登陆注册
14730900000060

第60章 The Fallacy of the Young Nation(2)

The ideal which intoxicates least is the very ideal ideal; that sobers us suddenly, as all heights and precipices and great distances do.

Granted that it is a great evil to mistake a cloud for a cape;still, the cloud, which can be most easily mistaken for a cape, is the cloud that is nearest the earth. Similarly, we may grant that it may be dangerous to mistake an ideal for something practical.

But we shall still point out that, in this respect, the most dangerous ideal of all is the ideal which looks a little practical.

It is difficult to attain a high ideal; consequently, it is almost impossible to persuade ourselves that we have attained it.

But it is easy to attain a low ideal; consequently, it is easier still to persuade ourselves that we have attained it when we have done nothing of the kind. To take a random example.

It might be called a high ambition to wish to be an archangel;the man who entertained such an ideal would very possibly exhibit asceticism, or even frenzy, but not, I think, delusion.

He would not think he was an archangel, and go about flapping his hands under the impression that they were wings.

But suppose that a sane man had a low ideal; suppose he wished to be a gentleman. Any one who knows the world knows that in nine weeks he would have persuaded himself that he was a gentleman;and this being manifestly not the case, the result will be very real and practical dislocations and calamities in social life.

It is not the wild ideals which wreck the practical world;it is the tame ideals.

The matter may, perhaps, be illustrated by a parallel from our modern politics. When men tell us that the old Liberal politicians of the type of Gladstone cared only for ideals, of course, they are talking nonsense--they cared for a great many other things, including votes. And when men tell us that modern politicians of the type of Mr. Chamberlain or, in another way, Lord Rosebery, care only for votes or for material interest, then again they are talking nonsense--these men care for ideals like all other men.

But the real distinction which may be drawn is this, that to the older politician the ideal was an ideal, and nothing else.

To the new politician his dream is not only a good dream, it is a reality.

The old politician would have said, "It would be a good thing if there were a Republican Federation dominating the world."But the modern politician does not say, "It would be a good thing if there were a British Imperialism dominating the world."He says, "It is a good thing that there is a British Imperialism dominating the world;" whereas clearly there is nothing of the kind.

The old Liberal would say "There ought to be a good Irish government in Ireland." But the ordinary modern Unionist does not say, "There ought to be a good English government in Ireland." He says, "There is a good English government in Ireland;" which is absurd.

In short, the modern politicians seem to think that a man becomes practical merely by making assertions entirely about practical things.

Apparently, a delusion does not matter as long as it is a materialistic delusion. Instinctively most of us feel that, as a practical matter, even the contrary is true. I certainly would much rather share my apartments with a gentleman who thought he was God than with a gentleman who thought he was a grasshopper.

To be continually haunted by practical images and practical problems, to be constantly thinking of things as actual, as urgent, as in process of completion--these things do not prove a man to be practical;these things, indeed, are among the most ordinary signs of a lunatic.

That our modern statesmen are materialistic is nothing against their being also morbid. Seeing angels in a vision may make a man a supernaturalist to excess. But merely seeing snakes in delirium tremens does not make him a naturalist.

And when we come actually to examine the main stock notions of our modern practical politicians, we find that those main stock notions are mainly delusions. A great many instances might be given of the fact.

We might take, for example, the case of that strange class of notions which underlie the word "union," and all the eulogies heaped upon it.

Of course, union is no more a good thing in itself than separation is a good thing in itself. To have a party in favour of union and a party in favour of separation is as absurd as to have a party in favour of going upstairs and a party in favour of going downstairs.

The question is not whether we go up or down stairs, but where we are going to, and what we are going, for? Union is strength;union is also weakness. It is a good thing to harness two horses to a cart; but it is not a good thing to try and turn two hansom cabs into one four-wheeler. Turning ten nations into one empire may happen to be as feasible as turning ten shillings into one half-sovereign.

Also it may happen to be as preposterous as turning ten terriers into one mastiff . The question in all cases is not a question of union or absence of union, but of identity or absence of identity.

Owing to certain historical and moral causes, two nations may be so united as upon the whole to help each other. Thus England and Scotland pass their time in paying each other compliments;but their energies and atmospheres run distinct and parallel, and consequently do not clash. Scotland continues to be educated and Calvinistic; England continues to be uneducated and happy.

But owing to certain other Moral and certain other political causes, two nations may be so united as only to hamper each other;their lines do clash and do not run parallel. Thus, for instance, England and Ireland are so united that the Irish can sometimes rule England, but can never rule Ireland.

The educational systems, including the last Education Act, are here, as in the case of Scotland, a very good test of the matter.

The overwhelming majority of Irishmen believe in a strict Catholicism;the overwhelming majority of Englishmen believe in a vague Protestantism.

同类推荐
  • Michael

    Michael

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 佛说圣持世陀罗尼经

    佛说圣持世陀罗尼经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 东南纪事

    东南纪事

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 郑氏史料三编

    郑氏史料三编

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 始终心要注

    始终心要注

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 我的丈夫是只男鬼

    我的丈夫是只男鬼

    我天生异瞳,生下来是父母便失踪了。我的双眼能见鬼,身上阴气重,于是以阴镇阴,举行冥婚,嫁给了一只男鬼....
  • 恶魔校草:妖娆女王快躺好

    恶魔校草:妖娆女王快躺好

    她是一个乡下来的小姑娘,衣着朴素,心地善良。他是高高在上的校草,风流倜傥,玩世不恭。在她身边上演了一场王子与灰姑娘的真实故事。五年后,她坐在高级写字楼里,语言精炼,淡妆盘发,与他幸福相拥。【PS:作者文笔不好,虐文不擅长,喜虐的宝宝可以提出建议,我会尽量写虐,谢谢。】
  • 学园之一方通行

    学园之一方通行

    一方通行在经过魔禁22卷以后,被神秘的天使给杀死。在经过一个神秘的空间,再次复活到魔禁最开始的时间中的故事。再次化身为恶又怎么样?只要能保护珍重之物,无论多么卑鄙,多么邪恶,甚至没有人性又怎样?无论怎么样地代价本大爷都不怕付出,只要能保护那个孩子。_________by一方通行PS:作者君,乃无节操之人。周更、月更、以及年更都有可能。绝不TJ,务必不要期待。
  • 老妃来欺:皇上请吃药

    老妃来欺:皇上请吃药

    一次莫名的穿越任务,一串来历不明的珠石手串,缺心眼杀手居然灰头土脸变身王府二小姐,是福还是祸?盼着早日完成任务回归现代拿提成玩男人,却被人打包送给了小鲜肉天子为妃!老牛吃嫩草,一口都不少,只恨一失足沦为天下笑柄,老妃来欺,从此后宫不太平。-------司徒月的穿越日记
  • 隐士传说

    隐士传说

    隐士的守护者,为了人类暗中降妖除魔守护凡间。不老不死的殷天行曾经参与到历史中,如今却混迹于市井,应对着断绝神魔的世界。老的对手、新的妖魔、轮回几世的爱人、触及禁忌的科学......作为守护者,殷天行继续着自己的战斗!无论是华夏还是西方,众多的神秘在本书中一一展现,一个不为人知的历史.........
  • 万源之祖

    万源之祖

    且看少年如何在异界天骄中崭露头角终成万源之祖
  • 青春再一天

    青春再一天

    很多我们以为一辈子都不会忘记的事情,就在我们念念不忘的日子里,被我们遗忘了。【这事一些唯美的青春小故事】
  • 灵魂契琴

    灵魂契琴

    我的基友非人类,有点甜又有点虐!意外身亡的吐槽外星人,被面瘫大帅比捡回家的故事,我们不是BL,我们只是搞基搬运工
  • 龙血特种兵

    龙血特种兵

    一个个你不敢相信的真相接踵而至,一个个神秘事件被揭开面纱,神秘的“玄黄”组织从秦皇一统六国传承至今,融合了八柄神剑才铸成的黄龙大印究竟有何真意,黄龙守护者真正的使命到底又是什么.......一切尽在《龙血特种兵》之中,让我们跟着9527的脚步,一起来冒险吧!
  • 剑决天下

    剑决天下

    这是一个只有剑士的世界!这是一个充满动荡的世界!执剑天涯,梦舞星辰,君见红尘,大梦初醒。四合八荒,唯我独尊;五天九界,独步宇内。君子执剑,谁与我共争锋?剑决天下,谁敢阻我前路?