登陆注册
15709400000259

第259章

The principle is, that either at the beginning, or ultimately, such questions shall or may be decided by the national tribunals. If in any suit properly cognizable in a State court the decision should turn on a clause in the Constitution, or on a law of the United States, or on the act of a national offense, or on the validity of a national act, an appeal lies to the Supreme Court of the United States and to its officers. The object has been to give to the national tribunals of the nation full cognizance of its own laws, treaties, and congressional acts.

The judges of all the national tribunals, of whatever grade or rank, hold their offices for life, and are removable only on impeachment.

They are not even removable on an address of Congress; thus holding on a firmer tenure even than our own judges, who may, I believe, be moved on an address by Parliament. The judges in America are not entitled to any pension or retiring allowances; and as there is not, as regards the judges of the national courts, any proviso that they shall cease to sit after a certain age, they are in fact immovable whatever may be their infirmities. Their position in this respect is not good, seeing that their salaries will hardly admit of their making adequate provision for the evening of life. The salary of the Chief Justice of the United States is only 1300l. per annum.

All judges of the national courts, of whatever rank, are appointed by the President, but their appointments must be confirmed by the Senate. This proviso, however, gives to the Senate practically but little power, and is rarely used in opposition to the will of the President. If the President name one candidate, who on political grounds is distasteful to a majority of the Senate, it is not probable that a second nomination made by him will be more satisfactory. This seems now to be understood, and the nomination of the cabinet ministers and of the judges, as made by the President, are seldom set aside or interfered with by the Senate, unless on grounds of purely personal objection.

The position of the national judges as to their appointments and mode of tenure is very different from that of the State judges, to whom in a few lines I shall more specially allude. This should, Ithink, be specially noticed by Englishmen when criticising the doings of the American courts. I have observed statements made to the effect that decisions given by American judges as to international or maritime affairs affecting English interests could not be trusted, because the judges so giving them would have been elected by popular vote, and would be dependent on the popular voice for reappointment. This is not so. Judges are appointed by popular vote in very many of the States. But all matters affecting shipping and all questions touching foreigners are tried in the national courts before judges who have been appointed for life. I should not myself have had any fear with reference to the ultimate decision in the affair of Slidell and Mason had the "Trent" been carried into New York. I would, however, by no means say so much had the cause been one for trial before the tribunals of the State of New York.

I have been told that we in England have occasionally fallen into the error of attributing to the Supreme Court at Washington a quasi political power which it does not possess. This court can give no opinion to any department of the government, nor can it decide upon or influence any subject that has not come before it as a regularly litigated case in law. Though especially founded by the Constitution, it has no peculiar power under the Constitution, and stands in no peculiar relation either to that or to acts of Congress. It has no other power to decide on the constitutional legality of an act of Congress or an act of a State legislature, or of a public officer, than every court, State and National, high and low, possesses and is bound to exercise. It is simply the national court of last appeal.

In the different States such tribunals have been established as each State by its constitution and legislation has seen fit to adopt.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 青春不得已

    青春不得已

    每个人都有自己的路要走,所以在青春的拐弯口,免会有分离。就像初洛冉与周锦辰,安初夏与张鹏宇。来自不同世界的人,缘分让他们走到一起,命运却又逼迫着他们分离,明明一起经历了单薄的青春,却不能一起走向美好的未来。初洛冉想,那个把她哄睡着,又把她吓醒的少年,怕是再也见不着了。不要说再见,我害怕…这意味着再也不见…青春不得已,不得不相弃……周锦程,我能陪你一起长大,却不能陪你一起变老……
  • 转角遇见那个你

    转角遇见那个你

    眼看着初三即将毕业了,同学们又要各奔东西了!特别是她——江冰颜!我起誓过这辈子一定要让她笑!仅剩仅仅不到十个月!我要如何让她笑呢?不行!我杨起睿此生的任务就是让江冰颜笑!
  • 暮色点西桥

    暮色点西桥

    一座依湖而建的房子里,面容温和的女子向孩子和小表妹讲述自己年轻时的故事:初见他时,她不过七岁而已,又帅又臭屁的他让她一见钟情,从此追着他跑,毕生志愿就是成为他独一无二的新娘,拔掉他身边所有的野花。紧张的高考前夕,她惊悉他接近自己另有目的,一见钟情不过是他的骗局。心痛之下,她愤然和巴巴站在她身后的守护者离去,连一个认真的分手都吝啬给予。一别七年,她一无所有重新来到他的面前,他站在商界之巅睥睨众人,却再次让她心甘情愿走入情局。他亲口告诉她,在感情至深时将对方抛开,是他们最为热爱的把戏,这一生,他们都无法逃离。
  • 祸水乱世

    祸水乱世

    “我们……不管这天下,归隐竹林共白首可好,往后,你不是这东阳将军,我不是花满楼花魁。”城墙上的女子红衣烈烈,语气里尽是祈求。远处,男子身披金甲,淡淡道,“什么时候这天下变得国泰民安,我什么时候再谈儿女私情,况且,我与你没有可能。”啊哈哈哈,小雨第一次来,要为我加油哦,我想要你们的推荐票,我想要你们的亲亲,(??<`?)╭要糖糖
  • 天降萌狐:桃花朵朵开

    天降萌狐:桃花朵朵开

    天上掉下一只呆萌狐,地下有个腹黑帝,一场奇缘就此展开!他的后宫只愿有她一人,即使她是天上掉下来的蠢狐狸!她的身边只愿有他一人,即使他是人间最尊贵的腹黑帝!
  • 远古为王

    远古为王

    两个中学生。一次热血的挖掘改变了一生的命运
  • 羽凰

    羽凰

    传说中的恶魔复苏,天地都为之震动。人们以驱魔为信念追寻千万年,可究竟,谁才是真正的恶魔。
  • 口语艺术实用教程

    口语艺术实用教程

    口语艺术是语言艺术的重要组成部分,提高自身的口语艺术水平,有助于我们的工作、事业、社交和生活。本书是一本针对口语艺术训练的教材,包含了说话、演讲、朗读、朗诵、播音和配音等。本书的特色是:循序渐进的训练课目、案例教学、教学模块的设计,并配有相关教学内容的视频光盘。适合于各类大专院校学生和意欲提高口语水平的广大读者。
  • 云踪传奇

    云踪传奇

    中原武林存亡战---雁荡之役,十四年后竟再掀疑云风雨,谁知结果竟是......英雄总问,何为江湖。枭雄则问,何为天下。
  • 后宫殇

    后宫殇

    她是以特招身份入伍的在读研究生,一次和队友在沙漠勘探时遭遇风暴,醒来时才发现自己已经身处异世。她吃霸王餐被人打晕,他将她救走带回了自己的封地。“留下来跟本王一起保卫封地吧?”“不行!”“那你做本王的王妃如何?”“不做!”本王,你要不要这么烦,我只想做个安静的美少女。请不要纠缠我,谢谢!!!