登陆注册
15416700000030

第30章

I must preface the argument from precedent with a reference to what has been said already in the first Lecture about early forms of liability, and especially about the appeals.It was there shown that the appeals de pace et plagis and of mayhem became the action of trespass, and that those appeals and the early actions of trespass were always, so far as appears, for intentional wrongs. The contra pacem in the writ of trespass was no doubt inserted to lay a foundation for the king's writ; but there seems to be no reason to attribute a similar purpose to vi et armis, or cum vi sua, as it was often put.Glanvill says that wounds are within the sheriff's jurisdiction, unless the appellor adds a charge of breach of the king's peace. Yet the wounds are given vi et armis as much in the one case as in the other.Bracton says that the lesser wrongs described by him belong to the king's jurisdiction, "because they are sometimes against the peace of our lord the king," while, as has been observed, they were supposed to be always committed intentionally.It might even perhaps be inferred that the allegation contra pacem was originally material, and it will be remembered that trespasses formerly involved the liability to pay a fine to the king. If it be true that trespass was originally confined to intentional wrongs, it is hardly necessary to consider the argument drawn from the scope of the general issue.In form it was a mitigation of the strict denial de verbo in verbum of the ancient procedure, to which the inquest given by the king's writ was unknown. The strict form seems to have lasted in England some time after the trial of the issue by recognition was introduced. When a recognition was granted, the inquest was, of course, only competent to speak to the facts, as has been said above. When the general issue was introduced, trespass was still confined to intentional wrongs.

We may now take up the authorities.It will be remembered that the earlier precedents are of a date when the assize and jurata had not given place to the modern jury.These bodies spoke from their own knowledge to an issue defined by the writ, or to certain familiar questions of fact arising in the trial of a cause, but did not hear the whole case upon evidence adduced.

Their function was more limited than that which has been gained by the jury, and it naturally happened that, when they had declared what the defendant had done, the judges laid down the standard by which those acts were to be measured without their assistance.Hence the question in the Year Books is not a loose or general inquiry of the jury whether they think the alleged trespasser was negligent on such facts as they may find, but a well-defined issue of law, to be determined by the court, whether certain acts set forth upon the record are a ground of liability.

It is possible that the judges may have dealt pretty strictly with defendants, and it is quite easy to pass from the premise that defendants have been held trespassers for a variety of acts, without mention of neglect, to the conclusion that any act by which another was damaged will make the actor chargeable.But a more exact scrutiny of the early books will show that liability in general, then as later, was founded on the opinion of the tribunal that the defendant ought to have acted otherwise, or, in other words, that he was to blame.

Returning first to the case of the thorns in the Year Book, it will be seen that the falling of the thorns into the plaintiff's close, although a result not wished by the defendant, was in no other sense against his will.When he cut the thorns, he did an act which obviously and necessarily would have that consequence, and he must be taken to have foreseen and not to have prevented it.Choke, C.J.says, "As to what was said about their falling in, ipso invito, that is no plea, but he ought to show that he could not do it in any other way, or that he did all in his power to keep them out"; and both the judges put the unlawfulness of the entry upon the plaintiff's land as a consequence of the unlawfulness of dropping the thorns there.

Choke admits that, if the thorns or a tree had been blown over upon the plaintiff's land, the defendant might have entered to get them.Chief Justice Crew says of this case, in Millen v.

Fawdry, that the opinion was that "trespass lies, because he did not plead that he did his best endeavor to hinder their falling there; yet this was a hard case." The statements of law by counsel in argument may be left on one side, although Brian is quoted and mistaken for one of the judges by Sir William Blackstone, in Scott v.Shepherd.

The principal authorities are the shooting cases, and, as shooting is an extra- hazardous act, it would not be surprising if it should be held that men do it at their peril in public places.The liability has been put on the general ground of fault, however, wherever the line of necessary precaution may be drawn.In Weaver v.Ward, the defendant set up that the plaintiff and he were skirmishing in a trainband, and that when discharging his piece he wounded the plaintiff by accident and misfortune, and against his own will.On demurrer, the court says that "no man shall be excused of a trespass,...except it may be judged utterly without his fault.As if a man by force take my hand and strike you, or if here the defendant had said, that the plaintiff ran cross his piece when it was discharging, or had set forth the case with the circumstances so as it had appeared to the court that it had been inevitable, and that the defendant had committed no negligence to give occasion to the hurt." The later cases simply follow Weaver v.Ward.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 神魔遗孤

    神魔遗孤

    神王和魔王的孩子来到世界,代替父母重新见证世界的变迁,有着不凡的血脉却想过普通人类的生活,沉默的他在全新的世界历练自己。
  • 方与圆:左右逢源的处世之道

    方与圆:左右逢源的处世之道

    “建功立业者,多虚圆之士;愤事失机者,多执拗之人”。方和圆缺一不可,但是有一个“度”的限制。过分的方正是固执,会四处碰壁;过分的圆滑是世故,也会众叛亲离。所以做人的制高点是外圆内方,就是行欲方而智欲圆。真正的“方圆”人是大智慧与大容忍的结合体,有勇猛斗士的武力,有沉静蕴慧的平和。
  • 异道灭神

    异道灭神

    这里充满天地元素!这里以元素之力塑造异体!这里异能的世界!残魂的少年踏上废材之路!一日、天魂归位踏上灭神之路!
  • 双色鱼

    双色鱼

    善良单纯成了别人欺负、玩弄自己感情的砝码,林蕊内心深处的双鱼女黑暗极端性格被激发,时间和生活把她打磨成另外一个模样,她开始对渣男前任展开一系列的疯狂报复
  • 邪君噬天

    邪君噬天

    一搬砖屌丝萧风,在找“站街女”风流之后,被扫黄。去警局的路上突遇车祸并穿越....穿越途中,竟意外的融合了上古大能的一丝残魂凝成的”戮天指环”,并在其中获得一本可升级功法一本。此功法名为《噬天决》进阶的条件竟然是需要吞噬各种稀有的—极致之力!菩提之果,极致生命之力.....(养料)。地心焰炎,极致焚烧之力。。。(养料)。管理群:323412550极地冰蕊,极致寒冷之力。。。(养料)。读者群:323420787还有好多极致之力,都成为了他通往巅峰之路的养料。新书等级分配,猝体境,炼体境,凝气境,气旋境,定魂境,红尘境,归元境等等。萧风曾经说过一句话:“跟我合作的人,他们现在都很好,跟我作对的人,现在,全部都已经消失了....
  • 蝴蝶梦

    蝴蝶梦

    这是一个全新的江湖,一个梦里才会出现的江湖,所有人都脱不开,甩不掉的梦,他们永远都会在梦里去相逢,相爱,相离,等梦醒的时候,才发现他们刚刚入梦。
  • 零度仙狐

    零度仙狐

    仙狐公主无意穿越古代,得罪孟府公子。得到同伴,上演奇缘,言情,和魔幻。她到最后葬在了谁手?她到最后又救了谁命?她此时只想哀嚎:好烦!我想回家!
  • 怒战星河

    怒战星河

    因为人口大爆炸,地球政府决定实行放逐计划,将监狱中的囚犯流放至5.5万光年以外的星系之中。被放逐的人群(Terran人族)并没有自此灭亡,而是在遥远的星际中发展出了远超地球的科技,并且从放逐星系不断扩张!在这个镭射枪和电磁炮为战争主旋律的时代,出现了一批不合逻辑的战争狂人。他们挥舞着原始刀枪,穿着荒野兽皮;但他们的身躯固若金刚,他们的呐喊壮若雷鸣!——当游荡星河的terran巨无霸航母遇到史诗中降临的巨龙,当porotos光明执政官的雷电裁决遇到圣域魔导的星云闪电,当zerg(异虫)女皇的虫灾遇上萨满女巫的亡灵召唤,当宏伟的机甲金刚遇上山岳般的戈伦石人,当幽能讯号接收到心灵链接发来的宣战……战争,一触即发!这支让人闻风丧胆的铁血军团,来自某个家伙的部落系统,并且只为他服务。而他发起战争的原因,只是想凑够奖杯……然后回家!
  • 美女总裁老婆

    美女总裁老婆

    获得魔神传承,从此开启争霸之路!
  • 快穿说女配上位

    快穿说女配上位

    我是初次写小说,每天下午1:00一更,晚上10:00一更,有时还会加更哦。本书为快穿,女主安雅爱上了校草薛弈而相貌平平的女配是家产万贯的千金小姐,女配莫婷爸爸的公司倒闭,莫婷嫉妒安雅和高富帅薛弈在一起,便假装和安雅交好,一起参加校园舞会,给她了错误风格,让她身败名裂,而莫婷的百褶裙加上优美的舞蹈,得到大家的瞩目,男主男配都以为莫婷是一朵白莲花而追求她。莫婷和安雅失去联系,但在某一天安雅开车上学的路上被莫婷撞了,两人都进了医院莫婷是皮外伤,而安雅抢救无效,系统250让安雅颠覆女配的生活,让最终的她回到舞会之前。