登陆注册
15401600000036

第36章 THE NEW TESTAMENT THE (3)

Not any two of these writers agree in reciting, exactly in the same words, the written inscription, short as it is, which they tell us was put over Christ when he was crucified; and besides this, Mark says, He was crucified at the third hour, (nine in the morning;) and John says it was the sixth hour, (twelve at noon.) [According to John, (xix.14) the sentence was not passed till about the sixth hour (noon,) and consequently the execution could not be till the afternoon; but Mark (xv.25) Says expressly that he was crucified at the third hour, (nine in the moming,) -- Author.]

The inscription is thus stated in those books: Matthew -- This is Jesus the king of the Jews.

Mark -- The king of the Jews.

Luke -- This is the king of the Jews.

John -- Jesus of Nazareth the king of the Jews.We may infer from these circumstances, trivial as they are, that those writers, whoever they were, and in whatever time they lived, were not present at the scene.The only one of the men called apostles who appears to have been near to the spot was Peter, and when he was accused of being one of Jesus's followers, it is said, (Matthew xxvi.74,) "Then Peter began to curse and to swear, saying, I know not the man:" yet we are now called to believe the same Peter, convicted, by their own account, of perjury.

For what reason, or on what authority, should we do this?

The accounts that are given of the circumstances, that they tell us attended the crucifixion, are differently related in those four books.

The book ascribed to Matthew says 'there was darkness over all the land from the sixth hour unto the ninth hour -- that the veil of the temple was rent in twain from the top to the bottom -- that there was an earthquake -- that the rocks rent -- that the graves opened, that the bodies of many of the saints that slept arose and came out of their graves after the resurrection, and went into the holy city and appeared unto many.' Such is the account which this dashing writer of the book of Matthew gives, but in which he is not supported by the writers of the other books.

The writer of the book ascribed to Mark, in detailing the circumstances of the crucifixion, makes no mention of any earthquake, nor of the rocks rending, nor of the graves opening, nor of the dead men walking out.The writer of the book of Luke is silent also upon the same points.And as to the writer of the book of John, though he details all the circumstances of the crucifixion down to the burial of Christ, he says nothing about either the darkness -- the veil of the temple -- the earthquake -- the rocks -- the graves -- nor the dead men.

Now if it had been true that these things had happened, and if the writers of these books had lived at the time they did happen, and had been the persons they are said to be -- namely, the four men called apostles, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, -- it was not possible for them, as true historians, even without the aid of inspiration, not to have recorded them.The things, supposing them to have been facts, were of too much notoriety not to have been known, and of too much importance not to have been told.All these supposed apostles must have been witnesses of the earthquake, if there had been any, for it was not possible for them to have been absent from it: the opening of the graves and resurrection of the dead men, and their walking about the city, is of still greater importance than the earthquake.

An earthquake is always possible, and natural, and proves nothing; but this opening of the graves is supernatural, and directly in point to their doctrine, their cause, and their apostleship.Had it been true, it would have filled up whole chapters of those books, and been the chosen theme and general chorus of all the writers; but instead of this, little and trivial things, and mere prattling conversation of 'he said this and she said that' are often tediously detailed, while this most important of all, had it been true, is passed off in a slovenly manner by a single dash of the pen, and that by one writer only, and not so much as hinted at by the rest.

It is an easy thing to tell a lie, but it is difficult to support the lie after it is told.The writer of the book of Matthew should have told us who the saints were that came to life again, and went into the city, and what became of them afterwards, and who it was that saw them; for he is not hardy enough to say that he saw them himself; -- whether they came out naked, and all in natural buff, he-saints and she-saints, or whether they came full dressed, and where they got their dresses; whether they went to their former habitations, and reclaimed their wives, their husbands, and their property, and how they were received; whether they entered ejectments for the recovery of their possessions, or brought actions of crim.con.

against the rival interlopers; whether they remained on earth, and followed their former occupation of preaching or working; or whether they died again, or went back to their graves alive, and buried themselves.

Strange indeed, that an army of saints should retum to life, and nobody know who they were, nor who it was that saw them, and that not a word more should be said upon the subject, nor these saints have any thing to tell us! Had it been the prophets who (as we are told) had formerly prophesied of these things, they must have had a great deal to say.They could have told us everything, and we should have had posthumous prophecies, with notes and commentaries upon the first, a little better at least than we have now.Had it been Moses, and Aaron, and Joshua, and Samuel, and David, not an unconverted Jew had remained in all Jerusalem.Had it been John the Baptist, and the saints of the times then present, everybody would have known them, and they would have out-preached and out-famed all the other apostles.But, instead of this, these saints are made to pop up, like Jonah's gourd in the night, for no purpose at all but to wither in the morning.-- Thus much for this part of the story.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 飘渺星尊

    飘渺星尊

    “我竟然是残缺魂魄的断魂体,我居然是一个只有一魂三魄的人;我为什么依然活着呢?”星宇有些不敢相信,自己居然是一个残缺的断魂体。
  • 暧昧之王者归来

    暧昧之王者归来

    流氓不可怕,就怕流氓有文化。二十一世纪屌丝男秦风穿越异界成了秦寿秦大少,好吧,禽兽也就算了,莫名成了臭名昭著的美男子,秦大少表示淡定。什么?本少不会文化?以本少惊天地之鬼才,尔等不过区区鱼虫烂下尔耳。什么?本少不会武功,打得你爹妈不认识。于是,某人到处浪,他决定将流氓文化发扬光大......
  • 英雄联盟之最强王者

    英雄联盟之最强王者

    作为曾经在青铜组为最强王者的江逸涵,终于在大学开学的前一天成功的成为了一个白银级别的强者。满怀雄心壮志的江逸涵在踏入大学门口的那一刻在心里暗暗的发誓,自己一定会让这所大学里的人知道我这个青铜组最强王者的厉害,然后在去征服整个世界!不过在这之前,还有一个巨大在障碍挡在江逸涵的面前,如果自己不能征服她们的话,又怎么可能征服这个世界呢?
  • 毒皇后:误惹风流夫君

    毒皇后:误惹风流夫君

    烈国史书上记载,左相之女贺绮岚,生得芙蓉姿,伤残身。却智谋过人,城府深深。巧施妙计,沧澜倾,暗中献计破奇阵,桓国灭。江山一统,功过半。一朝入得君王侧,六宫粉黛无颜色。却也被史官批注,贺皇后此人智谋超群,城府深深,手段毒辣狠绝,因此朝野上下,称呼其为毒皇后。此称呼从此青史留名,流芳百世!前世里,她是年仅二十六岁的心理学和经济学双博士,她天纵奇才,惹得天怒人怨!怎料天妒奇才,在她最年轻貌美的年华,死于空难!一朝穿越为大烈国相府,最得宠的千金二小姐,却得了个芙蓉貌,伤残身。至孝之女,得到太后的怜爱,在及笄之年,将其接入宫中,本想让其安度余生。怎料想,接来个原子弹,宫娥嫔妃各个被炸得体无完肤。
  • 考古遗记

    考古遗记

    一代商朝妖女苏妲己,复活在21世纪,体内存在不明物质,导致其长生不死。一个狐狸脑袋,一场考古奇遇,非洲金字塔,欧洲吸血古堡...“长生之谜”“冰川丽影”超脱科学可以解释的领域,一步一步慢慢解开。从而引发一系列全球考古探险。————本书交流群:242523407欢迎各位加入。
  • 不败神话

    不败神话

    世界上有那么一支神秘的部队,有人说他们是某国家的一支特种部队,有人说他们是杀手界的一支杀手部队,又有人说他们是佣兵界排名第一的佣兵团,人数不详,有的说十几个人,有的说几百人,有的说千人,更有的说上万人,不过可以确定的是这个部队中的单兵作战能力都超越了特种兵的存在。
  • 蛮妖纪

    蛮妖纪

    浩瀚天际中一颗最不起眼的星辰,打破了平静万载的万千界面……
  • 创神界

    创神界

    地下城与勇士中的阿拉德大陆,危机重重,异变的魔兽,苏醒的深渊,还有蠢蠢欲动的魔界。少年被妹妹的魂魄带到了这个世界,七个鬼神加身,使得他踏进了这个奇异的世界。鬼神只能为我所用,深渊终会被我踏破,天界的战火由我来平息,还有那魔界将由我覆灭。这一次,我一定要守护好我爱的人。守护好那一丝温暖。(附加;本书中妹子众多,萝莉一筐,思想纯洁的妹控、萝莉控请进来吧。)
  • 婚动全球:首席娇妻宠不够

    婚动全球:首席娇妻宠不够

    某女成为仲家少奶奶后,某男为了讨得她的欢心,一个月来不停以鲜花,钻石攻势。某女:“老公你不爱我。”某男:“嗯?”他可是天天又送礼物,又时时陪着她,这还不叫爱?某女:“老公,你送的礼物又不能陪人解闷。”某女声音小小。某男:“……”什么可以解闷呢?几秒钟后,某男的眼睛猛地发光,一把抱起发呆的某女走向卧室。“啊?老公你干嘛?”某女尖叫。“关门……造人!”某男坏笑,有了小宝宝,看她还闷不闷。
  • 赏金勇士

    赏金勇士

    27世纪,一场大破灭后,这时的水蓝星大半领土已被异变生物所占领。在这末世之中,且看轩凡如何实现心中的梦想,成为一名赏金勇士