登陆注册
15399200000012

第12章

But [though sound and odour may travel,] with regard to Light the case is different. For Light has its raison d'etre in the being [not becoming] of something, but it is not a movement. And in general, even in qualitative change the case is different from what it is in local movement [both being different species of kinesis]. Local movements, of course, arrive first at a point midway before reaching their goal (and Sound, it is currently believed, is a movement of something locally moved), but we cannot go on to assert this [arrival at a point midway] like manner of things which undergo qualitative change. For this kind of change may conceivably take place in a thing all at once, without one half of it being changed before the other; e.g. it is conceivable that water should be frozen simultaneously in every part. But still, for all that, if the body which is heated or frozen is extensive, each part of it successively is affected by the part contiguous, while the part first changed in quality is so changed by the cause itself which originates the change, and thus the change throughout the whole need not take place coinstantaneously and all at once. Tasting would have been as smelling now is, if we lived in a liquid medium, and perceived [the sapid object] at a distance, before touching it.

Naturally, then, the parts of media between a sensory organ and its object are not all affected at once- except in the case of Light [illumination] for the reason above stated, and also in the case of seeing, for the same reason; for Light is an efficient cause of seeing.

Another question respecting sense-perception is as follows:

assuming, as is natural, that of two [simultaneous] sensory stimuli the stronger always tends to extrude the weaker [from consciousness], is it conceivable or not that one should be able to discern two objects coinstantaneously in the same individual time? The above assumption explains why persons do not perceive what is brought before their eyes, if they are at the time deep in thought, or in a fright, or listening to some loud noise. This assumption, then, must be made, and also the following: that it is easier to discern each object of sense when in its simple form than when an ingredient in a mixture; easier, for example, to discern wine when neat than when blended, and so also honey, and [in other provinces] a colour, or to discern the nete by itself alone, than [when sounded with the hypate] in the octave; the reason being that component elements tend to efface [the distinctive characteristics of] one another. Such is the effect [on one another] of all ingredients of which, when compounded, some one thing is formed.

If, then, the greater stimulus tends to expel the less, it necessarily follows that, when they concur, this greater should itself too be less distinctly perceptible than if it were alone, since the less by blending with it has removed some of its individuality, according to our assumption that simple objects are in all cases more distinctly perceptible.

Now, if the two stimuli are equal but heterogeneous, no perception of either will ensue; they will alike efface one another's characteristics. But in such a case the perception of either stimulus in its simple form is impossible. Hence either there will then be no sense-perception at all, or there will be a perception compounded of both and differing from either. The latter is what actually seems to result from ingredients blended together, whatever may be the compound in which they are so mixed.

Since, then, from some concurrent [sensory stimuli] a resultant object is produced, while from others no such resultant is produced, and of the latter sort are those things which belong to different sense provinces (for only those things are capable of mixture whose extremes are contraries, and no one compound can be formed from, e.g. White and Sharp, except indirectly, i.e. not as a concord is formed of Sharp and Grave); there follows logically the impossibility of discerning such concurrent stimuli coinstantaneously.

For we must suppose that the stimuli, when equal, tend alike to efface one another, since no one [form of stimulus] results from them; while, if they are unequal, the stronger alone is distinctly perceptible.

Again, the soul would be more likely to perceive coinstantaneously, with one and the same sensory act, two things in the same sensory province, such as the Grave and the Sharp in sound;for the sensory stimulation in this one province is more likely to be unitemporal than that involving two different provinces, as Sight and Hearing. But it is impossible to perceive two objects coinstantaneously in the same sensory act unless they have been mixed, [when, however, they are no longer two], for their amalgamation involves their becoming one, and the sensory act related to one object is itself one, and such act, when one, is, of course, coinstantaneous with itself. Hence, when things are mixed we of necessity perceive them coinstantaneously: for we perceive them by a perception actually one. For an object numerically one means that which is perceived by a perception actually one, whereas an object specifically one means that which is perceived by a sensory act potentially one [i.e. by an energeia of the same sensuous faculty]. If then the actualized perception is one, it will declare its data to be one object; they must, therefore, have been mixed. Accordingly, when they have not been mixed, the actualized perceptions which perceive them will be two; but [if so, their perception must be successive not coinstantaneous, for] in one and the same faculty the perception actualized at any single moment is necessarily one, only one stimulation or exertion of a single faculty being possible at a single instant, and in the case supposed here the faculty is one. It follows, therefore, that we cannot conceive the possibility of perceiving two distinct objects coinstantaneously with one and the same sense.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 调皮公主遇上爱

    调皮公主遇上爱

    看我们的甜心小丫如何斗情敌,会花痴,打渣男,找到属于自己的那份幸福。
  • 网游之救赎之光

    网游之救赎之光

    高拟真的虚拟游戏,与真人无异的npc,凶猛的魔兽,诡计的敌人,看枷(jia)楠(nan)如何和朋友一起面对他们。不管前路是多么黑暗,我们都毫无畏惧。
  • 圣魔君帝

    圣魔君帝

    远古时代,众神争霸,然而一场浩劫突然降临,诸神阵亡,只有最强的神君活了下来,浩劫之后,却无法产生新的神,成神之路已断,只为成神!
  • 反正不灭

    反正不灭

    这是舍利子?有这种比篮球还大的舍利子吗?
  • 草包废柴庶女闯天下

    草包废柴庶女闯天下

    一个被世人称为“草包废柴”的丞相府大小姐,什么?不能修炼?开的什么国际玩笑啊,她是来自21世纪的国际警察,且看“草包废柴”大小姐怎样翻身吧。
  • 假爱真情

    假爱真情

    新婚当天老公离奇暴毙,我却怀孕了,原来他一直瞒着我做......
  • 净化管道

    净化管道

    末世来临,刘封想要活下去,上天给了刘封一个金手指,一个奇怪的管道,分裂,重组,质变,什么都可以,刘封以管道的能力,变化成管道巨人。。。
  • 独宠特工穿越:魔妃不逆天

    独宠特工穿越:魔妃不逆天

    这是个神奇的大陆,斗气盛行。被爱人亲自射杀,她穿越。整个大陆皆知的废物?她灿然一笑,那都是骗你的。苦苦修炼,她要做人上人。这里,阴谋诡计并不少,爱恨情仇皆有之,却治愈了每个人的心。阎王冥渊的情劫,尊贵王爷上官傲夜的前世今生,青楼头牌花殇的一生陪伴,魔尊魔楼天的命中人,萌太子上官浠澈的追随,右丞相苏御轩的苦苦等待……每一个人,都有与她同生共死的经历,那么……终究谁是她注定的爱人?
  • 落尘传奇

    落尘传奇

    三百年前天魔大战,两败俱伤,天君陨落,魔界被封,人间大陆,四分天下,三百年后,一个天生魂魄不全的孤儿落尘在不知不觉中开启了他人生的轨迹,是福是祸,一切都是天注定。
  • 霸道总裁的萌萌妻,快到碗里来

    霸道总裁的萌萌妻,快到碗里来

    无意间闯入酒店,蓝小小发现自己最爱的清纯女神竟然一丝不挂地躺在一个男人的身下,她义愤填膺,冲进房间,却霸道地被侵犯了身体,从此,她的生活,一直被这个男人占据着!