When he returned to Chastelar，the people came out to stare at him as at a curiosity，all along the road.
At the priest's house in Chastelar he rejoined Mademoiselle Baptistine and Madame Magloire，who were waiting for him，and he said to his sister：
'Well！was I in the right？
The poor priest went to his poor mountaineers with empty hands，and he returns from them with his hands full.I set out bearing only my faith in God；I have brought back the treasure of a cathedral.'
That evening，before he went to bed，he said again：
'Let us never fear robbers nor murderers.
Those are dangers from without，petty dangers.
Let us fear ourselves.
Prejudices are the real robbers；vices are the real murderers.
The great dangers lie within ourselves.What matters it what threatens our head or our purse！
Let us think only of that which threatens our soul.'
Then，turning to his sister：
'Sister，never a precaution on the part of the priest，against his fellow-man.That which his fellow does，God permits.
Let us confine ourselves to prayer，when we think that a danger is approaching us.
Let us pray，not for ourselves，but that our brother may not fall into sin on our account.'
However，such incidents were rare in his life.
We relate those of which we know；but generally he passed his life in doing the same things at the same moment.
One month of his year resembled one hour of his day.
As to what became of'the treasure'of the cathedral of Embrun，we should be embarrassed by any inquiry in that direction.It consisted of very handsome things，very tempting things，and things which were very well adapted to be stolen for the benefit of the unfortunate.
Stolen they had already been elsewhere.Half of the adventure was completed；it only remained to impart a new direction to the theft，and to cause it to take a short trip in the direction of the poor.
However，we make no assertions on this point.
Only，a rather obscure note was found among the Bishop's papers，which may bear some relation to this matter，and which is couched in these terms，'The question is，to decide whether this should be turned over to the cathedral or to the hospital.'
Ⅷ PHILOSOPHY AFTER DRINKING
The senator above mentioned was a clever man，who had made his own way，heedless of those things which present obstacles，and which are called conscience，sworn faith，justice，duty：
he had marched straight to his goal，without once flinching in the line of his advancement and his interest.
He was an old attorney，softened by success；not a bad man by any means，who rendered all the small services in his power to his sons，his sons-in-law，his relations，and even to his friends，having wisely seized upon，in life，good sides，good opportunities，good windfalls.Everything else seemed to him very stupid.
He was intelligent，and just sufficiently educated to think himself a disciple of Epicurus；while he was，in reality，only a product of Pigault-Lebrun.He laughed willingly and pleasantly over infinite and eternal things，and at the'Crotchets of that good old fellow the Bishop.'He even sometimes laughed at him with an amiable authority in the presence of M.Myriel himself，who listened to him.
On some semi-official occasion or other，I do not recollect what，Count***[this senator]and M.Myriel were to dine with the prefect.At dessert，the senator，who was slightly exhilarated，though still perfectly dignified，exclaimed：——
'Egad，Bishop，let's have a discussion.
It is hard for a senator and a bishop to look at each other without winking.
We are two augurs.I am going to make a confession to you.
I have a philosophy of my own.'
'And you are right，'replied the Bishop.
'As one makes one's philosophy，so one lies on it.
You are on the bed of purple，senator.'
The senator was encouraged，and went on：——
'Let us be good fellows.'
'Good devils even，'said the Bishop.
'I declare to you，'continued the senator，'that the Marquis d'Argens，Pyrrhon，Hobbes，and M.Naigeon are no rascals.I have all the philosophers in my library gilded on the edges.'
'Like yourself，Count，'interposed the Bishop.
The senator resumed：——
I hate Diderot；he is an ideologist，a declaimer，and a revolutionist，a believer in God at bottom，and more bigoted than Voltaire.Voltaire made sport of Needham，and he was wrong，for Needham's eels prove that God is useless.
A drop of vinegar in a spoonful of flour paste supplies the fiat lux.
Suppose the drop to be larger and the spoonful bigger；you have the world.
Man is the eel.Then what is the good of the Eternal Father？
The Jehovah hypothesis tires me，Bishop.
It is good for nothing but to produce shallow people，whose reasoning is hollow.
Down with that great All，which torments me！Hurrah for Zero which leaves me in peace！
Between you and me，and in order to empty my sack，and make confession to my pastor，as it behooves me to do，I will admit to you that I have good sense.I am not enthusiastic over your Jesus，who preaches renunciation and sacrifice to the last extremity.
'Tis the counsel of an avaricious man to beggars.
Renunciation；why？
Sacrifice；to what end？I do not see one wolf immolating himself for the happiness of another wolf.
Let us stick to nature，then.
We are at the top；let us have a superior philosophy.
What is the advantage of being at the top，if one sees no further than the end of other people's noses？
Let us live merrily.
Life is all.
That man has another future elsewhere，on high，below，anywhere，I don't believe；not one single word of it.
Ah！sacrifice and renunciation are recommended to me；I must take heed to everything I do；I must cudgel my brains over good and evil，over the just and the unjust，over the fas and the nefas.
Why？
Because I shall have to render an account of my actions.
When？
After death.
What a fine dream！After my death it will be a very clever person who can catch me.Have a handful of dust seized by a shadow-hand，if you can.Let us tell the truth，we who are initiated，and who have raised the veil of Isis：
