登陆注册
15479900000008

第8章 II THE MANIAC(5)

I do not for the present attempt to prove to Haeckel that materialism is untrue, any more than I attempted to prove to the man who thought he was Christ that he was labouring under an error. I merely remark here on the fact that both cases have the same kind of completeness and the same kind of incompleteness. You can explain a man's detention at Hanwell by an indifferent public by saying that it is the crucifixion of a god of whom the world is not worthy.

The explanation does explain. Similarly you may explain the order in the universe by saying that all things, even the souls of men, are leaves inevitably unfolding on an utterly unconscious tree--the blind destiny of matter. The explanation does explain, though not, of course, so completely as the madman's. But the point here is that the normal human mind not only objects to both, but feels to both the same objection. Its approximate statement is that if the man in Hanwell is the real God, he is not much of a god. And, similarly, if the cosmos of the materialist is the real cosmos, it is not much of a cosmos. The thing has shrunk.

The deity is less divine than many men; and (according to Haeckel) the whole of life is something much more grey, narrow, and trivial than many separate aspects of it. The parts seem greater than the whole.

For we must remember that the materialist philosophy (whether true or not) is certainly much more limiting than any religion.

In one sense, of course, all intelligent ideas are narrow.

They cannot be broader than themselves. A Christian is only restricted in the same sense that an atheist is restricted.

He cannot think Christianity false and continue to be a Christian; and the atheist cannot think atheism false and continue to be an atheist. But as it happens, there is a very special sense in which materialism has more restrictions than spiritualism.

Mr. McCabe thinks me a slave because I am not allowed to believe in determinism. I think Mr. McCabe a slave because he is not allowed to believe in fairies. But if we examine the two vetoes we shall see that his is really much more of a pure veto than mine.

The Christian is quite free to believe that there is a considerable amount of settled order and inevitable development in the universe.

But the materialist is not allowed to admit into his spotless machine the slightest speck of spiritualism or miracle. Poor Mr. McCabe is not allowed to retain even the tiniest imp, though it might be hiding in a pimpernel. The Christian admits that the universe is manifold and even miscellaneous, just as a sane man knows that he is complex. The sane man knows that he has a touch of the beast, a touch of the devil, a touch of the saint, a touch of the citizen.

Nay, the really sane man knows that he has a touch of the madman.

But the materialist's world is quite simple and solid, just as the madman is quite sure he is sane. The materialist is sure that history has been simply and solely a chain of causation, just as the interesting person before mentioned is quite sure that he is simply and solely a chicken. Materialists and madmen never have doubts.

Spiritual doctrines do not actually limit the mind as do materialistic denials. Even if I believe in immortality I need not think about it. But if I disbelieve in immortality I must not think about it.

In the first case the road is open and I can go as far as I like; in the second the road is shut. But the case is even stronger, and the parallel with madness is yet more strange. For it was our case against the exhaustive and logical theory of the lunatic that, right or wrong, it gradually destroyed his humanity. Now it is the charge against the main deductions of the materialist that, right or wrong, they gradually destroy his humanity; I do not mean only kindness, I mean hope, courage, poetry, initiative, all that is human.

For instance, when materialism leads men to complete fatalism (as it generally does), it is quite idle to pretend that it is in any sense a liberating force. It is absurd to say that you are especially advancing freedom when you only use free thought to destroy free will.

The determinists come to bind, not to loose. They may well call their law the "chain" of causation. It is the worst chain that ever fettered a human being. You may use the language of liberty, if you like, about materialistic teaching, but it is obvious that this is just as inapplicable to it as a whole as the same language when applied to a man locked up in a mad-house. You may say, if you like, that the man is free to think himself a poached egg. But it is surely a more massive and important fact that if he is a poached egg he is not free to eat, drink, sleep, walk, or smoke a cigarette.

Similarly you may say, if you like, that the bold determinist speculator is free to disbelieve in the reality of the will.

But it is a much more massive and important fact that he is not free to raise, to curse, to thank, to justify, to urge, to punish, to resist temptations, to incite mobs, to make New Year resolutions, to pardon sinners, to rebuke tyrants, or even to say "thank you" for the mustard.

In passing from this subject I may note that there is a queer fallacy to the effect that materialistic fatalism is in some way favourable to mercy, to the abolition of cruel punishments or punishments of any kind. This is startlingly the reverse of the truth.

It is quite tenable that the doctrine of necessity makes no difference at all; that it leaves the flogger flogging and the kind friend exhorting as before. But obviously if it stops either of them it stops the kind exhortation. That the sins are inevitable does not prevent punishment; if it prevents anything it prevents persuasion.

Determinism is quite as likely to lead to cruelty as it is certain to lead to cowardice. Determinism is not inconsistent with the cruel treatment of criminals. What it is (perhaps) inconsistent with is the generous treatment of criminals; with any appeal to their better feelings or encouragement in their moral struggle.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 玄世苍狼

    玄世苍狼

    视寰宇,物利滔滔。惊苍茫,仁心寥寥。一代中药世家独子,本来应该继承祖业,锦衣玉食。无奈家族落势惨遭血洗,几经折磨,聪少狼性大开,弑神之路再无动摇,敢问九霄谁是主宰?
  • 仙剑奇侠之绝情

    仙剑奇侠之绝情

    她是神界神女,却因一片痴情,落入凡尘。他是神界将军,却因一场劫难,再入轮回。她是魔界公主,却因好奇心,步入尘世。他是蜀山弟子,却因天地无情,堕入魔道。唯美仙侠大作《仙剑奇侠之绝情》邀你共同完成我们未完成的梦······
  • 梦游书香枭筱情

    梦游书香枭筱情

    红颜若雪,惊舞翩跹,是谁,乱了谁的心,广袖轻拂,又是谁,迷了谁的眼情之为伤,苦了多少人,煞了多少忆;情之为悲,冷了多少清,落了多少思,挥洒多少痴情泪。饮一杯浊酒,品了多少世间情!若你是我的莲花,那么今生让我为你守一世长情
  • 火影之争锋

    火影之争锋

    火影同人大家都看过许多吧!而这本和以往的所有同人都有所不同。在这里你可以看到初代火影、宇智波斑、二代火影以及各个血继家族的鼻祖争锋的情境。霸绝无双的英雄人物他们都可以在这里一网打尽。这是一位帅哥理发师的忍者之路。我想写一本不一样的同人,我心中的火影。PS:火影已然完结,或不舍,或无奈。致我们心中的回忆!(虽然笔者是愤青,但是对于这部漫画,笔者有着特殊的情感。毕竟,这代表这笔者的童年!)
  • 坏蛋成长史

    坏蛋成长史

    每个男生都有一个江湖梦,有时候需要别人来帮你发掘。其实这样是很痛苦的,就如宝剑不经磨砺的痛苦哪来的锋利呢?人也是同样的。
  • 樱花之盟约

    樱花之盟约

    那年,她因为看到有人欺负他,为了保护他,她也受了伤,但他们从此认识了……十年后,他们再次相遇,他已认不出她,但她第一眼就记起来他就是十年前那个小男孩。她高傲,对人冷漠,但对他和朋友很热情,她就是一个千金大小姐他迷人,对人高冷社会是残酷的,在他记起她之后,因为父母的原因,禁止她和他来往,甚至于对他百般侮辱,那些富家子弟看不起他,也因为他的迷人百感不爽被人一边侮辱一边打……他发誓,他一定要让这些看不起他的人一个个跪下来给他道歉!她也是属于他的!
  • 月之魅

    月之魅

    一段情、一段事、一个人、热血、柔情,对与错的界线在哪里………………
  • 倾听大地

    倾听大地

    一个迄今为止对极大多数哲学家、文学家仍然淡漠的命题,实际上已经困扰人类很久了。如何拯救倾听大地,这种报告性环境保护文学值得我们认真拜读思考。
  • 别让坏心态毁了你

    别让坏心态毁了你

    本书旨在使读者以一种平和的心态去对待生活中的拥有和失去,凡事看得淡一点,给自己一份愉快的心情,好生活。
  • 晚安,我的男神大大TFBOYS

    晚安,我的男神大大TFBOYS

    又名《九月深蓝》我是应该和星星一起数着我们的未来,我是应该和你一起数着天上的星星。你的名字,占据我的青春。