登陆注册
14926500000036

第36章 (1)

DIVISION OF LABOR AND MACHINERY

T he division of labor, according to M. Proudhon, opens the series of economic evolutions.

"Considered in its essence, the | division of labor is the manner | in which equality of conditions | and intelligence is realized."

Good side of the |(Vol.I, p.93)division of labor

"The division of labor has | become for us an instrument of | poverty."

(Vol.I, p.94)

Variant

"Labor, by dividing itself | according to the law which is | peculiar to it, and which is the Bad side of the | primary conditions of its fruit-division of labor| fulness, ends in the negation of | its aims and destroys itself."

(Vol.I, p.94)

To find the "recomposition Problem to be solved | which wipes out the drawbacks | of the division, while retaining | its useful effects."

(Vol.I, p.97) The division of labor is, according to M. Proudhon, an eternal law, a simple, abstract category. Therefore the abstraction, the idea, the word must suffice for him to explain the division of labor at different historical epochs.

Castes, corporations, manufacture, large-scale industry, must be explained by the single word divide . First study carefully the meaning of "divide", and you will have no need to study the numerous influences which give the division of labor a defintive character in every epoch.

Certainly, things would be made much too easy if they were reduced to M. Proudhon's categories. History does not proceed so categorically.

It took three whole centuries in Germany to establish the first big division of labor, the separation of the towns from the country. In proportion, as this one relation of town and country was modified, the whole of society was modified. To take only this one aspect of the division of labor, you have the old republics, and you have Christian feudalism; you have old England with its barons and you have modern England with its cotton lords.

In the 14th and 15th centuries, when there were as yet no colonies, when America did not yet exist for Europe, when Asia existed only through the intermediary of Constantinople, when the Mediterranean was the centre of commercial activity, the division of labor had a very different form, a very different aspect from that of the 17th century, when t he Spanish, the Portuguese, the Dutch, the English, and the French had colonies established in all parts of the world. The extent of the market, its physiognomy, give to the division of labor at different periods a physiognomy, a character, which it would be difficult to deduce from the single word divide , from the idea, from the category.

"All economists since Adam Smith," says M. Proudhon, "have pointed out the advantages and drawbacks of the law of div- ision, but insist much more on the first than on the second, because that was more serviceable for their optimism, and none of them has ever wondered what could be the drawbacks to a law.... How does the same principle, pursued vigor- ously to its consequences, lead to diametrically opposite results? Not one economist before or since A. Smith has even perceived that here was a problem to elucidate. Say goes to the length of recognizing that in the division of labor the same cause that produces the good engenders the bad."[I 95-96]

Adam Smith goes further than M. Proudhon thinks. He saw clearly that "the difference of natural talents in different men is, in reality, much less than we are aware of; and the very dif- ferent genius which appears to distinguish men of different professions, when grown up to maturity, is not so much the cause as the effect of the division of labor."[I 20]

In principle, a porter differs less from a philosopher than a mastiff from a greyhound. It is the division of labor which has set a gulf between theM.

All this does not prevent M. Proudhon from saying elsewhere that Adam Smith has not the slightest idea of the drawbacks produced by the division of labor. it is this again that makes him say that J. B. Say was the first to recognize "that in the division of labor the same cause that produces the good engenders the bad." [I 96]

But let us listen to Lemontey; Suum cuique .[34]

"M. J. B. Say has done me the honor of adopting in his excellent treatise on political economy the principle that I brought to light in this fragment on the moral influence of the division of labor. The somewhat frivolous title of my book [35] doubtless prevented him from citing me. It is only to this motive that I can attribute the silence of a writer too rich in his own stock to disavow so modest a load."(Lemontey, OEuvres completes , Vol.I, p.245, Paris 1840)Let us do him this justice: Lemontey wittily exposed the unpleasant consequences of the division of labor as it is constituted today, and M. Proudhon found nothing to add to it. But now that, through the fault of M. Proudhon, we have been drawn into this question of priority, let us say again, in passing, that long before M. Lemontey, and 17 years before Adam Smith, who was a pupil of A. Ferguson, the last-named gave a clear exposition of the subject in a chapter which deals specifically with the division of labor.

"It may even be doubted, whether the measure of national capacity increases with the advancement of arts. Many mech- anical arts... succeed best under a total suppression of sentiment and reason; and ignorance is the mother of indus- try as well as superstition. Reflection and fancy are sub- ject to err; but a habit of moving the hand, or the foot, is independent of either. Manufactures, accordingly, prosper most, where the mind is least consulted, and where the work- shop may, without any great effort of imagination, be considered as an engine, the parts of which are men....

"The general officer may be a great proficient in the knowledge of war, while the skill of the soldier is confined to a few motions of the hand and the foot. The former may have gained what the latter has lost....

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 如果喜欢你

    如果喜欢你

    一朝相见,一见钟情;我喜欢你时,你不喜欢我;你喜欢我时,我还不知道你。如果能重来,我一定要先喜欢上你。
  • 铁血的亚特斯

    铁血的亚特斯

    真理只有一个,混乱的世界不存在正义,只有英雄。
  • 王子的双向公主

    王子的双向公主

    她,智商高情商低,但她拥有"双向"的性格特点成功掳获两位王子的心,而他们的学校是完全不沾边的,他们是如何相遇、相恋的,到底哪个才是她的白马王子。。。
  • 嫡女逆袭夫君太凶残

    嫡女逆袭夫君太凶残

    因为小时候的一个愿望,把21岁的宋青禾带到古代,开始了她的逆袭!原主爹爹的小妾陷害是嘛,没关系我有的是招对付你!没魔兽是嘛,战!沈初阳是吧,打不过我还跑不过吗?!“娘子别跑了,你看你都出了这么多汗了”沈初阳脚下轻松一点,便蹦到了宋青禾身边,拿出一块小手绢帮宋青禾擦汗“沈初阳!!!!!!”……
  • 诸神黄昏之覆灭的诸神

    诸神黄昏之覆灭的诸神

    那可能要付出很多努力吧,也许是一个漫长的过程,总是不断的历练,不断的探索,摸索着。眼前那么多主宰人们生死的强者,确实很不甘心啊!但我绝对不会认输的!因为我一定可以通过自己的努力,总有一天......超越你们!覆灭你们这群昏庸之士
  • 福妻驾到

    福妻驾到

    现代饭店彪悍老板娘魂穿古代。不分是非的极品婆婆?三年未归生死不明的丈夫?心狠手辣的阴毒亲戚?贪婪而好色的地主老财?吃上顿没下顿的贫困宭境?不怕不怕,神仙相助,一技在手,天下我有!且看现代张悦娘,如何身带福气玩转古代,开面馆、收小弟、左纳财富,右傍美男,共绘幸福生活大好蓝图!!!!快本新书《天媒地聘》已经上架开始销售,只要3.99元即可将整本书抱回家,你还等什么哪,赶紧点击下面的直通车,享受乐乐精心为您准备的美食盛宴吧!)
  • 娶个农妇当皇后

    娶个农妇当皇后

    自己原是风家女,流入民间十余载又穷又苦,又黑又瘦又丑。没有粮,自己种,没有钱,银两你快到碗里来。再次回归,良田千余倾,银两数不清爹爹疼爱,庶妹眼红,姨娘想占为已有各种阴谋蜂蛹而来,看我如何七十二变。米虫相公原是当朝太子,妈的,你能不能不要那么会装“好吧,农妇,娶了你当皇后如何?”好吧,上一世事业顺利,爱情失意这一世定要爱情事业两得意。情景一“娘子,种那么多田,种那么多药做什么,为夫有的是钱,全国的金银随你调。”某男手持玉佩好不得意。某女接过玉佩把玩了一阵,然后摔向地上。“你骗三岁小孩呢,上次我都上各大钱庄问过了,一分钱都提不出来。”某女狠狠道。“娘子,别生气,为夫这就下地帮你干活去,还不行吗?帮你挣钱多多。”某男捡起玉佩擦了擦,算那些人还识相,要是透露出自己的身份半句,自己定饶不了他们。“滚,给我下地干活去。”自己怎么就嫁了这么一个牛皮大王,某女抚额。情景二“奉天承运,皇帝诏曰:风家有女,天姿国色,贤良淑德,朕仰慕已久,遂以朕之皇后,择日迎娶,钦此。”公公手拿圣旨,恭恭敬敬对着前面跪着的某女。开玩笑,这可是皇上捧在手心里的皇后,能不恭敬吗?那不是不要命了。“请公公回禀皇上,谢皇上错爱,民女已是有夫之妇,肯请皇上收回圣旨。”某女跪地不起,不接圣旨,皇上品味太怪,自己已嫁人的消息满城皆知,皇上又怎能不知?又怎么会娶自己为后。“皇上说了,你那相公不思进取,允你先休再嫁。”公公看着某女,谄媚的向某女转达皇上旨意。某女头顶飞过一群乌鸭,皇上这是要公然强抢有夫之妇?。“民女不允,皇室欠我五百万石粮食未还,一万斤各种草药未给钱,还清了我再考虑休夫之事。”“我的娘子,这事可是由不得你,粮食和药钱刚刚为夫我都已给清,这下可答应做我的皇后?”某男黄袍在身,款款而来。听见熟悉的声音,笑笑看向某男。“混蛋,怎么是你?”眼前这人不是上宫南天是谁。“就是我,夫人可还满意。”“不,我要休夫~~~”某女大惊“已经来不及了~~~”某男扛起某女大踏步走向皇宫寝殿。男女主身心干净,绝对一对一结局,各位亲放心跳坑。
  • 穿越位面之熊出没

    穿越位面之熊出没

    某人的奇迹穿梭之旅!!!!!!!!!!!!!这是某人的第一部穿越所在地。好了,话不多说,马上起程。
  • 萌夫嫁到.好色小仙吃嫩草

    萌夫嫁到.好色小仙吃嫩草

    明明就是个萌妹子,奈何长了颗汉子心。好色成性就算了,你敢不敢别这么嚣张?片段一:“仙子姐姐你好漂亮!”“……”“仙子姐姐你给我亲一下好不好!”“本帝是男的!”明明就是个高冷的妹子,咋开口就成了汉子嘞?哟西,原来是天帝……纳尼?!!偶错了,求放过啊~片段二:某殿一脚踏在凳子上,看着对面笑得无比妖孽的少年。“其实你也长得挺俊的,可惜啊,一,本殿只喜欢女的。二,本殿没有恋童癖!”某殿的侍婢:“女君,澔霖仙君与你是有婚约……”“我怎么不知道!”“因为婚约是在昨夜定下的!现在整个仙界都知道了。”某仙愣……三,二,一……撤!!未婚夫来袭,某仙如临大敌。嘤嘤嘤,人家还没单够呢!不带这么玩儿的!雅蠛碟!!
  • 前人田地后人收

    前人田地后人收

    内蒙古高原上,一个军马场的前尘往事。点击阅读