and means a court held freely by the lord and not a court of free men. Mr Maitland adds， that he has found mention of a court of villains and one of knights， but that he never came across a court of barons in the sense given in later jurisprudence to the term 'Court Baron.' Here I must put in a trifling qualification which does not affect his main position in the least. The Introduction to the Selden Society's second volume， which is our greatest authority on this subject， mentions a case when the halimot was actually divided on the principle laid down by Coke and later lawyers generally. I mean the case of Steyning， where the Abbot holds a separate court for free tenants and another for his villains. The instance belongs to the time of the Edwards， but it is marked as an innovation and a bad one.(29*) It shows， however， that the separation of the courts was beginning to set in. The Steyning case is not quite an isolated one. I have found in the Hundred Rolls the expression Sockemanemot to designate a court attended by free sokemen，(30*) and it may be suggested that the formation of the so-called Court Baron may have been facilitated by the peculiar constitution and customs of those courts where the unfree element was almost entirely absent. The Danish shires and Kent could not but exercise a certain influence on the adjoining counties. However this might be， the general rule is， undoubtedly， that no division is admitted， and that all the suitors and affairs are concentrated in the one manorial court -- the halimot.
It met generally once every three weeks， but it happens sometimes that it is called together without a definite limit of time at the pleasure of the lord.(31*) Cases like that of the manors of the Abbey of Ramsey， in which the courts are summoned only twice a year， are quite exceptional， and in the instance cited the fact has to be explained by the existence of an upper court for these estates， the court of the honour of Broughton.(32*) The common suitors are the peasants living within the manor -- the owners of holdings in the fields of the manor.
In important trials， when free men are concerned， or when a thief has to be hanged， suitors are called in from abroad -- mostly small free tenants who have entered into an agreement about a certain number of suits to the court.(33*) These foreign suitors appear once every six weeks， twice a year， for special trials upon a royal writ， for the hanging of thieves，(34*) etc. The duty of attending the court is constantly mentioned in the documents.
It involved undoubtedly great hardships， expense， and loss of time： no wonder that people tried to exempt themselves from it as much as possible.(35*) Charters relating to land provide for all manner of cases relating to suit of court. We find it said， for instance， that a tenant must make his appearance on the next day after getting his summons， even if it was brought to him at midnight.(36*) When a holding was divided into several parts， the most common thing was that one suit remained due from the whole.(37*) All these details are by no means without importance， because they show that fiscal reasons had as much to do with the arrangement of these meetings as real interests： every court gave rise to a number of fines from suitors who had made default.
The procedure of the halimot was ruled by ancient custom. All foreign elements in the shape of advocates or professional pleaders were excluded. Such people， we are told by the manorial instructions， breed litigation and dead-letter formalism， whereas trials ought to be conducted and judged according to their substance.(38*) Another ceremonial peculiarity of some interest concerns the place where manorial courts are held. It is certain that the ancient gem髏s were held in the open air， as Mr Gomme shows in his book on early folk-mots. And we see a survival of the custom in the meeting which used to be held by the socmen of Stoneleigh on Motstowehill.(39*) But in the feudal period the right place to hold the court was the manorial hall. We find indeed that the four walls of this room are considered as the formal limit of the court， so that a man who has stept within them and has then gone off without sufficient reason is charged with contempt of court.(40*) Indeed， the very name of 'halimot'
can hardly be explained otherwise than as the moot held in the hall.(41*) The point is of some interest， because the hall is not regarded as a purely material contrivance for keeping people protected against the cold and the rain， but appears in close connexion with the manor， and as its centre and symbol.
We hear very little of husbandry arrangements made by the courts，(42*) and even of the repartition of duties and taxes.(43*) Entries relating to the election of officers are more frequent，(44*) but the largest part of the rolls is taken up by legal business of all sorts.
The entire court， and sometimes a body of twelve jurors， present those who are guilty of any offence or misdemeanour.
