登陆注册
15299900000111

第111章

attend to these principles of common sense; and this would make his appeal to be, like that of Kant and Hamilton, to stern necessity.It is worthy of being stated that, in his manuscript papers, an answer is attempted to some of these questions, and this of a more satisfactory kind than any thing I have noticed in his published writings." As soon as this truth is understood, that two and two make four, I immediately assent to it; because God has given me the faculty of immediately discerning its truth, and if Ihad not this faculty, I would not perceive its truth.The truth {224} itself, therefore, does not depend on my constitution; for it was a truth before my existence, and will be a truth, although I were annihilated: but my perception evidently depends on my constitution, and particularly upon my having, as a part of my constitution, that faculty, whether you call it reason or common sense, by which I perceive or discern this truth." "The truth of this proposition, that a lion is a ravenous beast, depends on the constitution of a lion, and upon nothing else." In like manner as to right and wrong "although the rectitude or depravity has a real existence in this case, yet it cannot be discerned by a spectator who has not the faculty of discerning objects of this kind." "Evidence is the sole and ultimate ground of belief, and self-evidence is the strongest possible ground of belief; and he who desires reason for believing what is self-evident knows not what he means." Any one who would join into a consistent whole the various characteristics referred to in this paper, and give each its exact place, will advance a step beyond Reid, and, I may add, beyond Hamilton.The question occurs, Why has he not' placed these statements in his published works? Was it because he was not prepared to reduce them to a rigid consistency, and was averse to utter anything which he could not stand by in every respect?

It is also worthy of being noticed that, in one of the manuscripts, he shows that he had a glimpse of the distinction between what Kant calls analytic and synthetic judgments.The question is put, "Is there not a difference between the evidence of some first principles and others?"and he answers, "There are various differences.This seems to be one, that, in some first principles, the predicate of the proposition is evidently contained in the subject, as in this, two and three are equal to five, a man has flesh and blood; for, in these and the like self-evident principles, the subject includes the predicate in the very notion of it.

There are other first principles in which the predicate is not contained in the notion of the subject, as when we affirm that a thing which begins to exist must have a cause." This last is an example of what Kant calls synthetic judgments a priori.Reid, however, has not laid hold of the distinction so firmly as Kant, nor did he see its importance, and elaborate it so fully as the great German metaphysician.It is interesting to notice these correspondences between the Scottish and German opponents of Hume.{225}

I do not mean to dwell on the remaining portion of the essays, which contain many sound remarks, but little that is fresh and novel.

<Reasoning>.This essay has nothing worthy of comment, except a vigorous attempt to show, as against Locke, that morality is not capable of demonstration.

<Taste>.He argues that "it implies an original faculty, and that it is in the moral and intellectual perfections of mind, and in its active powers, that beauty originally dwells." In a letter to Rev.Archibald Alison, he claims: " I am proud to think that I first, in clear and explicit terms, and in the cool blood of a philosopher, maintained that all the beauty and sublimity of objects of sense is derived from the expression they exhibit of things intellectual, which alone have original beauty." (p.89.)Possibly this may be a pretty close approximation to the truth.It seems to me to be a more just and enlightened view than that presented by Alison, and those Scotch metaphysicians who refer beauty to the association of ideas capable of raising feeling.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 付与丹青姓字标

    付与丹青姓字标

    你永遠都不知道自己是如何進入的一場夢境,或許我可以冠冕堂皇的將其稱之為夢想。父母留給我看似進步的思想,於我,是否僅僅是一場束縛。這究竟是我的夢想,還是我在努力所填充的心中的空缺。我叫荀卿邱,17歲,今日冬至,我還未卸掉紅拂的插戴。母親說,她和紅拂的糾纏始於她17歲的冬至夜。其實我對於母親的記憶并不多,都是後來從她日記中讀到的。他們說,我母親是留洋回來的深知民族大義的知識女性,但為何,我所感受到的僅僅是那幽怨哀婉的掙扎。他們說,我父親是家學淵源的翩翩公子。他們說,我母親很愛我的父親。他們說,我本不該入梨園行。父親說,人生若戲,不成瘋魔,不成活。母親說,那年,冬至……
  • 杀手崛起

    杀手崛起

    一代铁血杀手的成长史,高科技魔法亦不能阻止黑暗战神统一宇宙的步伐....
  • 穿越之刘一舟新传

    穿越之刘一舟新传

    主角穿越到《鹿鼎记》中,并附身到那个胆小如鼠,无能之极的刘一舟身上。于是一个全新的刘一舟出现在江湖上,他的命运是否能够改写。。。。。。
  • 沦陷于你

    沦陷于你

    这是一个暖心治愈向的故事,一个在娱乐圈风生水起的高干子弟与一个看似平凡无奇的小歌手之间的有趣故事.“如果我说,对于你一见钟情,你相信么?”腹黑攻×清冷傲娇受.
  • 我们身边的空缺

    我们身边的空缺

    《我们身边的空缺》作者高安侠通过富有鲜明个性的文字,充分地将自己对人生、对社会独特的生命体验与感悟凸显出来。关注“人”,特别是关注身边小人物,他们的苦痛作者感同身受,在平静的文字背后暗藏悲天悯人的情怀,充满了个性和智慧。在文本中有很大比重的作品是对历史的独特诠释,作者常常试图叩开锈迹斑驳的历史之门,造访历史。《我们身边的空缺》以古人古事为题材,诠释那一个个高贵的或者是丑恶的灵魂,非常智慧地注入她自己独特而新鲜的感悟与见解,时不时闪现一种超越时空的哲思,令人耳目一新。
  • 遇晚明晰晴好

    遇晚明晰晴好

    命运让她们相遇,也让他和她相遇,...而当友情与爱情一起破碎,她,该作何抉择?“小晚,我会爱你一辈子,我要永远为你打伞!”“小晚,我们永远都是好姐妹!同甘苦,共患难!”............“夏晚,你别天真了,谁会不顾自己,只为陪着你?!”难道.....都是一场梦么........
  • 东方玄武纪

    东方玄武纪

    就是讲一个一心想要成为流芳百世的大诗人、大才子的少年,被自己的土匪老爹所坑,最终成了一个遗臭万年的大屠夫、大暴君的故事······
  • 转瞬

    转瞬

    我要登上九天神塔,摘下最美的王冠,再来娶你!逆袭的套路要深才能娶女主
  • 第一宠婚:豪门小撩妻

    第一宠婚:豪门小撩妻

    大boss指了指隔壁的独立办公室——“明天开始坐那里,不用拿部门的快递了。”她讷讷点头,从公司最底层的实习生一跃当上总裁助理。大boss瞥了瞥桌上的廉价手提包——“扔了吧,这玩意儿掉我的价。”她讷讷点头,成了总裁鲜亮的小尾巴,脊梁骨却快被同事戳烂。大boss招了招手,这回没说话,直接丢过来一个软绵绵香喷喷的东西。“从今往后你是这娃娃的妈。”她讷讷点头……等等,妈?!襁褓里的宝宝冲她咯咯直笑,季琛衣抬头,欲哭无泪。“大老板,能拒绝吗?”韩誉挑眉,“你说呢?”
  • 婚非得已:总裁的替身娇妻

    婚非得已:总裁的替身娇妻

    小时候的一场承诺,长大后的他却不识得自己的妻子就是小时候定下誓约的女孩。多年之前的雉儿约定,让她在人群中一眼就看到了那个曾经对自己呵护犹如珍宝的男孩。当身世之谜浮出水面,当多年之前的隐私再掀波澜,且看两个人如何抉择一段爱恋,多年之前的约定如今是否还能再续前缘,当爱情中存在了欺骗,他还会不会愿意接受这段情缘。