登陆注册
14730900000052

第52章 On Mr. McCabe and a Divine Frivolity(1)

A critic once remonstrated with me saying, with an air of indignant reasonableness, "If you must make jokes, at least you need not make them on such serious subjects." I replied with a natural simplicity and wonder, "About what other subjects can one make jokes except serious subjects?" It is quite useless to talk about profane jesting. All jesting is in its nature profane, in the sense that it must be the sudden realization that something which thinks itself solemn is not so very solemn after all.

If a joke is not a joke about religion or morals, it is a joke about police-magistrates or scientific professors or undergraduates dressed up as Queen Victoria. And people joke about the police-magistrate more than they joke about the Pope, not because the police-magistrate is a more frivolous subject, but, on the contrary, because the police-magistrate is a more serious subject than the Pope.

The Bishop of Rome has no jurisdiction in this realm of England;whereas the police-magistrate may bring his solemnity to bear quite suddenly upon us. Men make jokes about old scientific professors, even more than they make them about bishops--not because science is lighter than religion, but because science is always by its nature more solemn and austere than religion. It is not I;it is not even a particular class of journalists or jesters who make jokes about the matters which are of most awful import;it is the whole human race. If there is one thing more than another which any one will admit who has the smallest knowledge of the world, it is that men are always speaking gravely and earnestly and with the utmost possible care about the things that are not important, but always talking frivolously about the things that are.

Men talk for hours with the faces of a college of cardinals about things like golf, or tobacco, or waistcoats, or party politics.

But all the most grave and dreadful things in the world are the oldest jokes in the world--being married; being hanged.

One gentleman, however, Mr. McCabe, has in this matter made to me something that almost amounts to a personal appeal;and as he happens to be a man for whose sincerity and intellectual virtue I have a high respect, I do not feel inclined to let it pass without some attempt to satisfy my critic in the matter.

Mr. McCabe devotes a considerable part of the last essay in the collection called "Christianity and Rationalism on Trial"to an objection, not to my thesis, but to my method, and a very friendly and dignified appeal to me to alter it. I am much inclined to defend myself in this matter out of mere respect for Mr. McCabe, and still more so out of mere respect for the truth which is, I think, in danger by his error, not only in this question, but in others.

In order that there may be no injustice done in the matter, I will quote Mr. McCabe himself. "But before I follow Mr. Chesterton in some detail I would make a general observation on his method.

He is as serious as I am in his ultimate purpose, and I respect him for that. He knows, as I do, that humanity stands at a solemn parting of the ways. Towards some unknown goal it presses through the ages, impelled by an overmastering desire of happiness.

To-day it hesitates, lightheartedly enough, but every serious thinker knows how momentous the decision may be. It is, apparently, deserting the path of religion and entering upon the path of secularism.

Will it lose itself in quagmires of sensuality down this new path, and pant and toil through years of civic and industrial anarchy, only to learn it had lost the road, and must return to religion?

Or will it find that at last it is leaving the mists and the quagmires behind it; that it is ascending the slope of the hill so long dimly discerned ahead, and making straight for the long-sought Utopia?

This is the drama of our time, and every man and every woman should understand it.

"Mr. Chesterton understands it. Further, he gives us credit for understanding it. He has nothing of that paltry meanness or strange density of so many of his colleagues, who put us down as aimless iconoclasts or moral anarchists.

He admits that we are waging a thankless war for what we take to be Truth and Progress. He is doing the same.

But why, in the name of all that is reasonable, should we, when we are agreed on the momentousness of the issue either way, forthwith desert serious methods of conducting the controversy?

Why, when the vital need of our time is to induce men and women to collect their thoughts occasionally, and be men and women--nay, to remember that they are really gods that hold the destinies of humanity on their knees--why should we think that this kaleidoscopic play of phrases is inopportune?

The ballets of the Alhambra, and the fireworks of the Crystal Palace, and Mr. Chesterton's Daily News articles, have their place in life.

But how a serious social student can think of curing the thoughtlessness of our generation by strained paradoxes; of giving people a sane grasp of social problems by literary sleight-of-hand;of settling important questions by a reckless shower of rocket-metaphors and inaccurate `facts,' and the substitution of imagination for judgment, I cannot see."I quote this passage with a particular pleasure, because Mr. McCabe certainly cannot put too strongly the degree to which I give him and his school credit for their complete sincerity and responsibility of philosophical attitude. I am quite certain that they mean every word they say. I also mean every word I say. But why is it that Mr. McCabe has some sort of mysterious hesitation about admitting that I mean every word I say; why is it that he is not quite as certain of my mental responsibility as I am of his mental responsibility?

If we attempt to answer the question directly and well, we shall, I think, have come to the root of the matter by the shortest cut.

Mr. McCabe thinks that I am not serious but only funny, because Mr. McCabe thinks that funny is the opposite of serious.

Funny is the opposite of not funny, and of nothing else.

同类推荐
  • 谈渊

    谈渊

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 华严经文义记

    华严经文义记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 排调

    排调

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 延寿命经

    延寿命经

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • The Point of View

    The Point of View

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 当火影晓穿越到海贼

    当火影晓穿越到海贼

    轻小说,不压抑,不虐人,不悲伤,略轻浮,恶搞文。若是有剧情显得崩坏,不要在意这些细节。
  • 幻想沙漠

    幻想沙漠

    我很早以前就开始喜欢古诗了,不过这里的诗会不一样,可能不局限于中国的诗吧~内容,因为诗人地域的不同,情感也会不同吧。所以,一段异旅。所以。
  • 命定轮回传

    命定轮回传

    童真无邪与世无争,大道之花成仙之路,历经万古人族无敌,万万年回首无人伴,闯过黄泉夺魂取魄,自创轮回铸就世界,再回首,这一生,这一世,原来一切因果皆是自己造成,
  • 伶俜录

    伶俜录

    一场天降洪灾过后,南宁荣家祖墓内多出一副红漆木棺,内有一名身着红嫁衣的女子……20日早晨此女子被人认出是城东卫家千金卫允川。竟是如何辗转?宋恒姝发现一切远远超出自己的想象,更无法控制。如何颠覆这场迷局?看南北倒斗世家分分合合,闻三尺红台上戏子诉歌。问君可记当年战鼓急,将军傲骨终究葬入坟冢。如此说来,怕是早已看破红尘连理,又为何念那牡丹一曲?“人在荆棘中,不动不刺。心在俗世中,不动不伤。”当年的战火纷飞,徒留一室伤悲。君不见高堂明镜悲白发,荒冢新坟葬浮华。“他日云端如相见,请君江南扫落花。”
  • 恶魔契约:霸道校草的傻丫头

    恶魔契约:霸道校草的傻丫头

    不是吧!可耐的糖果遛个狗也能被强吻,还有更逆天的事情吗?回到家后爸爸妈妈尽然还要把自己“送”给别人,糖果也是觉得生无可恋了······直到有一天恶魔来找糖果签一份契约,从此,可耐的糖果被这位恶魔缠身······
  • 福妻驾到

    福妻驾到

    现代饭店彪悍老板娘魂穿古代。不分是非的极品婆婆?三年未归生死不明的丈夫?心狠手辣的阴毒亲戚?贪婪而好色的地主老财?吃上顿没下顿的贫困宭境?不怕不怕,神仙相助,一技在手,天下我有!且看现代张悦娘,如何身带福气玩转古代,开面馆、收小弟、左纳财富,右傍美男,共绘幸福生活大好蓝图!!!!快本新书《天媒地聘》已经上架开始销售,只要3.99元即可将整本书抱回家,你还等什么哪,赶紧点击下面的直通车,享受乐乐精心为您准备的美食盛宴吧!)
  • 蜀山战纪之隐玉情

    蜀山战纪之隐玉情

    本小说分为多卷书,每一卷讲述不同的银杏夫妇的爱情故事。第一卷为:主讲蜀山后续。第二卷:主讲玉无心穿越后的故事。第三卷:主讲将花千骨的故事代入蜀山的故事之中。
  • 天地之狱

    天地之狱

    神魔降临,世界大变,然而在人们认为一切都在向好处发展时,一个人带来了灾难的预告。暗流涌动,整个大陆就如同一个监牢将一切都笼罩在其中,没有任何人能够脱身,命运的轮转永不停息,一切都走在既定的轨道之上,没有人能够挣脱,即便是那带来灾难的神魔。
  • 血字研究(语文新课标课外必读第十三辑)

    血字研究(语文新课标课外必读第十三辑)

    国家教育部颁布了最新《语文课程标准》,统称新课标,对中、小学语文教学指定了阅读书目,对阅读的数量、内容、质量以及速度都提出了明确的要求,这对于提高学生的阅读能力,培养语文素养,陶冶情操,促进学生终身学习和终身可持续发展,对于提高广大人民的文学素养具有极大的意义。
  • 复仇公主:你爱不起

    复仇公主:你爱不起

    她——冷若冰霜他——冰山一座她——温婉可人他——温柔王子她——鬼马精灵他——花心大少当他碰上她会有什么样的火花?