登陆注册
15479900000008

第8章 II THE MANIAC(5)

I do not for the present attempt to prove to Haeckel that materialism is untrue, any more than I attempted to prove to the man who thought he was Christ that he was labouring under an error. I merely remark here on the fact that both cases have the same kind of completeness and the same kind of incompleteness. You can explain a man's detention at Hanwell by an indifferent public by saying that it is the crucifixion of a god of whom the world is not worthy.

The explanation does explain. Similarly you may explain the order in the universe by saying that all things, even the souls of men, are leaves inevitably unfolding on an utterly unconscious tree--the blind destiny of matter. The explanation does explain, though not, of course, so completely as the madman's. But the point here is that the normal human mind not only objects to both, but feels to both the same objection. Its approximate statement is that if the man in Hanwell is the real God, he is not much of a god. And, similarly, if the cosmos of the materialist is the real cosmos, it is not much of a cosmos. The thing has shrunk.

The deity is less divine than many men; and (according to Haeckel) the whole of life is something much more grey, narrow, and trivial than many separate aspects of it. The parts seem greater than the whole.

For we must remember that the materialist philosophy (whether true or not) is certainly much more limiting than any religion.

In one sense, of course, all intelligent ideas are narrow.

They cannot be broader than themselves. A Christian is only restricted in the same sense that an atheist is restricted.

He cannot think Christianity false and continue to be a Christian; and the atheist cannot think atheism false and continue to be an atheist. But as it happens, there is a very special sense in which materialism has more restrictions than spiritualism.

Mr. McCabe thinks me a slave because I am not allowed to believe in determinism. I think Mr. McCabe a slave because he is not allowed to believe in fairies. But if we examine the two vetoes we shall see that his is really much more of a pure veto than mine.

The Christian is quite free to believe that there is a considerable amount of settled order and inevitable development in the universe.

But the materialist is not allowed to admit into his spotless machine the slightest speck of spiritualism or miracle. Poor Mr. McCabe is not allowed to retain even the tiniest imp, though it might be hiding in a pimpernel. The Christian admits that the universe is manifold and even miscellaneous, just as a sane man knows that he is complex. The sane man knows that he has a touch of the beast, a touch of the devil, a touch of the saint, a touch of the citizen.

Nay, the really sane man knows that he has a touch of the madman.

But the materialist's world is quite simple and solid, just as the madman is quite sure he is sane. The materialist is sure that history has been simply and solely a chain of causation, just as the interesting person before mentioned is quite sure that he is simply and solely a chicken. Materialists and madmen never have doubts.

Spiritual doctrines do not actually limit the mind as do materialistic denials. Even if I believe in immortality I need not think about it. But if I disbelieve in immortality I must not think about it.

In the first case the road is open and I can go as far as I like; in the second the road is shut. But the case is even stronger, and the parallel with madness is yet more strange. For it was our case against the exhaustive and logical theory of the lunatic that, right or wrong, it gradually destroyed his humanity. Now it is the charge against the main deductions of the materialist that, right or wrong, they gradually destroy his humanity; I do not mean only kindness, I mean hope, courage, poetry, initiative, all that is human.

For instance, when materialism leads men to complete fatalism (as it generally does), it is quite idle to pretend that it is in any sense a liberating force. It is absurd to say that you are especially advancing freedom when you only use free thought to destroy free will.

The determinists come to bind, not to loose. They may well call their law the "chain" of causation. It is the worst chain that ever fettered a human being. You may use the language of liberty, if you like, about materialistic teaching, but it is obvious that this is just as inapplicable to it as a whole as the same language when applied to a man locked up in a mad-house. You may say, if you like, that the man is free to think himself a poached egg. But it is surely a more massive and important fact that if he is a poached egg he is not free to eat, drink, sleep, walk, or smoke a cigarette.

Similarly you may say, if you like, that the bold determinist speculator is free to disbelieve in the reality of the will.

But it is a much more massive and important fact that he is not free to raise, to curse, to thank, to justify, to urge, to punish, to resist temptations, to incite mobs, to make New Year resolutions, to pardon sinners, to rebuke tyrants, or even to say "thank you" for the mustard.

In passing from this subject I may note that there is a queer fallacy to the effect that materialistic fatalism is in some way favourable to mercy, to the abolition of cruel punishments or punishments of any kind. This is startlingly the reverse of the truth.

It is quite tenable that the doctrine of necessity makes no difference at all; that it leaves the flogger flogging and the kind friend exhorting as before. But obviously if it stops either of them it stops the kind exhortation. That the sins are inevitable does not prevent punishment; if it prevents anything it prevents persuasion.

Determinism is quite as likely to lead to cruelty as it is certain to lead to cowardice. Determinism is not inconsistent with the cruel treatment of criminals. What it is (perhaps) inconsistent with is the generous treatment of criminals; with any appeal to their better feelings or encouragement in their moral struggle.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 邪龙舞

    邪龙舞

    天地初开!邪魔乱世!人界生灵涂炭!一头由亿万邪魔之气形成的苍夜邪龙降临人界!人界由此而面临着毁灭的命运!无奈神界神王以生命为牵引将魔龙封印在了一个五岁孩童的左臂当中!这个少年将会面临什么命运呢·······
  • 再一次,结局

    再一次,结局

    不是在出差就是在出差的路上,把李乐精神压的极度紧张,一觉醒来,,居然回到了18岁的夏天。恍恍惚惚用了好几天才反应过来真的回去了。既然老天爷给了我一次重来的机会,这一次就让我把青春挥洒到底。"小美女,我喜欢你"看着某人深邃的眼睛,想起上一世就是因为看了这一眼就迷恋上去,最后落得逼自己逃离的下场。你喜欢我,我就要为你喜欢买单吗?开玩笑,重来的机会珍爱生命要远离渣男。
  • 中国工业发展报告:2008

    中国工业发展报告:2008

    《中国工业发展报告2008:中国工业改革开放30年》主要内容:30年来,我国工业发展取得了举世瞩目的成就,最根本的原因是开辟了有中国特色社会主义道路,实行了改革开放的方针。这条道路既汲取了新中国成立到1978年我国社会主义革命和建设的经验与教训,也借鉴了国际上一些国家和地区实现工业现代化的成功做法。这条道路立足于社会主义初级阶段的中国国情,把马克思主义的基本原理与当代中国的实际相结合,坚持与时俱进,不断探索,勇于创新,改革不适应经济基础要求的上层建筑,调整束缚生产力发展的生产关系。
  • 全世界都不如你

    全世界都不如你

    “我喜欢你,你还愿意喜欢我吗?”“我愿意啊!”
  • 天御临凡

    天御临凡

    天机变动,众仙临凡,众生相争,皆道:天道不予,吾自取之
  • 曹冲称相

    曹冲称相

    屌丝宅男曹冲意外穿越,成为东汉末年神童曹冲;曹冲不在意什么神童身份,重要的是他成为官二代;什么情况?一般主角穿越后不是都要开启主角光环吗?没有自带金手指也要有王八之气吧?怎么曹冲还是成为短命鬼,只活到十三岁又病死了;本以为好运到此为止的曹冲发现,自己又变成了一个五岁的小孩。
  • who的青春不疯狂

    who的青春不疯狂

    一个少年的经历,一段成长的传奇,,,,,
  • 问客

    问客

    少年俞自斟天资聪颖,十六岁自创剑法《问客》,后与一人切磋武艺,不料失手伤人,致其命丧黄泉……得知这一切后,天性善良的俞自斟惶惶不能终日,随之而来的是内心的愧疚与一场场追杀。未曾想到,原来这一切,竟是有心人的一场阴谋……阴谋诡计,明争暗夺,一切精彩,尽在《问客》。
  • 心锁花颜蛊

    心锁花颜蛊

    我夏静颜,不就是想知道自己一直以来做的梦吗?怎么遇上了个奇怪的老奶奶给了我一块玉佩就消失掉了,最大的问题是我竟然穿越了……
  • 异界嗜血天下

    异界嗜血天下

    地球3000年八岁的徐阳跟随家人乘坐私人宇宙飞船去往火星探旅...中途遇到万年难见的太阳风暴将宇宙飞船卷入了黑洞...逃生后的徐阳醒来后,来到了一个陌生的世界...这个世界对徐阳充满了神秘...--------------------(求收藏,求推荐)