions -- in short, as "ideal tendencies", and in this form become "ideal powers". If, then, a man is to be deemed an idealist because he follows "ideal tendencies" and admits that "ideal powers" have an influence over him, then every person who is at all normally developed is a born idealist and how, in that case, can there still be any materialists?

In the third place, the conviction that humanity, at least at the present moment, moves on the whole in a progressive direction has absolutely nothing to do with the antagonism between materialism and idealism. The French materialists no less than the deists Voltaire and Rousseau held this conviction to an almost fanatical degree, and often enough made the greatest personal sacrifices for it. If ever anybody dedicated his whole life to the "enthusiasm for truth and justice" -- using this phrase in the good sense -- it was Diderot, for instance. If, therefore, Starcke declares all this to be idealism, this merely proves that the word materialism, and the whole antagonism between the two trends, has lost all meaning for him here.

The fact is that Starcke, although perhaps unconsciously, in this makes an unpardonable concession to the traditional philistine prejudice against the word materialism resulting from its long-continued defamation by the priests. By the word materialism, the philistine understands gluttony, drunkenness, lust of the eye, lust of the flesh, arrogance, cupidity, avarice, covetousness, profit-hunting, and stock-exchange swindling -- in short, all the filthy vices in which he himself indulges in private. By the word idealism he understands the belief in virtue, universal philanthropy, and in a general way a "better world", of which he boasts before others but in which he himself at the utmost believes only so long as he is having the blues or is going through the bankruptcy consequent upon his customary "materialist" excesses. It is then that he sings his favorite song, What is man? -- Half beast, half angel.

For the rest, Starcke takes great pains to defend Feuerbach against the attacks and doctrines of the vociferous assistant professors who today go by the name of philosophers in Germany. For people who are interested in this afterbirth of classical German philosophy this is, of course, a matter of importance; for Starcke himself it may have appeared necessary.

We, however, will spare the reader this.

同类推荐
  • 桧亭集

    桧亭集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 佛说诸法本无经

    佛说诸法本无经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 佛说栴檀香身陀罗尼经

    佛说栴檀香身陀罗尼经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 子不语

    子不语

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 启真集

    启真集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 傲剑邪尊

    傲剑邪尊

    天地谁主宰,世间有帝宫!少年步离迈入帝宫,蜕神体,修神决,踏平天下不服者!这一生不要问道永生,只求一世独尊!
  • 总裁来访:娇妻乖乖入怀

    总裁来访:娇妻乖乖入怀

    一夜醒来,她被人睡了,去上班还被腹黑总裁折磨。终于有一天她忍无可忍道“邱晓明,你丫的还想不想混了。”说完她就后悔了,因为某位腹黑总裁正在一步一步向她靠近,“你别过来,我是有武器的哦!”范芊儿手里拿着一个毛绒玩具。“女人,想保护自己也得挑个好一点的武器吧!”某腹黑总裁邪恶的看着她。
  • 魔神本心

    魔神本心

    何为正?正为遵从本心。何为魔?魔为随心所欲。若正如你们一样肮脏虚伪,那我便愿意沦为那魔!证那无上魔道。看坚毅少年如何走上魔神的道路。
  • 倾梦三世

    倾梦三世

    一部三世情缘,一部旷世奇恋诉说着命运不在自己手中的一群人去追求自己想要的爱情。当爱碰上了命运,随心还是放弃。当公主碰上王子,能披上婚纱吗?一直在寻找有你的世界,而你却一直在逃避。有你想要的英雄救美,有你想要的王子,更有你想要的英雄。激烈帅酷的打斗,让人缠绵纠结的爱情,让你虐泪的剧情。
  • 史诗:魔界众生

    史诗:魔界众生

    史诗:魔界众生相。看魔王风魔十三如何王者归来。
  • 麟儿报

    麟儿报

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 回档之人

    回档之人

    杨宙在昏睡中醒来,发现回到了十年前,正值大学开学。大学还是那个大学,舍友还是那些舍友,他拥有了未来之眼,清晰的知道身边亲朋好友的人生轨迹。每每想起前世的平凡人生,他就想在这一世做点不一样的事情。
  • 风雨话江湖

    风雨话江湖

    江湖,江湖。不在江里,也不在湖里,而在人间。在人与人之间。
  • 竹马豪宠之慕名而来

    竹马豪宠之慕名而来

    此乃宠文,宠的没天理没节操。两年前,某女:“我看上你了。”而两年后青梅竹马的他们再聚,成为公认的一对。”路易十四玫瑰的花语是什么?“”我只钟情你一个。“他得逞般地笑了:”我也是。“求婚那天,他问:“愿意嫁给我吗?”她莞尔一笑:“听说慕大少总宠妻入骨,我慕名而来!”从来没有爱和不爱,只有想和不想。想着过一辈子,就真的过了。他说:“老婆,路易十四玫瑰看腻了,我带你看最美的星空。”
  • 魔绝天下

    魔绝天下

    一段旷世之战,一段痴情绝恋,一段转世重修,一段尘封的记忆,是谁?让这位旷古烁今的人悄然落泪,转世之后又会是怎样的一副场景。。。。。