登陆注册
14817900000022

第22章

It may have been slower with some, quicker with others. Some tribes may have used shorter, others longer words or cries: they may have been more or less inclined to agglutinate or to decompose them: they may have modified them by the use of prefixes, suffixes, infixes; by the lengthening and strengthening of vowels or by the shortening and weakening of them, by the condensation or rarefaction of consonants. But who gave to language these primeval laws; or why one race has triliteral, another biliteral roots; or why in some members of a group of languages b becomes p, or d, t, or ch, k; or why two languages resemble one another in certain parts of their structure and differ in others; or why in one language there is a greater development of vowels, in another of consonants, and the like--are questions of which we only 'entertain conjecture.' We must remember the length of time that has elapsed since man first walked upon the earth, and that in this vast but unknown period every variety of language may have been in process of formation and decay, many times over.

(Compare Plato, Laws):--'ATHENIAN STRANGER: And what then is to be regarded as the origin of government? Will not a man be able to judge best from a point of view in which he may behold the progress of states and their transitions to good and evil?

CLEINIAS: What do you mean?

ATHENIAN STRANGER: I mean that he might watch them from the point of view of time, and observe the changes which take place in them during infinite ages.

CLEINIAS: How so?

ATHENIAN STRANGER: Why, do you think that you can reckon the time which has elapsed since cities first existed and men were citizens of them?

CLEINIAS: Hardly.

ATHENIAN STRANGER: But you are quite sure that it must be vast and incalculable?

CLEINIAS: No doubt.

ATHENIAN STRANGER: And have there not been thousands and thousands of cities which have come into being and perished during this period? And has not every place had endless forms of government, and been sometimes rising, and at other times falling, and again improving or waning?'

Aristot. Metaph.:--'And if a person should conceive the tales of mythology to mean only that men thought the gods to be the first essences of things, he would deem the reflection to have been inspired and would consider that, whereas probably every art and part of wisdom had been DISCOVERED AND LOST MANY TIMES OVER, such notions were but a remnant of the past which has survived to our day.')

It can hardly be supposed that any traces of an original language still survive, any more than of the first huts or buildings which were constructed by man. Nor are we at all certain of the relation, if any, in which the greater families of languages stand to each other. The influence of individuals must always have been a disturbing element. Like great writers in later times, there may have been many a barbaric genius who taught the men of his tribe to sing or speak, showing them by example how to continue or divide their words, charming their souls with rhythm and accent and intonation, finding in familiar objects the expression of their confused fancies--to whom the whole of language might in truth be said to be a figure of speech. One person may have introduced a new custom into the formation or pronunciation of a word; he may have been imitated by others, and the custom, or form, or accent, or quantity, or rhyme which he introduced in a single word may have become the type on which many other words or inflexions of words were framed, and may have quickly ran through a whole language. For like the other gifts which nature has bestowed upon man, that of speech has been conveyed to him through the medium, not of the many, but of the few, who were his 'law-givers'--'the legislator with the dialectician standing on his right hand,' in Plato's striking image, who formed the manners of men and gave them customs, whose voice and look and behaviour, whose gesticulations and other peculiarities were instinctively imitated by them,--the 'king of men' who was their priest, almost their God...But these are conjectures only: so little do we know of the origin of language that the real scholar is indisposed to touch the subject at all.

(2) There are other errors besides the figment of a primitive or original language which it is time to leave behind us. We no longer divide languages into synthetical and analytical, or suppose similarity of structure to be the safe or only guide to the affinities of them. We do not confuse the parts of speech with the categories of Logic. Nor do we conceive languages any more than civilisations to be in a state of dissolution; they do not easily pass away, but are far more tenacious of life than the tribes by whom they are spoken. 'Where two or three are gathered together,' they survive. As in the human frame, as in the state, there is a principle of renovation as well as of decay which is at work in all of them. Neither do we suppose them to be invented by the wit of man.

With few exceptions, e.g. technical words or words newly imported from a foreign language, and the like, in which art has imitated nature, 'words are not made but grow.' Nor do we attribute to them a supernatural origin.

The law which regulates them is like the law which governs the circulation of the blood, or the rising of the sap in trees; the action of it is uniform, but the result, which appears in the superficial forms of men and animals or in the leaves of trees, is an endless profusion and variety.

The laws of vegetation are invariable, but no two plants, no two leaves of the forest are precisely the same. The laws of language are invariable, but no two languages are alike, no two words have exactly the same meaning.

No two sounds are exactly of the same quality, or give precisely the same impression.

It would be well if there were a similar consensus about some other points which appear to be still in dispute. Is language conscious or unconscious?

同类推荐
  • 海客论

    海客论

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 马自然金丹口诀

    马自然金丹口诀

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • The Champdoce Mystery

    The Champdoce Mystery

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 大方等无想经

    大方等无想经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 小窗自记

    小窗自记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 刃影人

    刃影人

    我是一个极为普通的人,无目标无理想,过一天是一天,而就在我快被平静的生活所麻木的时候,突然不断涌来的奇怪的事情和一群怪异又特别的人打乱了我的步伐,将我从死水般的生活中拽出,指引我迎向那奇异独特又神秘的未来……
  • 天空旅行者

    天空旅行者

    丹劲、斗气、念力三系修能,不一样的功法体系!超感观打斗场景,不一样的动作创意,保证让你耳目一新!这是一个被浓厚得犹如实质的云层包裹着的世界,这是一个陆地漂浮在空中的世界,这是一个人们生活在空中的世界,这是空居世界。作者是真正的男人,所以本书决不会成为太监!
  • 碎辰记

    碎辰记

    【冷恒】我的人生如一场梦,梦醒人散,断却尘缘,别了世间。你曾说静待我辉煌,到头来,却人非物是。那年,卧看满天云不动,只见雪花纷然,我说在雪地里我们走到白头可好。那年,我笑傲苍天,看人生苍茫,你却不在身旁……
  • 无限之我是玉皇大帝

    无限之我是玉皇大帝

    这是一个无限的故事,看张凌霄如何历经无数位面一步步走上玉皇大帝尊位,威凌万界。暂定无限历程:神话(电影版)——秦时明月——成龙历险记——葫芦娃(雾)——........等。当然还有现实世界打脸装逼的故事。应书友要求,本扑街建了一个裙。。。凌霄天庭:(1)(2)(8)(8)(9)(1)(0)(0)(0)有兴趣的书友就来吧~~~~
  • 女相

    女相

    她一身白衣,英眉冷冽,挥剑指他,他却笑灼颜开。他无赖道:“我昨夜夜观星象,掐指一算,发现你命里缺我。”--情节虚构,请勿模仿
  • 地球的血脉:河流与湖泊(地理知识知道点)

    地球的血脉:河流与湖泊(地理知识知道点)

    地球上有数不清的江河,它们就像是地球的大动脉,日夜奔腾不息。这些大动脉哺育了大地,也孕育了人类文明。从某种意义上来说,人类早期的历史便是一部河流的历史。一条大河可以孕育一个民族、一个国家、一种精神……世界四大文明古国无不是在河流的哺育下成长起来的。因此,人们将江河赞誉为“母亲河”,如中华民族的母亲河是长江和黄河,俄罗斯的母亲河是伏尔加河。
  • 腹黑三小姐太酷炫

    腹黑三小姐太酷炫

    她是异能者,意念一动就可以控制所有的东西,穿越重生到废柴小姐身上后,韬光养晦,扮猪吃虎,收仙兽,炼顶级丹药,受万民敬仰,一国之君在她面前也不敢放肆!天才们,遇到天赋妖孽的她,通通只有仰望的份!
  • 少女升职记

    少女升职记

    无知少女寻找亲人,却意外成为张府女仆,怎么才能解脱呢,在张府会发生什么事情呢......
  • 禁魔僧

    禁魔僧

    一千年的时间里,从西荒魔鬼高原的未知之地,走出了四位圣佛。他们在临死时承认自己是禁魔僧;在一千年后的西荒衢阳城,小乞儿李羽渡在风雪之夜自称禁魔僧出现在西荒修士面前。伊人身影,犹在身畔;禁魔之人,已在天涯。是让灵魂沉陷?还是要悟道天地?禁魔僧之义,在于禁,还是在于魔?抑或是僧?禁魔僧转世者李羽渡心生惘然。
  • 修仙创世录

    修仙创世录

    黄昏的郊外,一只野猫孤独的行走着,看其时而停下脚步,而且行走的姿势也有点怪异。