Meanwhile their opponents were equally ready to see nothing in it but Malthus,and to denounce it with corresponding bitterness.It was contrary to Christianity to the rights of man,and to the good old laws of England.It was a part of the machinery by which cold-blooded economists were enslaving the poor.The operative,says the Chartist historian,(16)thought that it broke the last link in the chain of sympathy between rich and poor.Prison-like workhouses were rising to remind the poor of their 'coming doom.'They could expect nothing but 'misery in the present,and the Bastille in the future,in which they were to be immured when their rich oppressor no longer required their services.'The historian of the factory movement(17)confirms this statement.The poor man was to work or starve.Poverty,then,was to be treated as a crime.The parochial system was to be broken up,and the clergy thus separated from the poor.The whole system was anti-Christian:had not the commissioners put out a warning against alms-giving?(18)The commissioners again proposed the emigration of pauperised agricultural labourers into manufacturing districts,and were so playing into the hands of the capitalists.Cobbett's view gave the keynote to another version of the case.He saw as clearly as any one the evils of pauperisation,but the old law at least admitted the poor man's right to support.In good old times he had been supported by the church.The great robbery at the Reformation had been partly compensated by the poor-law.To abolish or restrict the old right was to consummate the abominable robbery and to fleece the poor man more thoroughly at the bidding of 'parson Malthus.'Cobbett's view not only commended itself to his own class,but was more or less that of the 'Young Englanders,'who aspired to a reconstruction of the old social order.The Times denounced the new law bitterly,and its proprietor,Walter,thought (as Kydd says),and no doubt thought rightly,that the indignation roused by the measure had done much to foster Chartism.(19)Meanwhile,to Mill and his friends the whole of this declamation came under the head of the later 'sentimentalism.'They held with Malthus that an unlimited right to support meant an indefinite multiplication of poverty.To admit the right was to undertake an impossible task and provoke a revolution on its inevitable failure.Right must be based upon fact;and it is idle to neglect the inevitable conditions of human life.This position might be logically unassailable;and the measure supported on the strength of it is now admitted to have been a vast reform.It came to be cited as one of the claims to gratitude of the economists.Their science had arrested an evil which appeared to be almost incurable.Sound reason had again triumphed over vague sentimentalism.The new law was,however,still given as an illustration of the heartlessness of political economists.Mill,who might claim justly that he was as anxious as any one to raise the poor,had sorrowfully to admit that the masses were too ignorant and their leaders too sentimental to recognise his good intentions.They took the surgeon for an assassin.
同类推荐
热门推荐
米欧,我的米欧
一个孤儿院出来的孩子布赛,在养父母家受尽白眼、呵斥。他渴望得到家庭温暖、渴望见到亲生父亲。突然有一天,他被一种神秘力量送到了“遥远之国”。在这里,他见到了自己的爸爸,而爸爸竟然就是这个国家的国王。爸爸称他“米欧,我的米欧”,给予他极大的爱心。但一个可怕的阴影慢慢侵入他的生活,因为在“遥远之国”的另一端“域外之国”,生活着残暴骑士卡托,他有一只铁手和一颗用石头做的心,他把小孩抓走变成鸟……米欧带着历史使命,带着父王的重望出发了,他要与邪恶做一番生死较量!错爱冷面老公:假婚真爱
他狠狠掐住她的喉咙:“说,谁派你来的?”她转动着水汪汪的大眼睛,谁派她来的???她怎么知道,她只不过是送便当的,在气息弥留之际,发出微弱的声音:“我妈。”???他有些诧异,她妈,她妈是谁,大脑横扫一遍,他也没伤过任何女人啊?难不成她是我女儿?不对呀,看年纪和我不相上下啊?难道是我妹?有可能!咣当一声,女孩倒在了地上...