登陆注册
15464300000044

第44章 THE GREAT POLITICAL SUPERSTITION(5)

Turn now to the converse question -- For what ends would all men agree to co-operate? None will deny that for resisting invasion the agreement would be practically unanimous. Excepting only the Quakers, who, having done highly useful work in their time, are now dying out, all would unite for defensive war (not, however, for offensive war); and they would, by so doing, tacitly bind themselves to conform to the will of the majority in respect of measures directed to that end. There would be practical unanimity, also, in the agreement to co-operate for defence against internal enemies as against eternal enemies. Omitting criminals, all must wish to have person and property adequately protected. In short, each citizen desires to preserve his life, to preserve those things which conduce to maintenance of his life and enjoyment of it, and to preserve intact his liberties both of using these things and getting further such. It is obvious to him that he cannot do all this if he acts alone. Against foreign invaders he is powerless unless he combines with his fellows; and the business of protecting himself against domestic invaders, if he did not similarly combine, would be alike onerous, dangerous, and inefficient. In one other co-operation all are interested --use of the territory they inhabit. Did the primitive communal ownership survive, there would survive the primitive communal control of the uses to be made of land by individuals or by groups of them; and decisions of the majority would rightly prevail respecting the terms on which portions of it might be employed for raising food, for making means of communication, and for other purposes. Even at present, though the matter has been complicated by the growth of private landownership, yet, since the State is still supreme owner (every landowner being in law a tenant of the Crown) able to resume possession, or authorize compulsory purchase, at a fair price; the implication is that the will of the majority is valid respecting the modes in which, and conditions under which, parts of the surface or sub-surface, may be utilized: involving certain agreements made on behalf of the public with private persons and companies.

Details are not needful here; nor is it needful to discuss that border region lying between these classes of cases, and to say how much is included in the last and how much is excluded with the first. For present purposes, it is sufficient to recognize the undeniable truth that there are numerous kinds of actions in respect of which men would not, if they were asked, agree with anything like unanimity to be bound by the will of the majority; while there are some kinds of actions in respect of which they would almost unanimously agree to be thus bound. Here, then, we find a definite warrant for enforcing the will of the majority within certain limits, and a definite warrant for denying the authority of its will beyond those limits.

But evidently, when analysed, the question resolves itself into the further question -- What are the relative claims of the aggregate and of its units? Are the rights of the community universally valid against the individual? or has the individual some rights which are valid against the community? The judgment given on this point underlies the entire fabric of political convictions formed, and more especially those convictions which concern the proper sphere of government. Here, then, I propose to revive a dormant controversy, with the expectation of reaching a different conclusion from that which is fashionable.

Says Professor Jevons, in his work, The State in Relation to Labour "The first step must be to rid our minds of the idea that there are any such things in social matters as abstract rights."Of like character is the belief expressed by Mr Matthew Arnold, in his article on copyright: -- "An author has no natural right to a property in his production. But then neither has he a natural right to anything whatever which he may produce or acquire."(5*) So, too, I recently read in a weekly journal of high repute, that "to explain once more that there is no such thing as 'natural right' would be a waste of philosophy." And the view expressed in these extracts is commonly uttered by statesmen and lawyers in a way implying that only the unthinking masses hold any other.

One might have expected that utterances to this effect would have been rendered less dogmatic by the knowledge that a whole school of legalists on the Continent, maintains a belief diametrically opposed to that maintained by the English school.

The idea of Natur-recht is the root-idea of German jurisprudence.

Now whatever may be the opinion held respecting German philosophy at large, it cannot be characterized as shallow. A doctrine current among a people distinguished above all others as laborious inquirers, and certainly not to be classed with superficial thinkers, should not be dismissed as though it were nothing more than a popular delusion. This, however, by the way.

Along with the proposition denied in the above quotations, there goes a counter-proposition affirmed. Let us see what it is; and what results when we go behind it and seek its warrant.

同类推荐
  • The Brown Fairy Book

    The Brown Fairy Book

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 全闽诗话

    全闽诗话

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 解人颐

    解人颐

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 重庆堂随笔

    重庆堂随笔

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 云杜故事

    云杜故事

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 唐太宗李世民(世界伟人传记丛书)

    唐太宗李世民(世界伟人传记丛书)

    唐太宗李世民是中国古代最杰出的帝王之一。他年轻始就与父、兄、弟等人登上隋末群雄逐鹿中原的乱战的舞台上,推翻了隋末的残暴政权,建立李唐王朝,又以无比的气魄与军事才能,统率部曲,平定国内多次割据势力,使得李唐政权实现了真正的统一。于武德九年,他发动“玄武门之变”,诛杀兄长建成及弟弟元吉,继而夺取得皇太子的地位,同年,李渊让位,李世民正式登基称帝,年号“贞观”。
  • 月上西楼之我的奋斗

    月上西楼之我的奋斗

    这是一个都市和历史碰撞的传奇。这里有玄幻的王朝争霸,仙侠的权利与阴谋。这里有远古的刀耕火种,眼前的无奈与嚣张。这里有泰国的降头、苗疆蛊事和黑暗议会,聚集了所有暗夜的精灵,他们也有爱和恨的哀伤。这里有都市行医的理智与背叛,穿越历史的对照与反思。这里有抗战的烽火硝烟,天使和魔鬼的身影在这里碰撞与交错。这里没有正义和邪恶,这里没有对错。鹰击长空,鱼翔浅底,万类霜天竞自由。从都市的底层崛起,游走在仙侠世界和魔幻世界。经历着道德与自然的洗礼,完成自我的生命进化。这是一个草根的进化史。所以这本书的名字是《月上西楼之我的奋斗》!当然,也可以当作一本关于起点与都市的位面世界旅游笔记。纯属虚构如有雷同纯属巧合。
  • A Plea for Old Cap Collier

    A Plea for Old Cap Collier

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 都市之无敌强者

    都市之无敌强者

    他,是混沌和光明的传承者,在黑暗和光明的世界经历了几千万年,成为凌驾一切的存在,永生永世不灭,回到地球后,本以为地球有很大的改变,可发现,地球才过去4年,同时,各种美女投怀送抱。。。。。
  • 尸气冲天

    尸气冲天

    一个被劫杀致死的少年,异界重生,面对一切的未知,如何能够脚踏风云,呼风唤雨,这里没有任何仁慈,没有任何怜悯,有的只是这样一只只冰冷的尸体,和操作者,那么长生何求,万年的定律被谁打破/
  • 神玉令

    神玉令

    千年前,仙界与妖界大战,以妖王自曝而终结。仙界至宝——神玉令,也因此破损不知下落。斗转星移,一对天资聪颖的双胞胎姐妹,开始了奇妙的修仙历程。修复了元气的妖族,蠢蠢欲动。仙界战神却不知所踪。万年天劫的巨轮已然启动。仙界,妖族,人间,又将是怎样的一番景象?
  • 悲剧的人生(一生必读名家精品)

    悲剧的人生(一生必读名家精品)

    人生价值跳舞的时候我便跳舞,睡觉的时候我就睡觉。即便我一人在幽美的花园中散步,倘若我的思绪一时转到与散步无关的事物上去,我也会很快将思绪收回,令其想想花园,寻味独处的愉悦,思量一下我自己。天性促使我们为保证自身需要而进行活动,这种活动也就给我们带来愉快。慈母般的天性是顾及这一点的。它推动我们去满足理性与欲望的需要。打破它的规矩就违背情理了。
  • 赵珂

    赵珂

    如果有一天,你的身边多了一只鬼,你会怎么办?我是赵珂,我看见她了。“赵珂,你这个怪物,你去死吧!”她浑身滴着水地朝我走来,她没有朋友,没有亲人,因为她是怪物,被人所恐惧,她是赵珂。
  • 穿越梁祝之马文才与梁小祝

    穿越梁祝之马文才与梁小祝

    莫名的穿越,身份是什么?她一直都不知道。一直遇到第一个男人后,他竟然开口叫她祝英台。此刻的梁小祝犹如五雷轰顶。老天,你让我是谁不好,为什么偏偏是祝英台?自从祝英台消失后,马文才都在自暴自弃,为何迎娶英台当天竟会消失无踪。不信神鬼传说的他不断的在寻找那个熟悉的身影。他相信,祝英台总有一天会回来的...
  • 跟FBI学阅人术

    跟FBI学阅人术

    《跟FBI学阅人术》由蒋巍巍编著。美国联邦调查局(简称FBI)的特工人员在对犯罪主体的研究中总结出这样一句话:“在国际安全形势如此严峻的情况下,人们首先要做到识别一个人,在对这个人持续的观察中要真正分辨出这个人的内心变化情况,只有这样,才能做到准确的读懂他”。《跟FBI学阅人术:美国联邦特工识人密码》就是从犯罪心理学角度出发,从人的肢体语言、性格特征等多方面进行了有针对性的分析与研究。