登陆注册
14812800000052

第52章 IMPEACHMENT REPORTED TO THE SENATE.(11)

And in answer to the eleventh article, this respondent denies that on the 18th day of August, in the year 1866, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, he did, by public speech or otherwise, declare or affirm, in substance or at all, that the thirty-ninth Congress of the United States was not a Congress of the United States authorized by the constitution to exercise legislative power under the same, or that he did then and there declare or affirm that the said thirty-ninth Congress was a Congress of only part of the States in any sense or meaning other than that ten States of the Union were denied representation therein; or that he made any or either of the declarations or affrmations in this behalf, in the said article alleged, as denying or intending to deny that the legislation of said thirty-ninth Congress was valid or obligatory upon this respondent, except so far as this respondent saw fit to approve the same; and as to the allegation in said article, that be did thereby intend or mean to be understood that the said Congress had not power to propose amendments to the Constitution, this respondent says that in said address he said nothing in reference to the subject of amendments of the Constitution. nor was the question of the competency of the said Congress to propose such amendments, without the participation of said excluded States. at the time of said address in any way mentioned or considered or referred to by this respondent. nor in what he did say had he any intent regarding the same, and he denies the allegation so made to the contrary thereof. But this respondent, in further answer to, and in respect of, the said allegations of the said eleventh article hereinbefore traversed and denied, claims and insists upon his personal and official right of freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, and his duty in his political relations as President of the United States to the people of the United States in the exercise of such freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, in the same manner, form and effect as he has in this behalf stated the same in his answer to the said tenth article, and with the same effect as if he here repeated the same; and he further claims and insists, as in said answer to said tenth article he has claimed and insisted, that he is not subject to question, inquisition, impeachment, or inculpation, in any form or manner, of or concerning such rights of freedom of opinion or freedom of speech or his alleged exercise thereof.

And this respondent further denies that on the 21st day of February, in the year 1868, or at any other time, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, in pursuance of any such declaration as is in that behalf in said eleventh article alleged, or otherwise, he did unlawfully, and in disregard of the requirement of the Constitution that he should take care that the laws should be faithfully executed, attempt to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act regulating the tenure of certain civil offices," passed March 2, 1867, by unlawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means by which he should prevent Edwin M. Stanton from forthwith resuming the functions of Secretary for the Department of War, or by lawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1868, and for other purposes,"approved March 2, 1867, or to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States," passed March 2, 1867.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that he has, in his answer to the first article, set forth in detail the acts, steps, and proccedings done and taken by this respondent to and toward or in the matter of the suspension or removal of the said Edwin M. Stanton in or from the office of Secretary for the Department of War, with the times, modes, circumstances, intents, views, purposes, and opinions of official obligation and duty under and with which such acts, steps, and proceedings were done and taken; and he makes answer to this eleventh article of the matters in his answer to the first article, pertaining to the suspension or removal of said Edwin M.

Stanton, to the same intent and effect as if they were here repeated and set forth.

And this deponent, further answering the said eleventh article, denies that by means or reason of anything in said article alleged, this respondent, as President of the United States, did, on the 21st day of February, 1868, or at any other day or time.

commit, or that he was guilty of, a high misdemeanor in office.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that the same and the matters therein contained do not charge or allege the commission of any act whatever by this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, nor the omission by this respondent of any act of official obligation or duty in his office of President of the United States; nor does the said article nor the matters therein contained name designate, describe, or define any act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance, or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance or means, whereby this respondent can know or understand what act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance, or means are imputed to or charged against this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, or intended so to be, or whereby this respondent can more fully or definitely make answer unto the said article than he hereby does.

And this respondent, in submitting to this honorable court this his answer to the articles of impeachment exhibited against him, respectfully reserves leave to amend and add to the same from time to time, as may become necessary or proper, and when and as such necessity and propriety shall appear.

Andrew Johnson Henry Stanbery, B. R. Curtis, Thomas A. R. Nelson, William M.

Evarts. W. S. Groesbeck. Of Counsel.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 伊本丝萝愿托乔木

    伊本丝萝愿托乔木

    本书描绘社会中生活百态,反应娱乐圈现实。以同人手法描写,作品内同人人物均为化名,但聪明的你一定知道我写的是谁。星光熠熠挡不住她复仇的心,她不能再让家人受到伤害!为了还姐姐自由,她义无反顾进入娱乐圈,却遇见了那个他……娱乐圈三年,她复了仇,给家人安全,收获了真爱,却失去了至亲的姐姐……人,不可能什么都拥有……
  • 英雄联盟之乱我为王

    英雄联盟之乱我为王

    一个气候突变的十一月,一间熟悉的网咖,一道熟悉的声影,然而却是一次又一次通往最强王者之路的defeat。如同舞王又一次倒在了S系列赛上,吴皓阳再一次倒在了晋级之路上。不甘,愤怒,绝望......充斥着他的心田,他摔坏了鼠标,敲掉了键盘,砸坏了屏幕,如同一只丧家之犬逃窜向了雨夜。这一逃,却是逃出了一条不一样的道路,一条不亚于最强王者的主宰之路。
  • 暮然成殇

    暮然成殇

    我活得越来越懦弱,你走得越来越远,青春无悔的誓言还可以笑着说多久。
  • 皇叔威武:娶个王爷做媳妇

    皇叔威武:娶个王爷做媳妇

    白落落刚穿越就被追杀,狼狈逃窜,被一个小和尚所救,岂料小和尚竟让她以身相许,留下一句“癞蛤蟆也想吃天鹅肉”,潇洒离去。三年后,他们城门口再相遇,一句“色和尚”让他丢尽脸面,他发誓要让他血债血偿,可是自己的心为什么越来越不受控制。“你跟着我干什么?”白落落气急败坏的低吼道。“你是我媳妇,我当然得跟着你。”某男理直气壮的回答道。“你是个王爷,要点儿脸成吗?”白落落一脸祈求的说道。“这年头,有媳妇就行,还要什么脸啊。”某男欺身上前,深情款款的说道。【情节虚构,请勿模仿】
  • 神兵天下

    神兵天下

    这是武者和神兵横行的世界,强者拥有一切,弱者失去一切。一次欺骗,一次机缘,让秦川拥有了天底下最可怕的神兵之体,从此夺神兵,铸神躯,灭王朝,掳美人,走上一条至高至狂的道路。
  • 秦枫宋雪

    秦枫宋雪

    一桩离奇的灭门惨案,牵出两个亡命少年,他们素不相识,却相敬相惜,在探求真相的过程中,慢慢发现,这个惨案的背后,竟是一个策划多年的阴谋,而这个阴谋的策划者,竟然就是……
  • 英俊王子的故事

    英俊王子的故事

    童话是世界儿童文学中永不凋谢的花冠,是与我们少年儿童捉迷藏的小朋友。童话奠定了我们的人生基础,影响着我们的一生。因此应该把那些名篇珍品传给后代,陶冶后代。
  • 唐步

    唐步

    江山何人可笑略?看尽千山,独步天下。宇内八荒,唯我独尊。我欲三霄揽日月,碧黛可倚令千军。人生在世不过快意一回,谁可伴我,征战九川十泽?
  • 一宠成瘾:竹马你好,我是青梅

    一宠成瘾:竹马你好,我是青梅

    简家有个女儿叫简爱,程家有个儿子叫程晨。五岁的简爱开始耍流氓,十岁的程晨开始闷骚。成年之后的简爱天天想着如何扑倒已成为大BOSS的程晨,而程晨天天想着简爱会如何扑倒他。结婚之后的简爱天天想着如何逃过程晨的晚上运动,而程晨天天想着晚上要换哪种姿势。终于,在某一天简爱彻底爆发了,指着程晨的鼻子说道‘’姓程的,我要跟你离婚,离婚。。。。。
  • 鲁滨逊漂流记

    鲁滨逊漂流记

    《鲁滨逊漂流记》是丹尼尔·笛福于1719年出版的小说。这本书以书信体说理小说,书名人物为主人公的一个虚构了的自传性的故事。小说讲述了一位海难的幸存者鲁滨逊在一个偏僻荒凉的热带小岛-特立尼达拉岛上度过28年的故事,而其伙伴是主人公从食人族手中救下的一个被俘虏的土著人。由于当天是星期五,因而给该土著人命名为“星期五”。在经历了野人、俘虏之后,在岛上以总督自居,成为荒岛的统治者。后协助经过荒岛的英国航船平定叛乱水手,并乘船离开荒岛,返回英国。在进入文明社会后,鲁滨逊依靠巴西种植园的收入成为富翁,并娶妻生子,过起安定的生活。