登陆注册
14723100000166

第166章

Adam Smith's retrogression [36] in the analysis of the process of reproduction is so much the more remarkable because he not only elaborates upon Quesnay's correct analyses, generalising his " avances primitives " and " avances annuelles " for instance and calling them respectively "fixed" and "circulating" capital [37] , but even relapses in spots entirely into physiocratic errors. For instance in order to demonstrate that the farmer produces more value than any other sort of capitalist, he says: "No equal capital puts into motion a greater quantity of productive labour than that of the farmer. Not only his labouring servants, but his labouring cattle are productive labourers." (Fine compliment for the labouring servants!) "In agriculture too nature labours along with man; and though her labour costs no expense , its produce has its value, as well as that of the most expensive workmen . The most important operations of agriculture seem intended not so much to increase, though they do that too, as to direct the fertility of nature towards the production of the plants most profitable to man. A field overgrown with briars and brambles may frequently produce as great a quantity of vegetables as the best cultivated vineyard or corn field. Planting and tillage frequently regulate more than they animate the active fertility of nature; and after all their labour, a great part of the work always remains to be done by her. The labourers and labouring cattle ( sic !), therefore, employed in agriculture, not only occasion, like the workmen in manufactures, the reproduction of a value equal to their own consumption, or to the capital which employs them, together with its owners' profits; but of a much greater value. Over and above the capital of the farmer and all its profits, they regularly occasion the reproduction of the rent of the landlord. This rent may be considered as the produce of those powers of nature the use of which the landlord lends to the farmer. It is greater or smaller according to the supposed extent of those powers, or, in other words, according to the supposed natural or improved fertility of the land. It is the work of nature which remains after deducting or compensating everything which can be regarded as the work of man. It is seldom less than a fourth, and frequently more than a third of the whole produce. No equal quantity of productive labour employed in manufactures can ever occasion so great a reproduction. In them nature does nothing; man does all; and the reproduction must always be in proportion to the strength of the agents that occasion it. The capital employed in agriculture, therefore, not only puts into motion a greater quantity of productive labour than any equal capital employed in manufactures, but in proportion too to the quantity of productive labour which it employs, it adds a much greater value to the annual produce of the land and labour of the country, to the real wealth and revenue of its inhabitants." (Book II, Ch. 5, p. 242.)Adam Smith says in Book II, Ch. 1: "The whole value of the seed, too, is properly a fixed capital." Here, then, capital equals capital-value;it exists in a "fixed" form. "Though it (the seed) goes backwards and forwards between the ground and the granary, it never changes masters, and therefore does not properly circulate. The farmer makes his profit, not by its sale, but by its increase." (P. 186.) The absurdity of the thing lies here in the fact that Smith does not, like Quesnay before him, see the re-appearance of the value of constant capital in a renewed form, and hence fails to see an important element of the process of reproduction, but merely offers one more illustration, and a wrong one at that, of his distinctions between circulating and fixed capital. In Smith's translation of " avances primitives "and " avances annuelles " as "fixed capital" and "circulating capital,"the progress consists in the term "capital," the concept of which is generalised, and becomes independent of the special consideration for the "agricultural"sphere of application of the physiocrats; the retrogression consists in the fact that "fixed" and "circulating" are regarded as the overriding distinction, and are so maintained.

同类推荐
  • 时古对类

    时古对类

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 风月梦

    风月梦

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 经济文集

    经济文集

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • Of Taxes

    Of Taxes

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 笠翁对韵

    笠翁对韵

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 英雄联盟的幻想

    英雄联盟的幻想

    一个男银穿越到英雄联盟的故事,为你展现一个属于我们自己的英雄联盟。本人新人!多多关照。口胡啊!不会写简介啊。
  • 剑如红颜

    剑如红颜

    初次见面时的怦然心动亦如转身离开时的心如死灰般强烈。爱,像一把利剑,可以杀敌,亦可以伤己!
  • 一个交易

    一个交易

    来做个交易吧,许下你的愿望,让我来实现它,拿出你的宝物,交易只有一次。
  • 玉阶怨

    玉阶怨

    仙月穿越大唐与诗仙李白的爱情故事。前世,我为青莲,你为梵音,一眸擦肩,惊艳了一千年的时光。是谁的深情绚烂了三生石上的一见倾心?从此,我就在我写的唐诗里痴痴的等,我知道,你是我今生最美的相遇,纵隔了天涯海角的距离,一言相识,仿若倾心已久。我说,你的温柔丰盈了我的传奇;你说,愿得一人心,白首不相离。于万千的人群中,于无际涯的时光里,没有人知道,这世界上,究竟有多少情,属于默然相伴,寂静欢喜。都,只为了你。今生,我为李白,你为仙月,清风为歌,温柔了我的眉弯。是谁的呼唤柔婉了谁的一帘幽梦?
  • 火域魔尊

    火域魔尊

    天空漆黑如夜,伸手不见五指,一粒粒如黄豆般大小的雨滴从那无尽的苍穹之巅跌落,肆无忌惮地敲打着地面,华夏文明古国Wx市的上空,一道光亮划破天际,夜空中一个黑洞突然出现,仿佛要把周遭吞噬一空,同时在那遥远的天际,时间裂缝在电闪雷鸣的夜空中被映射的忽隐忽现,在电光的交错变换之间,彷佛能看到时间裂缝里那一个个交错却互不干扰的时空投影,又是轰的一声雷鸣,一条神秘的光影瞬间从黑洞中呼啸而出,紧接着只听见一声声凄厉的惨叫声响彻整个天际……火域魔尊读者①群:78472057
  • 只想守住那丝纯洁

    只想守住那丝纯洁

    为什么?为什么我付出了那么多,伤害了我最爱的人,失去一切只为换回那个残暴的男人。几年后,她释然了,也决定做回那个快乐的施小然。青春的错误要用余生来交换,难道这就是她的宿命吗?
  • 偶滴开心日记

    偶滴开心日记

    偶是小果,这是偶滴开心日记。偶虽然学习好,但也有调皮的时候。说起我的事,100天也说不完!就从今天开始,一天一章,请大家多多支持哈!
  • Crotchet Castle

    Crotchet Castle

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 相思谋:妃常难娶

    相思谋:妃常难娶

    某日某王府张灯结彩,婚礼进行时,突然不知从哪冒出来一个小孩,对着新郎道:“爹爹,今天您的大婚之喜,娘亲让我来还一样东西。”说完提着手中的玉佩在新郎面前晃悠。此话一出,一府宾客哗然,然当大家看清这小孩与新郎如一个模子刻出来的面容时,顿时石化。此时某屋顶,一个绝色女子不耐烦的声音响起:“儿子,事情办完了我们走,别在那磨矶,耽误时间。”新郎一看屋顶上的女子,当下怒火攻心,扔下新娘就往女子所在的方向扑去,吼道:“女人,你给本王站住。”一场爱与被爱的追逐正式开始、、、、、、、
  • 信仰久名

    信仰久名

    第一世,他在一千三百年前的唐朝,他叫完颜清风,他的结局是,痛失爱人,孤独而终....第二世,他在21世纪,他叫银清风,他的结局是,众叛亲离,愤恨而亡.......