登陆注册
14926500000021

第21章 (3)

But in commerce 100 such quarters would never have been worth more than 50. By changing the name we do not change the thing. The quantity of wheat, whither supplied or demanded, will be neither decreased nor increased by this mere change of name. Thus, the relation between supply and demand being just the same in spite of this change of name, the price of wheat will undergo no real change. When we speak of the supply and demand of things, we do not speak of the supply and demand of the name of things.

Philip I was not a maker of gold and silver, as M. Proudhon says; he was a maker of names for coins. Pass off your French cashmeres as Asiatic cashmeres, and you may deceive a buyer or two; but once the fraud becomes known, your so-called Asiatic cashmeres will drop to the price of French cashmeres.

When he put a false label on gold and silver, King Philip could deceive only so long as the fraud was not known. Like any other shopkeeper, he deceived his customers by a false description of his wares, which could not last for long. He was bound sooner or later to suffer the rigour of commercial laws. Is this what M. Proudhon wanted to prove? No. According to him, it is from the sovereign and not from commerce that money gets its value. And what has he really proved? That commerce is more sovereign than the sovereign. Let the sovereign decree that one mark shall in future be two marks, commerce will keep on saying that these two marks are worth no more than one mark was formerly.

But, for all that, the question of value determined by the quantity of labor has not been advanced a step. It still remains to be decided whether the value of these two marks (which have become what one mark was once)is determined by the cost of production or by the law of supply and demand.

M. Proudhon continues: "It should even be borne in mind that if, instead of debasing the currency, it had been in the king's power to double its bulk, the exchange value of gold and silver would immediately have dropped by half, always from reasons of proportion and equilibrium."[I 71]

If this opinion, which M. Proudhon shares with the other economists, is valid, it argues in favor of the latter's doctrine of supply and demand, and in no way in favor of M. Proudhon's proportionality. For, whatever the quantity of labor embodied in the doubled bulk of gold and silver, its value would have dropped by half, the demand having remained the same and the supply having doubled. Or can it be, by any chance, that the "law of proportionality" would have become confused this time with the so much disdained law of supply and demand? This true proportion of M. Proudhon's is indeed so elastic, is capable of so many variations, combination and permutations, that it might well coincide for once with the relation between supply and demand.

To make "every commodity acceptable in exchange, if not in practice then at least by right", on the basis of the role of gold and silver is, then, to misunderstand this role. Gold and silver are acceptable by right only because they are acceptable in practice; and they are acceptable in practice because the present organization of production needs a universal medium of exchange. Right is only the official recognition of fact.

We have seen that the example of money as an application of value which has attained constitution was chosen by M. Proudhon only to smuggle through his whole doctrine of exchangeability, that is to say, to prove that every commodity assessed by its cost of production must attain the status of money. All this would be very fine, were it not for the awkward fact that precisely gold and silver, as money, are of all commodities the only ones not determined by their cost of production; and this is so true that in circulation they can be replaced by paper. So long as there is a certain proportion observed between the requirements of circulation and the amount of money issued, be it paper, gold, platinum, or copper money, there can be no question of a proportion to be observed between the intrinsic value (cost of production) and the nominal value of money. Doubtless, in international trade, money is determined, like any other commodity, by labor time. But it is also true that gold and silver in international trade are means of exchange as products and not as money. In other words, they lose this characteristic of "stability and authenticity", of "sovereign consecration", which, for M. Proudhon, forms their specific characteristic.

Ricardo understood the truth so well that, after basing his whole system on value determined by labor time, and after saying:

"Gold and silver, like all other commodities, are valuable only in proportion to the quantity of labor necessary to produce them, and bring them to market", he adds, nevertheless, that the value of money is not determined by the labor time its substance embodies, but by the law of supply and demand only.

"Though it [paper money] has no intrinsic value, yet, by limiting its quantity, its value in exchange is as great as an equal denomination of coin, or of bullion in that coin. On the same principle, too, namely, by limitation of its quantity, a debased coin would circulate at the value it should bear, if it were of the legal weight and fineness, and not at the value of the quantity of metal which it actually contained. In the history of the British coinage, we find, accordingly, that the currency was never depreciated in the same proportion that it was debased; the reason of which was, that it never was increased in quantity, in proportion to its diminished intrinsic value."(Ricardo, loc. cit. [pp.206-07])

This is what J. B. Say observes on this passage of Ricardo's:

"This example should suffice, I think, to convince the author that the basis of all value is not the amount of labor needed to make a commodity, but the need felt for that commodity, balanced by its scarcity."[ The reference is to Say's note on the French edition of Ricardo's book, Vol.II, pp.206-07. ]

同类推荐
  • 船头

    船头

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 吉验篇

    吉验篇

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 梦粱录

    梦粱录

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 六十种曲白兔记

    六十种曲白兔记

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
  • 后唐宗庙乐舞辞

    后唐宗庙乐舞辞

    本书为公版书,为不受著作权法限制的作家、艺术家及其它人士发布的作品,供广大读者阅读交流。
热门推荐
  • 十方无极

    十方无极

    一场莫名其妙的分离,让丰衣足食的潇云踏上了一条浴血之路。从不韵世事到心有羁绊,又经历了怎样的心伤?当潇云实力强大的时候,却发现一切并没有因为自己的实力变强而结束!潇云渐渐才明白,这世间最可怕的并不是只有无情的苍天和大地,还有那温柔的嘴、险恶的心。当这天地容不下我,人心隔着肚皮我琢磨不透的时候!那我也只好捏碎这心、踏破这大地、碎了这苍天。苍天求饶般的问我:“我何曾伤害过人?我对每个人都是公平的。”潇云只是冷笑一声道:“可你这苍天又曾饶过谁?”
  • 顺向逆行

    顺向逆行

    24小时的预言者这不是穿越这是我和时间签订的契约
  • 讨鬼祭

    讨鬼祭

    若你所知皆是虚假,你可愿相信真实。若你存在即是虚无,你可愿拥抱真相。你是故事的主角,你是众人的中心,你可曾想过,生活也许只是一场远古的仪式,你被众人围绕,并不是因为你是英雄,而是因为你只是棋盘上那最关键的棋子,祭祀中那最重要的——祭品。一个平凡的青年,偶遇一个神秘的组织,卷入一场绵延几千年的斗争。而在故事的最后,真正的主角,真正的始作俑者,真正的你我都逃不开的,正是命运,只是命运。
  • 凤逆天下:冥王毒宠邪魅妃

    凤逆天下:冥王毒宠邪魅妃

    身份的疑云浮出水面,暗杀排挤不断,还能忍?那就大错特错了,所以要放开胆子狠、准、稳、秒虐,来一个杀一个,来一双杀一双,可是这个不要脸的男人是谁?当接近真相后,真相又被毁掉,身边的人一个接着一个离去,被认为是坏人的人却成为了好人,被认为是好人的人却成了坏人,她该如何抉择····PS:新书已发布,轻点右边作者有话说推荐第一本
  • 星辰往事

    星辰往事

    想活下去啊……想和你在一起,一起白头偕老……真的真的好喜欢你。但如果知道结局是这样,我就不会和你告白了啊……笨蛋,干嘛喜欢我啊,像我这种人……笨蛋,不要想我啊,我们要说再见了。比我更适合你的人一定有。你要记得我啊……记得你年轻时候有个女孩喜欢过你,她是你的小公主。但是你要好好活下去,好好生活,好好谈恋爱带着我的那份活下去…你要活到99岁,答应我,宝贝。ILOVEYOU……相信我,这大概是甜文吧……有一点小虐,大概!
  • 无限江山,一晌贪欢:词帝李煜的悲情人生

    无限江山,一晌贪欢:词帝李煜的悲情人生

    本书为散文体传记,以丰富的历史知识为背景,以李煜的词为脉络,运用散文化笔法点评、赏析,进行个性化、情感化解读, 展开李煜悲情的传奇人生。
  • 命中劫之凤凰盛嫁

    命中劫之凤凰盛嫁

    你说命里的劫数会有几何?而曾自己会有想过自己会是他人的劫数?南燕大国,美男无数,风流倜傥,佳人无数,窈窕淑女。骄阳郡主生性活泼有些小狡猾据说和某人是绝配?甜蜜虐单身。某女:爷饿了,咋们吃什么?某男:恩,吃你。某女:这客栈就剩一件屋子一张床,你睡哪儿?某男:恩,睡你。并非有人牵缘,却是冥冥之中的注定。
  • 火影之不会凋谢的冰兰花

    火影之不会凋谢的冰兰花

    “为什么?我碰到的人都变成了冰块?为什么……会死?!”年幼的她一脸茫然失措,看着被自己杀死的玩伴的尸体,止不住的抽泣。村里的人把她当成妖怪驱逐,不知不觉她逃到了汤隐村却意外受伤,路过的白发少年帮助了她。“呐,你的手好凉啊!”“你、你没事吗?”小小的她一脸无辜,生怕这是梦境。“我能有什么事啊?!”“那个……哥哥叫什么?”她想记住这个不会被她变成冰的人。“飞段,你呢?”多年后相遇,他们却是敌人,曾经的约定已经消失不见。“滚开,不然杀了你。”
  • 长生殿生辰夜

    长生殿生辰夜

    她一顿,从怀里掏出那块玉石道:“是因为这块玉石。”宸王挑了挑眉:“是么。”“不信拉倒。”龙昀无心收回玉石,看向宸王的目光多了一丝戏谑:“那么,宸王殿下,你是不是也应该自报家门了呢?”宸王眼中掠过一丝笑意:“那是自然。本王名为呼延梵绝。以后,是你的主子。”龙昀无心:“......”好想把他那张笑的太妖孽的脸挫骨扬灰。
  • EXO之伯贤如果能重来

    EXO之伯贤如果能重来

    冰山的她,遇见了可爱的他,他用心融化了她的冰山,可出现了一个女的,让可爱的他毁掉了被融化的她。多年后,她重回冰山,变得冰冷,她和他之间还会发生什么呢。(本文把泰妍比作坏女人,表示本人并不是有意针对泰妍,我既不讨厌泰妍,也不喜欢泰妍。)