登陆注册
14730900000017

第17章 Mr. H. G. Wells and the Giants(3)

And humanity ought to be told to be recklessness itself.

For all the fundamental functions of a healthy man ought emphatically to be performed with pleasure and for pleasure; they emphatically ought not to be performed with precaution or for precaution.

A man ought to eat because he has a good appetite to satisfy, and emphatically not because he has a body to sustain. A man ought to take exercise not because he is too fat, but because he loves foils or horses or high mountains, and loves them for their own sake.

And a man ought to marry because he has fallen in love, and emphatically not because the world requires to be populated.

The food will really renovate his tissues as long as he is not thinking about his tissues. The exercise will really get him into training so long as he is thinking about something else. And the marriage will really stand some chance of producing a generous-blooded generation if it had its origin in its own natural and generous excitement.

It is the first law of health that our necessities should not be accepted as necessities; they should be accepted as luxuries.

Let us, then, be careful about the small things, such as a scratch or a slight illness, or anything that can be managed with care.

But in the name of all sanity, let us be careless about the important things, such as marriage, or the fountain of our very life will fail.

Mr. Wells, however, is not quite clear enough of the narrower scientific outlook to see that there are some things which actually ought not to be scientific. He is still slightly affected with the great scientific fallacy; I mean the habit of beginning not with the human soul, which is the first thing a man learns about, but with some such thing as protoplasm, which is about the last.

The one defect in his splendid mental equipment is that he does not sufficiently allow for the stuff or material of men.

In his new Utopia he says, for instance, that a chief point of the Utopia will be a disbelief in original sin. If he had begun with the human soul--that is, if he had begun on himself--he would have found original sin almost the first thing to be believed in.

He would have found, to put the matter shortly, that a permanent possibility of selfishness arises from the mere fact of having a self, and not from any accidents of education or ill-treatment. And the weakness of all Utopias is this, that they take the greatest difficulty of man and assume it to be overcome, and then give an elaborate account of the overcoming of the smaller ones.

They first assume that no man will want more than his share, and then are very ingenious in explaining whether his share will be delivered by motor-car or balloon. And an even stronger example of Mr. Wells's indifference to the human psychology can be found in his cosmopolitanism, the abolition in his Utopia of all patriotic boundaries. He says in his innocent way that Utopia must be a world-state, or else people might make war on it.

It does not seem to occur to him that, for a good many of us, if it were a world-state we should still make war on it to the end of the world.

For if we admit that there must be varieties in art or opinion what sense is there in thinking there will not be varieties in government?

The fact is very simple. Unless you are going deliberately to prevent a thing being good, you cannot prevent it being worth fighting for.

It is impossible to prevent a possible conflict of civilizations, because it is impossible to prevent a possible conflict between ideals.

If there were no longer our modern strife between nations, there would only be a strife between Utopias. For the highest thing does not tend to union only; the highest thing, tends also to differentiation.

You can often get men to fight for the union; but you can never prevent them from fighting also for the differentiation.

This variety in the highest thing is the meaning of the fierce patriotism, the fierce nationalism of the great European civilization.

It is also, incidentally, the meaning of the doctrine of the Trinity.

But I think the main mistake of Mr. Wells's philosophy is a somewhat deeper one, one that he expresses in a very entertaining manner in the introductory part of the new Utopia. His philosophy in some sense amounts to a denial of the possibility of philosophy itself.

At least, he maintains that there are no secure and reliable ideas upon which we can rest with a final mental satisfaction.

It will be both clearer, however, and more amusing to quote Mr. Wells himself.

He says, "Nothing endures, nothing is precise and certain (except the mind of a pedant). . . . Being indeed!--there is no being, but a universal becoming of individualities, and Plato turned his back on truth when he turned towards his museum of specific ideals."Mr. Wells says, again, "There is no abiding thing in what we know.

We change from weaker to stronger lights, and each more powerful light pierces our hitherto opaque foundations and reveals fresh and different opacities below." Now, when Mr. Wells says things like this, I speak with all respect when I say that he does not observe an evident mental distinction.

It cannot be true that there is nothing abiding in what we know.

For if that were so we should not know it all and should not call it knowledge. Our mental state may be very different from that of somebody else some thousands of years back; but it cannot be entirely different, or else we should not be conscious of a difference.

Mr. Wells must surely realize the first and simplest of the paradoxes that sit by the springs of truth. He must surely see that the fact of two things being different implies that they are similar.

The hare and the tortoise may differ in the quality of swiftness, but they must agree in the quality of motion. The swiftest hare cannot be swifter than an isosceles triangle or the idea of pinkness.

When we say the hare moves faster, we say that the tortoise moves.

And when we say of a thing that it moves, we say, without need of other words, that there are things that do not move.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 英雄联盟之我定封神

    英雄联盟之我定封神

    楚然,一名刚刚毕业的大专生,由于性格内向,面试了两百多家用人单位,无一成功,最后,在好朋友林浩的指引下,走上了电竞这条道路······
  • 九界之殇

    九界之殇

    现在的世界为什么没有神仙妖怪,上古大战遗孤身在何方,天地有变,浩劫是否重来,恩怨情仇再次演绎
  • 予你皇冠

    予你皇冠

    有女人的地方就有战争,什么地方的女人最多?从前是后宫,现在则是高校。高校里藏着各式各样的女生,她们有各自的小团体,以独特的眼光判断对错,思想尖锐,善于做任何事件的审判者。而最优秀的男生是王。
  • 九世的轮回

    九世的轮回

    经历九世的轮回只为一飞冲天,作为一个小人物他经历了八世的轮回,这第九世就是他翻身的契机,这是他最后的机会,也是他们最后的一次机会。美女、朋友、灵兽和我一起站在世界的顶点吧,异族的小崽子们我会将你们踩在脚下的。
  • 斗罗大陆之千变

    斗罗大陆之千变

    ,一个属于武魂的世界,名叫斗罗大陆。这里没有魔法,没有斗气,没有武术,却有神奇的武魂。这里的每个人,都会在武魂殿中令武魂觉醒。武魂有动物,有植物,有器物,武魂可以辅助人们的日常生活。而其中一些特别出色的武却可以用来修炼并进行战斗,这个职业,是斗罗大陆上最为强大也是最荣耀的职业——魂师!完全复制
  • 明明很爱你之生死别

    明明很爱你之生死别

    情缘初结,心声且寄,执手相牵若素。朝朝暮暮待重逢,谁料是,隔山水阻。伊心婀娜,君情缱绻,犹盼闾门归路。金风玉露又经年,依旧是,孑身独伫。因高考成绩的差异而暂时离别的恋人,一年之后,他终于来到了她所在的大学。分隔一年之久的再次相见,又将是一种怎样的境遇呢?明明很爱你却不能说出;明明很爱你却不得不与你离别。原谅我吧,再也不能陪你一起看日出、日落了…….(新文《妖道人途》已经上传了,希望感兴趣的朋友去瞅瞅嘛)
  • 无色的羽毛之天降

    无色的羽毛之天降

    我是陈天赫,是一个生活平常世界里的普通人,过着自由自在的生活,没有奢求过什么,只希望能平平淡淡的活着,以和平为第一。而就在这一天,一位神秘的女子从天而降和我相遇,后来我发现她竟然是个天使。因为她失忆了,我就暂时收留了她,但渐渐地她融入了我的生活,就此我的人生发生了惊天动地的改变。不为人知的秘密,潜藏在我身边的种种危机,都慢慢地涌现出来……
  • 末世斩天诀

    末世斩天诀

    灾变四起,末世来临,这一切缘于何故?失忆少年,拥有巨剑,只有蛮力。萌萌采药少女,御姐女少庄主,顽皮小萝莉悉数出场,会同失忆少年,能否阻止末日到来?
  • 超时空清洁工

    超时空清洁工

    方迹是一名清洁工,但是他和大家在大街上看见的那些穿着黄马甲的清洁工们有些不一样...“外来者,鉴于你已违反时空安全法第342条,我代表本土监管势力拘捕你,你将有以下两种选择....”
  • 被封印的圣剑

    被封印的圣剑

    冰霜大陆、封印大陆、元素大陆原本为一体的大陆在灵魂冲击过后,世界碎裂了,碎裂成了现在的样子崩溃的大陆虽然已经被分裂,但是随大陆漂移的人们并没有因此而停止争斗。散落在大陆上的武器们成为了争夺的主要目标。这些充满力量的武器都拥有自己独特的能力,有些甚至是唯一的强大的;失落之剑“永恒的力量”就是其中之一;除此之外特殊能力的佩饰等也是充满神秘的诱惑着所有大陆的冒险者们。