登陆注册
15441000000004

第4章 IV

Poetry in general seems to have sprung from two causes, each of them lying deep in our nature. First, the instinct of imitation is implanted in man from childhood, one difference between him and other animals being that he is the most imitative of living creatures, and through imitation learns his earliest lessons; and no less universal is the pleasure felt in things imitated. We have evidence of this in the facts of experience. Objects which in themselves we view with pain, we delight to contemplate when reproduced with minute fidelity: such as the forms of the most ignoble animals and of dead bodies. The cause of this again is, that to learn gives the liveliest pleasure, not only to philosophers but to men in general; whose capacity, however, of learning is more limited. Thus the reason why men enjoy seeing a likeness is, that in contemplating it they find themselves learning or inferring, and saying perhaps, 'Ah, that is he.' For if you happen not to have seen the original, the pleasure will be due not to the imitation as such, but to the execution, the coloring, or some such other cause.

Imitation, then, is one instinct of our nature. Next, there is the instinct for 'harmony' and rhythm, meters being manifestly sections of rhythm. Persons, therefore, starting with this natural gift developed by degrees their special aptitudes, till their rude improvisations gave birth to Poetry.

Poetry now diverged in two directions, according to the individual character of the writers. The graver spirits imitated noble actions, and the actions of good men. The more trivial sort imitated the actions of meaner persons, at first composing satires, as the former did hymns to the gods and the praises of famous men. A poem of the satirical kind cannot indeed be put down to any author earlier than Homer; though many such writers probably there were. But from Homer onward, instances can be cited- his own Margites, for example, and other similar compositions. The appropriate meter was also here introduced; hence the measure is still called the iambic or lampooning measure, being that in which people lampooned one another. Thus the older poets were distinguished as writers of heroic or of lampooning verse.

As, in the serious style, Homer is pre-eminent among poets, for he alone combined dramatic form with excellence of imitation so he too first laid down the main lines of comedy, by dramatizing the ludicrous instead of writing personal satire. His Margites bears the same relation to comedy that the Iliad and Odyssey do to tragedy. But when Tragedy and Comedy came to light, the two classes of poets still followed their natural bent: the lampooners became writers of Comedy, and the Epic poets were succeeded by Tragedians, since the drama was a larger and higher form of art.

Whether Tragedy has as yet perfected its proper types or not; and whether it is to be judged in itself, or in relation also to the audience- this raises another question. Be that as it may, Tragedy- as also Comedy- was at first mere improvisation. The one originated with the authors of the Dithyramb, the other with those of the phallic songs, which are still in use in many of our cities. Tragedy advanced by slow degrees; each new element that showed itself was in turn developed. Having passed through many changes, it found its natural form, and there it stopped.

Aeschylus first introduced a second actor; he diminished the importance of the Chorus, and assigned the leading part to the dialogue. Sophocles raised the number of actors to three, and added scene-painting. Moreover, it was not till late that the short plot was discarded for one of greater compass, and the grotesque diction of the earlier satyric form for the stately manner of Tragedy. The iambic measure then replaced the trochaic tetrameter, which was originally employed when the poetry was of the satyric order, and had greater with dancing. Once dialogue had come in, Nature herself discovered the appropriate measure. For the iambic is, of all measures, the most colloquial we see it in the fact that conversational speech runs into iambic lines more frequently than into any other kind of verse; rarely into hexameters, and only when we drop the colloquial intonation. The additions to the number of 'episodes' or acts, and the other accessories of which tradition tells, must be taken as already described; for to discuss them in detail would, doubtless, be a large undertaking.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 福妻驾到

    福妻驾到

    现代饭店彪悍老板娘魂穿古代。不分是非的极品婆婆?三年未归生死不明的丈夫?心狠手辣的阴毒亲戚?贪婪而好色的地主老财?吃上顿没下顿的贫困宭境?不怕不怕,神仙相助,一技在手,天下我有!且看现代张悦娘,如何身带福气玩转古代,开面馆、收小弟、左纳财富,右傍美男,共绘幸福生活大好蓝图!!!!快本新书《天媒地聘》已经上架开始销售,只要3.99元即可将整本书抱回家,你还等什么哪,赶紧点击下面的直通车,享受乐乐精心为您准备的美食盛宴吧!)
  • 葬花传

    葬花传

    若不是天生命犯煞星,又怎会一生孤苦伶仃。若不是心地歹毒惹人寒,又怎会沦落处处惹人嫌。
  • 联对佳话(开启青少年智慧故事)

    联对佳话(开启青少年智慧故事)

    古往今来有许多字字珠玑的联对佳话,他们闪烁着智慧的火花。《联对佳话》收录了八仙桥上老翁遇帝、献字画巧讥财主、妙人儿倪家少女、纪昀妙联为帝乐等联对故事,这些故事集锦往往被当成教育青少年的重要内容。阅读此书,希望孩子们能从联对佳话中汲取智慧的营养。
  • 王君诗意

    王君诗意

    一本校园小说,希望能够找到你的影子。初次试文,请多包涵。
  • 在重庆的日子

    在重庆的日子

    一个从外地通过中考被迫离开父母来到重庆的女孩,在新的城市里会遇到怎样的奇遇?亲情,友情,是什么迷惑了女孩的双眼?因为与他们的相遇与认识,导致了她要忍受他人的嘲笑,妒忌,猜疑,在这,她又能否安静平常地过完三年,还是,,,这是一个女孩的经历,可是谁又能料到最后的结果呢?是冷漠如冰,拒人千里的他?还是阳光帅气的他?是可爱吃货的他?还是酷爱舞蹈,十分腼腆的他?还是腹黑如狐的他?还是他……是谁乱了她平静的生活?或者说是谁乱了他们的生活?本文纯属虚构,请勿当真。慢热。
  • 穿着裙子的灰姑娘

    穿着裙子的灰姑娘

    我恨你,南宫宇,我恨你……当初我追了你1年,你如果不喜欢我就不要答应我,你不要给我希望,再亲手毁掉……一段苦恋,擦肩10年,是否两个以后能再在一起
  • 互换协定:皇后速成

    互换协定:皇后速成

    本是一个倒霉透顶的小职员,如何速成皇后?!不用怕,尽在《互换协定:皇后速成》一个新的世界,又是一个崭新的我,谁说那帝王之心不可信,我就是那帝心引力。
  • 夜嫣然

    夜嫣然

    不醉一相逢,饮伤如流离,原来微湿是白衣,芳华几人记。当时笑归矣,仍是少年时。蹉跎早与流年欺,陌上岁月稀。是不是只有死了,才能相信彼此?紧握的双手,我们死也要在一起;只是前一刻,我们兵刃相交;血影流光,难道就是我们最后的接触?
  • 梵天大帝传

    梵天大帝传

    故事发生在坤元大陆,少年梦凡无意中得到一颗阴阳珠,从此踏上修行之路。穷五行,究阴阳,问神道……终成梵天,驾驭诸天!
  • 谁言编外军嫂情

    谁言编外军嫂情

    谁言编外军嫂情一路野风简介:缉毒爱情励志QQ516659288她与他一直是好朋友,却对他的情况不甚了解。当她知道他是个警官时,他却告知她要去执行任务,她要求他留在身边时遭到拒绝……然而感情可以神奇的建立,生活却不会一路平安,社会生活给人带来的是现实生活,而生活却是一把直刺心口的利刃。当她去部队寻找他时,他已经牺牲了……