登陆注册
15325700000068

第68章

But, fathers, you shall not escape by these vain artifices; for I shall put some questions to you so simple, that they will not admit of coming under your distinguo.I ask you, then, without speaking of "positive rights,"of "outward presumptions," or "external tribunals"- I ask if, according to your authors, a beneficiary would be simoniacal, were he to give a benefice worth four thousand livres of yearly rent, and to receive ten thousand francs ready money, not as the price of the benefice, but merely as a motive inducing him to give it? Answer me plainly, fathers: What must we make of such a case as this according to your authors? Will not Tanner tell us decidedly that "this is not simony in point of conscience, seeing that the temporal good is not the price of the benefice, but only the motive inducing to dispose of it?" Will not Valentia, will not your own Theses of Caen, will not Sanchez and Escobar, agree in the same decision and give the same reason for it? Is anything more necessary to exculpate that beneficiary from simony? And, whatever might be your private opinion of the case, durst you deal with that man as a simonist in your confessionals, when he would be entitled to stop your mouth by telling you that he acted according to the advice of so many grave doctors? Confess candidly, then, that, according to your views, that man would be no simonist; and, having done so, defend the doctrine as you best can.Such, fathers, is the true mode of treating questions, in order to unravel, instead of perplexing them, either by scholastic terms, or, as you have done in your last charge against me here, by altering the state of the question.Tanner, you say, has, at any rate, declared that such an exchange is a great sin; and you blame me for having maliciously suppressed this circumstance, which, you maintain, "completely justifies him." But you are wrong again, and that in more ways than one.For, first, though what you say had been true, it would be nothing to the point, the question in the passage to which I referred being, not if it was sin, but if it was simony.Now, these are two very different questions.Sin, according to your maxims, obliges only to confession- simony obliges to restitution;and there are people to whom these may appear two very different things.

You have found expedients for making confession a very easy affair; but you have not fallen upon ways and means to make restitution an agreeable one.Allow me to add that the case which Tanner charges with sin is not simply that in which a spiritual good is exchanged for a temporal, the latter being the principal end in view, but that in which the party "prizes the temporal above the spiritual," which is the imaginary case already spoken of.And it must be allowed he could not go far wrong in charging such a case as that with sin, since that man must be either very wicked or very stupid who, when permitted to exchange the one thing for the other, would not avoid the sin of the transaction by such a simple process as that of abstaining from comparing the two things together.Besides, Valentia, in the place quoted, when treating the question- if it be sinful to give a spiritual good for a temporal, the latter being the main consideration-and after producing the reasons given for the affirmative, adds, "Sed hoc non videtur mihi satis certum- But this does not appear to my mind sufficiently certain." Since that time, however, your father, Erade Bille, professor of cases of conscience at Caen, has decided that there is no sin at all in the case supposed; for probable opinions, you know, are always in the way of advancing to maturity.This opinion he maintains in his writings of 1644, against which M.Dupre, doctor and professor at Caen, delivered that excellent oration, since printed and well known.For though this Erade Bille confesses that Valentia's doctrine, adopted by Father Milhard and condemned by the Sorbonne, "is contrary to the common opinion, suspected of simony, and punishable at law when discovered in practice," he does not scruple to say that it is a probable opinion, and consequently sure in point of conscience, and that there is neither simony nor sin in it.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 走出蓝水河(名家小说自选集)

    走出蓝水河(名家小说自选集)

    名家小说自选集 (共6册)丛书。包括《涸辙》、《蝙蝠》、《营生》等篇目,体现了赵本夫独特粗犷的美学意境和语言风格。丛书中还有 《桃花灿烂》,《访问城市》,《单身贵族》,《伏牛》,《天缺一角》。
  • 穿越之语岚逆袭记

    穿越之语岚逆袭记

    21世纪的特工穿越到左丞相府四小姐南宫语岚身上,面对他人的轻视,表姐的种种阴谋陷阱是否能平安生存下来,又会有何艳遇,是真爱到临还是有一场阴谋呢
  • 异界远古之恐龙崛起

    异界远古之恐龙崛起

    莫名其妙的远古穿越,无与伦比的极致能力。无形的危险,潜伏的阴谋。烈阳等人该何去何从。
  • 云夕

    云夕

    21世纪的腐女,男友跟闺蜜好上了,受了刺激摔个跟头就莫名来到了从未听说过的年代!穿越就穿越了,可居然穿在了一个被遗弃的孕妇身上!想带着孩子过自己快活的生活!却不想被贴身丫鬟卖了,差点丢了性命!不经意间爱上了霸道王爷,却天天要智斗正妻小妾!好不容易扫平一切,以为可以双宿双飞,却来了个邻国公主横插一脚!怎么办?看云夕一手创造自己的美好生活!
  • 王之瞳

    王之瞳

    曾经给家族带来灭顶之灾的两个孩子,最终归来,带来的是无限的荣耀
  • 上古世纪之无限轮回

    上古世纪之无限轮回

    当千年过后,还有谁记得那个故事。那些传说,那些热血的征程。在被遗忘的背后,隐藏了多少的泪和欢笑。即使最终他成为了神,他最怀念的还是那年,他和伙伴一起在夜晚躺在屋顶上看夜空他梦想的日子。
  • 我来自花果山

    我来自花果山

    一个仙魔佛妖林立的世界,一个人类少年来自花果山,向着灵山走去。
  • TFBOYS守候舒娴

    TFBOYS守候舒娴

    王俊凯,我把你藏在了心底,深深地。我为你,有了写日记的习惯。你会不会注意我,你说,爱情不是一瞬间时,我不爱你了。
  • 师父等我:徒弟别作死

    师父等我:徒弟别作死

    宅在易寒峰一万三千八百三十八年的易冷同学某天在竹林捡到徒弟一只看着地上直挺挺的死尸易冷皱了皱眉,捏了个去尘决瞬间地上的人就变得干净了不少易冷的眉舒展了想到他一万年来从未有过徒弟手一挥,空中出现一个灵球雷系天灵根,正好易寒峰只收雷系天灵根弟子于是,念了一口诀,瞬间出现在易寒峰顶上。此刻的夕颜,还不知道什么情况一醒来,看到一男的在自己眼前第一反应,扬手扇了一耳光于是,万年来从未被人打过的易冷尊上结结实实的挨了一巴掌.............七年后师父为什么不早点来救我?七个月后。师父我不是故意作死的。三个月后。师父你徒弟又挂了。一个月后。我已经习惯了作死!
  • 豪门小媳难养

    豪门小媳难养

    他管得够宽的!管她的饮食起居,管她的工作,还管她交男朋友!温柔、霸道、还有点小孩子气,到底哪一面才是真正的他,她竟然深陷其中不可自拔,关键时刻他竟然给她落跑!虏获了老娘的心却拍拍屁股走人,想的倒美!总裁了不起,找个男神分分钟秒杀你,你就等着哭吧!