登陆注册
15470000000057

第57章

If we remove those strata of the law of villainage which owe their origin to the action of the feudal system and to the action of the State, which rises on the ruins of the feudal system, we come upon remnants of the pre-feudal condition. They are by no means few or unimportant, and it is rather a wonder that so much should be preserved notwithstanding the systematic work of conquest, feudalism, and State. When I speak of pre-feudal condition I do not mean to say, of course, that feudalism had not been in the course of formation before the Norman Conquest. Imerely wish to oppose a social order grounded on feudalism to a social order which was only preparing for it and developing on a different basis. The Conquest brought together the free and unfree. Our survivals of the state of things before the Conquest group themselves naturally in one direction, they are manifestations of the free element which went into the constitution of villainage. It is not strange that it should be so, because the servile element predominated in those parts of the law which had got the upper hand and the official recognition. A trait which goes further than the accepted law in the direction of slavery is the difficulties which are put by Glanville in the way of manumission. His statement practically amounts to a denial of the possibility of manumission, and such a denial we cannot accept. His way of treating the question may possibly be explained by old notions as to the inability of a master to put a slave by a mere act of his will on the same level with free men.

However this may be, our survivals arrange themselves with this single possible exception in the direction of freedom.

Perhaps such facts as the villain's capacity to take legal action against third persons, and his position in the criminal and police law, ought not to be called survivals. They are certain sides of the subject. They are indissolubly allied to such features of the civil law as the occasional recognition of villainage as a protected tenure, and the villain's admitted standing against the lord when the lord had bound himself by covenant. In the light of these facts villainage assumes an entirely different aspect from that which legal theory tries to give it. Procedural disability comes to the fore instead of personal debasement. A villain is to a great extent in the power of his lord, not because he is his chattel, but because the courts refuse him an action against the lord. He may have rights recognised by morality and by custom, but he has no means to enforce them; and he has no means to enforce them because feudalism disables the State and prevents it from interfering.

The political root of the whole growth becomes apparent, and it is quite clear, on the one hand, that liberation will depend to a great extent on the strengthening of the State; and, on the other hand, that one must look for the origins of enslavement to the political conditions before and after the Conquest.

One undoubtedly encounters difficulties in tracing and grouping facts with regard to those elements of freedom which appear in the law of villainage. Sometimes it may not be easy to ascertain whether a particular trait must be connected with legal progress making towards modern times, or with the remnants of archaic institutions. As a matter of fact, however, it will be found that, save in very few cases, we possess indications to show us which way we ought to look.

Another difficulty arises from the fact that the law of this period was fashioned by kings of French origin and lawyers of Norman training. What share is to be assigned to their formal influence? and what share comes from that old stock of ideas and facts which they could not or would not destroy? We may hesitate as to details in this respect. It is possible that the famous paragraph of the so-called Laws of William the Conqueror, prescribing in general terms that peasants ought not to be taken from the land or subjected to exactions,(3*) is an insertion of the Norman period, although the great majority of these Laws are Saxon gleanings. It is likely that the notion of wainage was worked out under the influence of Norman ideas; the name seems to show it, and perhaps yet more the fact that the plough was specially privileged in the duchy. It is to be assumed that the king, not because he was a Norman but because he was a king, was interested in the welfare of subjects on whose back the whole structure of his realm was resting. But the influence of the strangers went broadly against the peasantry, and it has been repeatedly shown that Norman lawyers were prompted by anything but a mild spirit towards them. The Dialogus de Scaccario is very instructive on this point, because it was written by a royal officer who was likely to be more impartial than the feudatories or any one who wrote in their interest would be, and yet it makes out that villains are mere chattels of their lord, and treats them throughout with the greatest contempt. And so, speaking generally, it is to the times before the Conquest that the stock of liberty and legal independence inherent in villainage must be traced, even if we draw inferences merely on the strength of the material found on this side of the Conquest. And when we come to Saxon evidence, we shall see how intimately the condition of the ceorl connects itself with the state of the villain along the main lines and in detail.

The case of ancient demesne is especially interesting in this light. It presents, as it were, an earlier and less perfect crystallisation of society on a feudal basis than the manorial system of Common Law. It steps in between the Saxon soc and tun on the one hand, and the manor on the other. It owes to the king's privilege its existence as an exception. The procedure of its court is organised entirely on the old pattern and quite out of keeping with feudal ideas, as will be shown by-and-by.

同类推荐
  • 船山思问录

    船山思问录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 百川书志

    百川书志

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 弦索西厢

    弦索西厢

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • Much Ado About Nothing

    Much Ado About Nothing

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 四分律藏

    四分律藏

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 野犬女皇

    野犬女皇

    沈石溪通过自己的作品,不仅把奇丽美妙的大自然和动物世界中鲜为人知的奥秘,艺术地展现给读者,而且还能深刻地剖析动物形象内心活动的心理历程,生动地表现了动物世界别具一格的生命规律、生存竞争、有序的动物习性,以及艺术形象鲜明独特的个性。
  • 还记得昨天,那个夏天

    还记得昨天,那个夏天

    生命里最好的岁月,就是青春。青春的懵懂和青涩,让所有爱都一生难忘,可能只有那时的夏季才是热烈并充满生机的。他叫青阳。万丈光芒。
  • 独家暗恋:竹马男神很腹黑

    独家暗恋:竹马男神很腹黑

    林浅以为这辈子都不会再见到隔壁家的大哥哥,随着时间的推移当年青春年少的懵懂的暗恋,却没有消失,却没想到是在这种情况下见面的,何以笙没想到能再次见到以前隔壁家的小妹妹,当年的小妹妹已经出落的亭亭玉立了,相亲走错地,还认错人,林浅无奈,偏偏还是以前的竹马大哥哥于是软萌的说”对不起,我走错了“某竹马”以后只能和我相亲,“林浅惊恐到“我不要,你太老了”某竹马”让你试试看看我老不老“从此林浅过上夜夜笙歌的生活,某日,某宝偷笑到"后妈,脖子上怎么全是红印?“林浅咬牙切齿喊道“何以笙,”(又名时光荏苒之浅笙微光)
  • 圣斗士星矢星之神话

    圣斗士星矢星之神话

    这是发生于很久以前的某个年代,雅典娜与哈迪斯之间的圣战的故事。
  • 8090:灰姑娘和她的王子们

    8090:灰姑娘和她的王子们

    新建Q群:108177334加入时请注明身份,谢谢合作!林梦影从小在孤儿院长大,孤儿院里有她最好的朋友,也有她最喜欢的老师,可是一次意外,却让她们有了各自的生活轨迹。梦影被农场里一个纯朴的夫妇收养,而她最好的朋友却成了堂堂大唐财团的千金,两个截然不同的生命,在彼此的生命中,擦出了关于友情、爱情、亲情的火花。8090:灰姑娘的白马王子,送给每一个8090的亲们!O(∩_∩)O~
  • 算命不求人

    算命不求人

    一般人对于命运总是好奇的,每年总是问过好多先生,同时也花了不少钱。一有困难,就要找先生,同时还要打破沙锅问到底。鉴于此,我们通过借鉴古书的精华,融各家之长,采用各种奇书以及近代科学方法汇编了《古代文化集粹》丛书,本丛书应用方便,通俗易懂,意在为你的命运指点迷津,让你轻松驾驭自己的人生。
  • 世子爷的麻辣小厨娘

    世子爷的麻辣小厨娘

    不就是用一碗粥救了他一命吗?她真的不要他以身相许的答谢!可这个不可一世的世子爷耳朵有问题,不但不听劝,反而变本加厉。第一次世子爷的求亲是这样的:“小厨娘,看你救了本世子一命,本世子就勉为其难地娶你当小妾吧。”月良辰非常嫌弃地看着小辣椒一身粗布麻衣的打扮,眼睛长在头顶上,高傲无比道。“小妾?”小辣椒直接拔出插在腰间的菜刀,一刀劈过去!(本文纯属虚构,请勿模仿。)
  • 送从弟谒员外叔父回

    送从弟谒员外叔父回

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 最佳强娶:总裁追妻令

    最佳强娶:总裁追妻令

    许念,二十岁那年,被家人抛弃,拒之门外,她在门外哭喊,最后晕倒在了暴雨之中。再次醒来是在陌生人男人的家里,这个男人收留她,给她工作,待她温柔。许念一心认为他是个好人,对他无话不说,然而就是这个好人,给了她一生都难以忘记的痛苦回忆。深夜,他压她在身下,用好听用性感的嗓音宣誓主权。他说:“你是我的,并且只能是我的。”许念泪水沾湿了枕头,她哭着求他别这样,然而,一切都是徒劳。他霸占她,囚困她,剥夺了她的自由。她不甘心,一直想办法逃走。一次失败,第二次成功。就在他们的结婚典礼上,那一刻,她真正明白什么表情叫做面如死灰……
  • 问寻三千道

    问寻三千道

    用我几世轮回,寻求一世巅峰。宇宙漫漫,何为至尊。大道三千,何为巅峰。当发现自己错了几生几世,又该寻求怎样的大道?当红新晋演艺小生秦寰为护住节操反抗潜规则,惨遭车祸,然而再次睁眼后...“秦少爷?”...少了一魂一魄的人还能活多久,急,在线等...