登陆注册
15486800000053

第53章 13

The 'now' is the link of time, as has been said (for it connects past and future time), and it is a limit of time (for it is the beginning of the one and the end of the other). But this is not obvious as it is with the point, which is fixed. It divides potentially, and in so far as it is dividing the 'now' is always different, but in so far as it connects it is always the same, as it is with mathematical lines. For the intellect it is not always one and the same point, since it is other and other when one divides the line; but in so far as it is one, it is the same in every respect.

So the 'now' also is in one way a potential dividing of time, in another the termination of both parts, and their unity. And the dividing and the uniting are the same thing and in the same reference, but in essence they are not the same.

So one kind of 'now' is described in this way: another is when the time is near this kind of 'now'. 'He will come now' because he will come to-day; 'he has come now' because he came to-day. But the things in the Iliad have not happened 'now', nor is the flood 'now'-not that the time from now to them is not continuous, but because they are not near.

'At some time' means a time determined in relation to the first of the two types of 'now', e.g. 'at some time' Troy was taken, and 'at some time' there will be a flood; for it must be determined with reference to the 'now'. There will thus be a determinate time from this 'now' to that, and there was such in reference to the past event.

But if there be no time which is not 'sometime', every time will be determined.

Will time then fail? Surely not, if motion always exists. Is time then always different or does the same time recur? Clearly time is, in the same way as motion is. For if one and the same motion sometimes recurs, it will be one and the same time, and if not, not.

Since the 'now' is an end and a beginning of time, not of the same time however, but the end of that which is past and the beginning of that which is to come, it follows that, as the circle has its convexity and its concavity, in a sense, in the same thing, so time is always at a beginning and at an end. And for this reason it seems to be always different; for the 'now' is not the beginning and the end of the same thing; if it were, it would be at the same time and in the same respect two opposites. And time will not fail; for it is always at a beginning.

'Presently' or 'just' refers to the part of future time which is near the indivisible present 'now' ('When do you walk? 'Presently', because the time in which he is going to do so is near), and to the part of past time which is not far from the 'now' ('When do you walk?'

'I have just been walking'). But to say that Troy has just been taken-we do not say that, because it is too far from the 'now'.

'Lately', too, refers to the part of past time which is near the present 'now'. 'When did you go?' 'Lately', if the time is near the existing now. 'Long ago' refers to the distant past.

'Suddenly' refers to what has departed from its former condition in a time imperceptible because of its smallness; but it is the nature of all change to alter things from their former condition. In time all things come into being and pass away; for which reason some called it the wisest of all things, but the Pythagorean Paron called it the most stupid, because in it we also forget; and his was the truer view.

It is clear then that it must be in itself, as we said before, the condition of destruction rather than of coming into being (for change, in itself, makes things depart from their former condition), and only incidentally of coming into being, and of being. A sufficient evidence of this is that nothing comes into being without itself moving somehow and acting, but a thing can be destroyed even if it does not move at all. And this is what, as a rule, we chiefly mean by a thing's being destroyed by time. Still, time does not work even this change; even this sort of change takes place incidentally in time.

We have stated, then, that time exists and what it is, and in how many senses we speak of the 'now', and what 'at some time', 'lately', 'presently' or 'just', 'long ago', and 'suddenly' mean.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 九御灵诀

    九御灵诀

    天降九彩雪花,大陆风起云涌!绝世功法如繁星般出世,妖孽天才如雨后春笋般降生!天才与天才的碰撞,究竟谁能傲视群雄,站上巅峰?兄弟情义,红颜知己,这是一个丰富多彩的世界...
  • 命运论坛

    命运论坛

    命运是指事物有预定、有轨迹的进行的一种模式,又解为时间与空间之间的规则。行家说:命是命,运是运。“命”和“运”是两个不同的东西,合在一起构成“命运”。有些人相信人的一生凭由“命运”操控。有的人命好运不好,有的人运好命不好,也有都好和都坏的。难道命运不是掌握在自己的手里的吗?难道不是这样吗?我们就是不能认命,去创造,去改变自己的命运。去实现自己的梦想。
  • 隐储风云

    隐储风云

    老国王临死之际亲手埋下叛乱的种子,被命运选中的少女将与她的哥哥展开一场生死对决,而黑暗中的势力也在蠢蠢欲动……
  • 商女当道:心有千千银

    商女当道:心有千千银

    不是医生不是杀手更不是农业学高材生的庄千落,偏偏穿越成了一个地地道道的农家女。怎样把日子过的风生水起?怎样给瘫痪的老娘治病?成了她目前最头疼的两件事。初恋他娘拒婚,理由是她骗婚?男颜知己为救她,回到了初恋情的身边?原本以为是自己情定三生的霸道首席赶走她,原因居然是恋上自己的姐姐?这世上,到底还有什么感情是值得相信的?化失恋为动力,她的春天会来的。找矿石制玻璃,造纸术印刷术,只要能赚钱,她都来者不拒。结果,一不小心成了首富!
  • 天上没有多余的星星

    天上没有多余的星星

    她闭上眼睛嘴里喃喃道,缓缓走向大海深处,迎面而来的浪花一个接一个打在她的身上,直到脚尖再也触碰不到地面,“你这辈子都过不好了,谁给你来世”一个深沉的男声传来,她以为自己出现了幻觉没有理会,突然身体被揽进了一个坚实的怀抱
  • 沧海桑留

    沧海桑留

    这一生有过这样一段情,剩下的日子也就好走了很多……
  • 大方广佛华严经不思议佛境界分

    大方广佛华严经不思议佛境界分

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 血情诗

    血情诗

    伊诺诗:“我的人生就像漩涡,一直拉着我往下坠,别无选择。”伊诺诗:“他们说,当初是我自愿来这一趟的。但他们没告诉我,这一趟,我会爱上你。”伊诺诗:“这是生命中最危险的事情,可是我知道,如果再给我选择的机会,我还是会来。“简博:“失去从来都不可怕,可怕的是长年累月的去忘记。”简博:”永恒的时间里只有永恒的孤独。“简博:”瞬间是珍贵的因为稍纵即逝,你是最美的那朵昙花。“讲的是一个都市异能吸血鬼的爱情故事。有点虐有点甜,也许吧。
  • 莫凡语

    莫凡语

    一本关于武侠的书。在满布玄幻和修真的时代,我努力刻画一个武侠世界。我心中的武侠,真实的世界。莫凡语。有兴趣就看看吧,最好走之前能留下个评论,足够了。我唯一的目的,只是能让更多人看到。这,就是传说中的内容简介。
  • 星之囚

    星之囚

    星族白衣使徒蒙,为历练进入人间,却遭遇意想不到的情况……