登陆注册
15323100000072

第72章 THE MERRY WIDOWS(15)

Then followed the speech of Maitre Alem-Rousseau on behalf of the Veuve Lacoste.Among other things the advocate brought forward the fact that Euphemie was not so poorly born as the prosecution had made out, but that she had every chance of inheriting some 20,000 francs from her parents.It was notorious that when Henri Lacoste first broached the subject of marriage with Euphemie he was not so rich as he afterwards became, but, in fact, believed he had lost the inheritance from his brother Philibert, this last having made a will in favour of a young man of whom popular rumour made him the father.This was in 1839.The marriage was celebrated in May of 1841.Henri Lacoste, it is true, had hidden his intentions, but when news of the marriage reached the ears of brother Philibert that brother was so delighted that he destroyed the will whichdisinherited Henri.It was thus right to say that Euphemie became the benefactor of her husband.Where was the speculative marriage on the part of Euphemie that the prosecution talked about?

Maitre Alem-Rousseau made short work of the medico-legal evidence (he had little bother with the facts of the illness).Poison was found in the body.The question was, how had it got there? Was it quite certain that arsenic could not get into the human body save by ingestion, that it could not exist in the human body normally? The science of the day said no, he knew, but the science of yesterday had said yes.Who knew what the science of to-morrow would say?

The advocate made use of the evidence of a witness whose testimony I have failed to find in the accounts of the trial.This witness spoke of Lacoste's having asked, in Bordeaux, for a certain liquor of Saint-Louis,'' a liquor which Mme Lacoste took to be an anisette.No,'' said Lacoste,women don't take it.'' Maitre Alem-Rousseau had tried to discover what this liquor of Saint-Louis was.During the trial he had come upon the fact that the arsenical preparation known as Fowler's solution had been administered for the first time in the hospital of Saint-Louis, in Paris.He showed an issue of the Hospital Gazette in which the advertisement could be read: Solution de Fowler telle qu'on l'administre a SAINT-LOUIS!'' The jury could make what they liked of that fact.

The advocate now produced documents to prove that the marriage of Euphemie with her grand-uncle had not been so much to her advantage, but had been--it must have been--a marriage of affection.At the time when the marriage was arranged, he proved, Lacoste had no more than 35,000 francs to his name.Euphemie had 15,000 francs on her marriage and the hope of 20,000 francs more.The pretence of the prosecution, that her contentment with the abject duties which she had to perform in the house was dictated by interest, fell to the ground with the preliminary assumption that she had married for her husband's money.

Maitre Alem, defending the widow's gayish conduct after her husband's death, declared it to be natural enough.It had been shown to be innocent.He trounced the Press for helping to exaggerate the rumours which envy of Mme Lacoste's good fortune had created.He asked thejury to acquit Mme Lacoste.

The Procureur du Roi had another say.It was again an attempt to destroy the `system' of the defence, but by making a mystery of the fact that the Lacoste-Verges marriage had not taken place in a church he gave the wily Maitre Alem an opportunity for following him.

The summing-up of the President on the third day of the trial was, it is said, a model of clarity and impartiality.The jury returned on all the points put to them a verdict of Not guilty'' for both the accused.

Another verdict may now seem to have been hardly possible.The accusation was built up on the jealousy of neighbours, on chance circumstances, on testimonies founded on petty spite.But, combined with the medico-legal evidence, the weight of circumstance might easily have hoisted the accused in the balance.

It will be seen, then, how much on foot the case of the Veuve Lacoste was with that of the Veuve Boursier, twenty years before.

It is on the experience of cases such as these two that the technique of investigation into arsenical poison has been evolved.In the case of Veuve Boursier you find M.Orfila discovering oxide of arsenic where M.Barruel saw only grains of fat.Four years previous to the case of the Veuve Lacoste that same Orfila came into the trial of Mme Lafarge with the first use in medical jurisprudence of the Marsh test, and based on the experiment a cocksure opinion which had much to do with the condemnation of that unfortunate woman.In the Lacoste trial you find the Parisian experts giving an opinion of no greater value than that of Orfila's in the Lafarge case, but find also an element of doubt introduced by the country practitioner, with his common sense on the then moot question of the accumulation, the absorption, and elimination of the drug.

Nowadays we are quite certain that our experts in medical jurisprudence know all there is to know about arsenical poisoning.What are the chances, however, in spite of our apparently well-founded faith, that some bristle-headed local chemist with a fighting chin will not spring up at an arsenic-poisoning trial and, with new facts about the substance,blow to pieces the cocksure evidence of the leading expert in pathology? It may seem impossible that such a thing can ever happen again--a mistake regarding the action of arsenic on the human body.But when we discover it becoming a commonplace of science that one human may be poisoned by an everyday substance which thousands of his fellows eat with enjoyment as well as impunity--a substance, for instance, as everyday as porridge--who will dare say even now that the last word has been said and written of arsenic?

But that, as the late George Moore so doted on saying, is quelconque.

M.Orfila, sure about the grocer of the Rue de la Paix, was defeated by M.Barruel.M.Orfila, sure about the death of Charles Lafarge, is declared by to-day's experts in criminal jurisprudence and pathology to have been talking through his hat.According to the present experts, says Philip Curtin,'' Lafarge was not poisoned at all, but died a natural death.Because of M.Devergie it was for the Veuve Lacoste as much `touch and go' as it was for the Veuve Boursier twenty years before.Well might Marie-Fortunee Lafarge, hearing in prison of the verdict in the Lacoste trial, say, Ma condamnation a sauve Madame Lacoste!''

In all this there's a moral lesson somewhere, but I'm blessed if I can put my finger on it.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 三生三逝

    三生三逝

    生又何妨,死又何哀!生的起点是死,死的终点为生。生是有目的的去死,死是有追求的去生!
  • 做人要拿得起放得下

    做人要拿得起放得下

    做人要拿得起放得下可以看作是一个人立身于世所必备的基本能力和素质,也可以看成是关键时刻做事所表现出来的个性与态度。它大到可以决定一个人命运的战略举措,小到一个人日常举止的每一个细节。它既包括获取物质财富的绝妙策略,也包括对自我精神的完美塑造。可以说无数成功人士都是精于做人之道的高手,他们纷纷将成就归功于做人拿得起放得下的策略。
  • 三国之灭蛮

    三国之灭蛮

    生为董卓的儿子,董辰表示压力很大,一边是自己亲人,一边是汉人江山,他誓要灭蛮,不让五胡乱华再现,他誓要高句丽不再作死,他誓要东瀛从地球消失。美女?是靠强娶的。人才?是靠抢来的。对手?一个坑,一个压,一个讨好。
  • 赤瞳变身系统

    赤瞳变身系统

    高一屌丝男李毅,父母双亡,仅留下50万和一套房子。一次李毅捡到一个黑色的石头,没想到那竟然是变身系统!现在我李毅成功的变成女的,唉,,望着镜子里的自己,我简直就想哭。她喵的变成呆萌的赤瞳了而且没有多牛逼的武器和力气,第二天喵的还给我弄个失忆,而且系统再也没回答我的问题。(变身虐主的,各种羞耻)(我还有学业,不能每天都更新,反正吧,我会尽量的,)
  • 剑出昆山

    剑出昆山

    每个人的心中都有属于自己的一个江湖,小说中只有意境,写法带虚。画面全靠脑补,只写意不写实。这是属于大家的江湖、属于大家的玄幻小说。
  • 校园派对

    校园派对

    这学期我们班来了一位新同学,我与她成为了好朋友,可我却万万没想到她竟是我们学校慕容校长的千金,我和她一起经历了许多有趣的事......
  • 轮回之末日边缘

    轮回之末日边缘

    在末世生存一年多的关成林还是避免不了死亡的命运,死前却见到神秘的黑色斗篷人,令其神奇的重生,带着上一世的记忆和他满脑子的疑问,为何会重生,这其中是到底隐藏了何种秘密,地球上发生的骤变到底怎么是一回事!那些不属于地球的生物到底从何而来……拥有可以制造装备的神奇水晶,命运的齿轮是否会因此而偏离原本的轨道……
  • 撒旦绝恋Ⅰ:绝情总裁的契约新娘

    撒旦绝恋Ⅰ:绝情总裁的契约新娘

    他摁了下遥控板,窗帘自动拉起。向她走来。捏着她的下巴,审视她的五官。美,是个美人儿。吹弹可破的肌*肤,清澈的眼眸此刻满是怒火,小巧俏挺的鼻子,如玫瑰花一般的唇瓣。即使是现在愤怒的表情,也难掩她的瑰丽。
  • 穿越:恋过晨光

    穿越:恋过晨光

    穿越时空能够遇到你,这是上天的安排,你逃不掉,如果你敢扔下我一个人,我就!等你回来,我相信,你一定会在某个阳光明媚的早晨,牵起我的手,对我说:我爱你。
  • 南翼

    南翼

    时间陷入沉睡,历史变成空白,唯有孤寂的墟记录着耀眼的辉煌。文明的出现总是伴着伤痛,难言的伤痛点点滴滴又有谁敢去承受?